Sandra’s demeanour and driving force behind this whole agenda is one of sheer desperation, infatuation and obsession. The tone in which she uses towards the Criminal Justice System as a whole is drizzled in bitterness, which comes from her failings in a subject that she so passionately studied at PhD level for three years. It is probable that her infatuation with the Mitchell case led her to this, but listening to her speak in those podcasts shows a woman lost in an endless dark, black hole. Her disgust towards the Criminal Justice System, by in large, plagues her like a disease. It’s as though she can’t accept that society is not just, never will be just, and never has been just. Human beings are not democratic. They are swines, through and through. They are greedy, vengeful and evil, and the sooner she let’s go of this hunch, she may then be able to dig her way out the dark hole. I don’t agree with the system either, but I don’t let it impinge on my life. I don’t agree with capitalism, but I also don’t let it adversely affect my life. I don’t harbour bitterness towards those involved in such systems because, quite simply, it won’t change. It can’t change. Sandra, in my opinion, albeit has been very helpful in answering my previous posts, is deluded, infatuated and obsessed. To allow such a crime to take over your life for the best part of 16 years is a sign of someone who can’t see the wood for the trees. This woman has to stop. Someone has to stop her. Someone has to say, listen, I commend all your efforts of which there is no greater accolade to criminology, but please withdraw from it and put it to bed. The case will never be solved. Any forensic evidence is lost, and has been lost, forever. Mitchell is detained for life, and it is simply tough titty. A Jury convicted him. Game over.
