Author Topic: Re: The murder of Jodi Jones (Read 197041 times)

So Luke trained his dog to be a cadaver dog ?
He very likely trained the dog as others do to sit, and bark to go out. No big deal. The reason it'll have stood on its back legs against the wall would have been because he'd smelled the presence of the girl if both were familiar with each other being that their senses are stronger than ours, he'd have got the scent of her clothing.

I would agree with that. I read on here a good while ago tht luke asked the family to bring something of jodis with them. They did not so he instructed the dog to seek jodi. Cant remember who said it, i presume sandra. Cant remember though, it may have just been a part of a general conversation though, a what if.

Caroline · « **Reply #1610 on:** October 03, 2019, 07:38:PM »

Quote from: nugnug on October 03, 2019, 07:29:PM

no bt it means the police know theres nothing unusaul about a dog finding a body if there was would be treated with more suspicion.

I don't think they were suspicious about the dog Nugs.

Caroline · « **Reply #1611 on:** October 03, 2019, 07:41:PM »

Quote from: lookout on October 03, 2019, 04:22:PM

So Luke trained his dog to be a cadaver dog ?
He very likely trained the dog as others do to sit, and bark to go out. No big deal. The reason it'll have stood on its back legs against the wall would have been because he'd smelled the presence of the girl if both were familiar with each other being that their senses are stronger than ours, he'd have got the scent of her clothing.

So how does the man in the street train their dog to be a 'cadaver dog'? I can train my dog to sit, spin lay down and even jump, however, to train him to be a cadaver dog, I would need a body - which is a bit of a stumbling block!

marty · « **Reply #1612 on:** October 03, 2019, 07:52:PM »

Quote from: Davie on October 03, 2019, 06:53:PM

Was you a normal lad?

Did you have a dope habit?

Did you deal dope?

Did your mother know & allow you to own & carry blades?

Did you take the blades to school?

Did you write disturbing satanic essays?

Did you tell your friends, that you'd think it would be funny to kill someone?

Did you piss in bottles & store them in your bedroom?

Just for the record, i also had knifes in my teens.

Would say so
No, most of my friends did though
Yeah, speed, e, ching also
Yeah, when going fishing, camping with a friend straight after
No, was gangster rap with me
Probalbly, after listening to above
No, never been subjected to severe trauma as finding a mutelated body at 14

David1819 · « **Reply #1613 on:** October 03, 2019, 08:42:PM »

Quote from: marty on October 03, 2019, 07:13:PM

Been discussed on here a hundred times if you would care to do a bit of research

Please show me where these statements have been posted on here.

marty · « **Reply #1614 on:** October 03, 2019, 08:51:PM »

Im not doing your dirty work for you. Is anyone on here arguing they dont excist?
Im sure its in the court transcripts also when they are being questioned about the changes in their statements. Again, all on the thread.

marty · « **Reply #1615 on:** October 03, 2019, 08:59:PM »

Also talked about on the james english podcasts.

David1819 · « **Reply #1616 on:** October 03, 2019, 09:05:PM »

Quote from: marty on October 03, 2019, 08:51:PM

Im not doing your dirty work for you. Is anyone on here arguing they dont excist?
Im sure its in the court transcripts also when they are being questioned about the changes in their statements. Again, all on the thread.

In other words, they have not been posted on this forum. Just more rumours in the echo chamber.

Sandra, as far as I am aware has only typed out two segments of evidence verbatim. One was Luke's answers in his police interview and the other was the DNA/Sperm evidence.

From this we established that Luke's admission of what he wore that day, corroborated a key prosecution witness. And that the DNA/Sperm from the "real killer" could only have come from contamination.

Needless to say, the more that Sandra reveals the more apparent his guilt. Hence she seldom posts anything.

marty · « **Reply #1617 on:** October 03, 2019, 09:22:PM »

Mate, it was read out in court that they changed their statments. What you not understanding? Youve been told time and time again why full statements cant be put online. Lithium has tried to apply for material, what happened there?
Truth is you get swatted like a fly by sandra when she addresses anything you direct at her.
At least the other guys from the area have an arguement about things because of what tbey have been told over the years, whether i believe it to be true or not. You argue the same nonsense about statements being posted and nug nug lying about knuckles being bruised. Which as you were told before were supposedly( BEFORE YOU JUMP DOWN MY NECK) in the pathologists report. Get a grip min.

nugnug · « **Reply #1618 on:** October 03, 2019, 09:38:PM »

Quote from: David1819 on October 03, 2019, 09:05:PM

In other words, they have not been posted on this forum. Just more rumours in the echo chamber.

Sandra, as far as I am aware has only typed out two segments of evidence verbatim. One was Luke's answers in his police interview and the other was the DNA/Sperm evidence.

From this we established that Luke's admission of what he wore that day, corroborated a key prosecution witness. And that the DNA/Sperm from the "real killer" could only have come from contamination.

Needless to say, the more that Sandra reveals the more apparent his guilt. Hence she seldom posts anything.

no its becouse unlike you she has a life

David1819 · « **Reply #1619 on:** October 03, 2019, 09:49:PM »

In 2010 on TapaTalk. After being asked numerous times to elaborate on what was being claimed about this alleged tracking dog. Corrine Mitchell eventually wrote this about the dog.

"How would you define "fully trained" ?
She was set a "target" say, Luke, for example. or a toy. She found her target EVERY time. One one occasion Luke set out to "fool" her. It did't work.....she found him anyway!
Dog expert who was called up from London to test her even put "target" ( which was a toy in this instance) up a tree.!!!!!
I said ...she was a dog....not a cat.....dogs don't climb trees! He told me he would expect a reaction of the dog would be to indicate to him that the dog knew the target was indeed in the tree........She did and passed with flying colours.
So. if the dog is set a target, and she finds that target EVERY single time.........how much more do you want?.....how much further can she go than to find her target every time?"

Despite her son racking up the most expensive legal aid bill in Scottish criminal history. She then goes on to say that the person who trained the dog never testified at his trial because it cost too much money.

She then goes onto imply that the police have framed Luke by taking and concealing his green jacked.

"one last point about the "Parka"
The police are well aware we never burned the thing..............THEY HAVE IT!!!!!!!!"

She seems to have forgotten that her own son admitted that she was burning something that night.

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/shirleymckie/luke-mitchell-postings-now-archived-see-new-thread-t398-s440.html

If I believed in Luke's claims of innocence. I would be very very concerned by these comments.