Re: The murder of Jodi Jones

[gordo30]

found it

that wasn't me

Ok sorry I tend to lump these things on you .

[gordo30]

Have you seen this proof or do you just believe it exists because someone said so?

The times were put before the court.

[nugnug]

Have you seen this proof or do you just believe it exists because someone said so?

i looked at the timline on previos forum we worked this out years ago.

the reporting of the case at the time states when the texts were deleted.

[nugnug]

the fact is lue was taken in to the station that night his phone was taken from him as is normally the case when your taken into custudy

anything deleted after that time couldd not have been deleted by him.

[nugnug]

Real solid source there nugget

re you saying he wasnt taken into custoody that night.

the source is simple logic.

[nugnug]

The fact the Corinne call was still there indicates the deleting of everything else took place between the contact with Jodi and the finding of the body/phone being handed to police.

it indicates nothing of the sort it indicates that one call wasnt deleted.

[nugnug]

It indicates that everything was wiped and Corinnes call was the only call that followed the deletion.

Why would he delete everything else individually and leave one call?

that does not prove who deleted the texts.

[gordo30]

The fact the Corinne call was still there indicates the deleting of everything else took place between the contact with Jodi and the finding of the body/phone being handed to police.

There is proof that the phone has been accessed and used once in the possession of the police, no one can say for sure when the logs were deleted.

[nugnug]

Maybe not but applying common sense it's the most reasonable explanation:

1) Luke deleted everything off his phone earlier that night and there was no logs up until his mum phoned after midnight.

2) Luke sat and deleted individual calls and messages all except the one from his mum after finding the body, apparently not preoccupied with everything that was unfolding.

3) The police deleted all calls after taking Luke's phone other than Corinne's (and messages from the murder victim which could be vital evidence) because they were already framing him so early on.

how could luke have deleted he texts after finding the body other people would of seen him.

[gordo30]

Where is this proof?

Sandra addressed this only a few pages ago

[nugnug]

Exactly. I'm saying this is unlikely.

why would he have deleted them thres is noting incrimating in them anyway.

[Caroline]

i looked at the timline on previos forum we worked this out years ago.

the reporting of the case at the time states when the texts were deleted.

Using what?

[Caroline]

why would he have deleted them thres is noting incrimating in them anyway.

There is if he's calling people to find out where she is and texting her at the same time. It means he knew where she was the the waiting around is just a smoke screen.

[gordo30]

Will she back it up with proof.

Sandra has put much out via publications and other media outlets if this was not true where’s the litigation ?

[Caroline]

There is proof that the phone has been accessed and used once in the possession of the police, no one can say for sure when the logs were deleted.

Nugs has just said there was a timeline and from that 'they' were able to work out that the texts were deleted when the phone was in the hands of the police?

I can see why Luke might delete them, but not why the police would and there should be a record of WHEN they were deleted.