Jeremy Bamber Forum
JEREMY BAMBER CASE => Jeremy Bamber Case Discussion => Topic started by: Adam on March 23, 2014, 09:15:AM
-
The police were in no doubt that Jeremy was guilty.
This belief became stronger when Jeremy was interviewed. Jeremy was extremley evasive, arrogant & negative.
'No comment', 'can't say', 'don't remember' & 'don't know' was said over 50 times. The 'yes' & 'no' answers were said in a singing tone while chewing a loose strand from his jumper. There were also a lot of errors made by Jeremy.
The police at various times thought they were going to get a confession. However none came.
In 1985 police interviews were written down, rather than taped. This meant Jeremy was given the time to anticipate the question and think of an answer. Which makes it even more surprising his answers were so poor.
Jeremys supporters unbelievably say Jeremy was so un coperative because he was innocent & fed up with being interviewed. But surely if innocent he would have been pro active in establishing this & assisting the police in their enquiries. After all, Jeremy had been very co operative with the police before he became a suspect. Why the sudden change in attitude ?
Jeremy admitted the caravan break in after the police asked him about it. Julie had already told the police, so Jeremy had no choice.
The police said if the interviews had been taped they would have got a confession. This I do not believe. Anyone determined & greedy enough to commit such a crime would have been determined to inherit & spend the money. Rather than weakly give it all up after some police questions. Jeremy had told Julie he was watertight, he believed his months of planning would pay off & was prepared to go all the way to live his chosen life. The police were going to have to get a guilty verdict at court.
Do other people believe Jeremy would have confessed if the interview was taped ?
-
NO !
-
I agree.
-
Nothing to confess to !
-
I disagree.
-
TUFF !
-
Tuff back to you.
Why do you think Jeremy was so evaisive, incorrect & un coperative ? If he was innocent he would have been pro active & helpful. Rather than defensive.
He was very friendly with the police during the first month after the massacre. Then suddenly changed. He showed no surprise when the police suggested Sheila could not have shot herself twice.
-
Because so much evidence was kept back from the defence during trial,,it leaves the case wide open for a MOJ on that alone,,without all the other anomalies thrown in. Unless the law still stands on this ruling,,then the case should have been re-opened years ago.
-
This does NOT need to be a whole thread. Quite what the difference would be (taped or not) is beyond me!! I am changing the title and you can use this thread to ask all of your questions which simply require a yes/no answer and I would ask that you stop making unnecessary threads!!
-
Thank goodness for that. This is all about Jeremy--------------not Adam !!
-
This does NOT need to be a whole thread. Quite what the difference would be (taped or not) is beyond me!! I am changing the title and you can use this thread to ask all of your questions which simply require a yes/no answer and I would ask that you stop making unnecessary threads!!
Was just about to delete his name from it. Quite what he thinks he's done is beyond me, to warrant having his name attached to threads.
-
It is a very important question.
The police believed they would get a confession. They did not. But said if the interview had been taped they would have. Which would have changed everthing.
-
It is a very important question.
The police believed they would get a confession. They did not. But said if the interview had been taped they would have. Which would have changed everthing.
Psychic were they? It's not an important question because it didn't happen so we will never know.
-
It would have been highly surprising had they said that they wouldn't have got a confession out of him if they'd sat there till Doomsday.
-
It would have been highly surprising had they said that they wouldn't have got a confession out of him if they'd sat there till Doomsday.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
I do not beleive Jeremy would have confessed if the police had a tape recorder.
He was much too determined to live off the inheritance. He also felt his plan was good enough to get away with it. The police were going to have to get a conviction in court.
Interesting that the police felt otherwise.
-
This does NOT need to be a whole thread. Quite what the difference would be (taped or not) is beyond me!! I am changing the title and you can use this thread to ask all of your questions which simply require a yes/no answer and I would ask that you stop making unnecessary threads!!
My threads have dozens or hundreds or pages of discussion. When I think of a good discussion I will create a thread.
-
My threads have dozens or hundreds or pages of discussion. When I think of a good discussion I will create a thread.
And if it is a thread simply for the sake of adding another one with your name on it, it will be removed.
-
And if it is a thread simply for the sake of adding another one with your name on it, it will be removed.
Good Lord, did he really just say that?! ::)
-
Good Lord, did he really just say that?! ::)
Yup - he obviously thinks this is 'The Adam Show'!!
-
Yup - he obviously thinks this is 'The Adam Show'!!
Not for me! ;D Can´t see him, can´t hear him, LALALALALALAAAA LOL
-
My threads have dozens or hundreds or pages of discussion. When I think of a good discussion I will create a thread.
Only in your opinion Adam. From our perspective you create repetitions mostly about what interesting things you've proved. Create away, but those WE deem to be unsatisfactory will be removed.
-
Well he can bog off and read and discuss what's already here on the forum. There's plenty to get your teeth into,,even for the guilters,,without adding more of the same.
-
Not for me! ;D Can´t see him, can´t hear him, LALALALALALAAAA LOL
:P ;D ;D ;D
-
Not for me! ;D Can´t see him, can´t hear him, LALALALALALAAAA LOL
What a joy for you, Alias :D :D :D :D
-
Not for me! ;D Can´t see him, can´t hear him, LALALALALALAAAA LOL
same here 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) iTS GREAT!
-
OK, now I get it! I have always wondered why Adam writes multiple posts, one after the other - short posts. Why not just write it in one post, I´ve thought to myself. And then this super-annoying habit of quoting his own posts - just that: quoting posts that are already there....
BUSTED! He thinks this is a competition and CHEATS to get high "scores".
Good grief, get a life!!!
-
OK, now I get it! I have always wondered why Adam writes multiple posts, one after the other - short posts. Why not just write it in one post, I´ve thought to myself. And then this super-annoying habit of quoting his own posts - just that: quoting posts that are already there....
BUSTED! He thinks this is a competition and CHEATS to get high "scores".
Good grief, get a life!!!
That's why I said he reminded me of Zippy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M62SnbNizIM ;D ;D
-
That's why I said he reminded me of Zippy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M62SnbNizIM ;D ;D
Hahaa, bet he´s not as cute as Zippy!
-
Hahaa, bet he´s not as cute as Zippy!
Not a chance!! ;D
-
I did NOT take your thread down!!
-
I did NOT take your thread down!!
So there! :P ;D
-
Just out of interest Adam, why do Essex Police think they would have got a confession if the interview had been taped?
I agree regarding the responses in the interview by the way, they read as very evasive, but it isn't always easy to get a true understanding of how an interview went from written stuff. I wish there had been a taped interview as it might be more informative.
-
Just out of interest Adam, why do Essex Police think they would have got a confession if the interview had been taped?
I agree regarding the responses in the interview by the way, they read as very evasive, but it isn't always easy to get a true understanding of how an interview went from written stuff. I wish there had been a taped interview as it might be more informative.
Having to write everything down meant there were long gaps between questions.
The police said Jeremy had time to anticipate the question & think of his answer. So he was always one step ahead. That would not have been the case if the interviews were taped.
I do not believe Jeremy would have confessed if the interviews were taped. He was much too confident of being watertight & proud of his perfect plan. He was also determined to spend the money he was about to inherit.
The police were going to have to get a conviction.
-
30 years later-----------------------no confession ? Why's that,do you think ?
-
30 years later-----------------------no confession ? Why's that,do you think ?
I wrote a post on why Jeremy has not confessed. There are 7 or 8 reasons why. I will re post soon.
-
I wrote a post on why Jeremy has not confessed. There are 7 or 8 reasons why. I will re post soon.
Hi Adam, I know you believe you are the Oracle but doubt anyone else does.
We have heard it all before, thanks.
-
Adam please don't bother to re post anything :'(
-
And I'm certainly not reading any more drivel,and how much you hate Jeremy,Julie being an angel and the most boring,,,,,,,the bloody phone-calls--------------so think again.
-
Adam please don't bother to re post anything :'(
Do you think Jeremy would have confessed if the police interviews were taped ?
-
So now you know.No more regurgitated threads----------------thankyou.
-
Having to write everything down meant there were long gaps between questions.
The police said Jeremy had time to anticipate the question & think of his answer. So he was always one step ahead. That would not have been the case if the interviews were taped.
I do not believe Jeremy would have confessed if the interviews were taped. He was much too confident of being watertight & proud of his perfect plan. He was also determined to spend the money he was about to inherit.
The police were going to have to get a conviction.
By hook or by crook as the saying goes.
-
Adam I don't think Jeremy would have confessed if the interviews were taped infact I don't think Jeremy would have confessed if they had hung him upside down and stuck hot pokers in him. Hope that answers your question Jeremy Bamber will never confess to a crime he did not commit.
-
Do you think Jeremy would have confessed if the police interviews were taped ?
If he was innocent, then no. If he were guilty then no.
-
Adam I don't think Jeremy would have confessed if the interviews were taped infact I don't think Jeremy would have confessed if they had hung him upside down and stuck hot pokers in him. Hope that answers your question Jeremy Bamber will never confess to a crime he did not commit.
Ouch! I rather think he would have if stuck with hot pokers. Anyone would. I would. :(
-
Grahame good point NO all round then ;D
-
Adam had Jeremy Bamber being guilty he would have had all his answers prepared and would not have needed gaps in the questions.
-
If he was innocent, then no. If he were guilty then no.
Cannot see how an interview being taped would have made any difference and that was certainly NOT the reason for recorded interviews to become legal requirements.
On the other hand, one sighting of a red hot poker and I would sing, unless it was the plant, mind you I don't like them much either. :'(
-
Maggie ha ha I did mean the plant hot poker they are quite effective if inserted in the right area ;D ;D ;D
-
Speaking of convictions,,have EP got the murderer who stabbed a poor vulnerable guy 102 times,yet ?
Or are the surrounding public still up in arms about the way the investigation is going ? Know what ? I've heard all this before !!
-
Maggie ha ha I did mean the plant hot poker they are quite effective if inserted in the right area ;D ;D ;D
Am sure they are Susie ;D ;D ;D Doesn't appeal to me anyway!!!! :o :o :o
-
Maggie ha ha I did mean the plant hot poker they are quite effective if inserted in the right area ;D ;D ;D
As a certain Plantagenet King found out. :o
-
As a certain Plantagenet King found out. :o
Oooooooh!! Poor man. :'( :'(
-
Do you think Jeremy would have confessed if the police interviews were taped ?
No.
-
Quite agree - can not see it would have made any difference either way whether he was guilty or innocent - taping or not taping the interview would not have affected his answers.
He may have appeared evasive and a tad annoyed - but I just don't think in his mind he thought the case would EVER get to court because he knew he had not done it and I think he thought the police were being stupid - maybe that was arrogant and his downfall , but you can tell by his answers that he thought they were making it up as they went along. I also think he believed they could trace the calls somehow that would prove his evidence.