Video re photographs non-disclosure

[Jane]

so if theres nothing in those photos that helps the defence why were they not disclosed to the defence.

Well now, Nugs. There's another letter for you to write

[nugnug]

Well now, Nugs. There's another letter for you to write

so you cant acully think of answer for why were not disclosed I see.

[Jon2]

https://youtu.be/CY9ei70E70k

Scandalous .

[Jane]

so you cant acully think of answer for why were not disclosed I see.

I can think of one or two, Nugs, but experience tells me it a waste of time sharing anything with you because you're determined to disagree with everything which doesn't further a conspiracy theory.

[nugnug]

I can think of one or two, Nugs, but experience tells me it a waste of time sharing anything with you because you're determined to disagree with everything which doesn't further a conspiracy theory.

how do you know that you argument might be be so good that I couldn't possibly dispute it but I'm guessing know it isn't.thats why you wont say it.

[nugnug]

Scandalous .

scandalous but hardly surprising.

[Jane]

how do you know that you argument might be be so good that I couldn't possibly dispute it but I'm guessing know it isn't.thats why you wont say it.

Nugs, I believe we've yet to see the day when you don't dispute everything anti Bamber. I believe that conspiracy is your raison d'etre. Of course, it SOUNDS convincing. Given who's behind it, one wouldn't expect it to be otherwise. However, making something sound convincing doesn't make it true. I remain cognisant of the phrase "I've told the truth. Just not ALL the truth".

[nugnug]

Nugs, I believe we've yet to see the day when you don't dispute everything anti Bamber. I believe that conspiracy is your raison d'etre.

well ive yet to see the day when the guilters camee up with a credible argument.

if your argument was any good it couldent be disputed could it.

[Adam]

so if theres nothing in those photos that helps the defence why were they not disclosed to the defence.

The photos proved Bamber was innocent Nugs. That is why they were apparently not disclosed at trial.

Nugs is now frothing at the mouth.

[Jane]

well ive yet to see the day when the guilters camee up with a credible argument.

if your argument was any good it couldent be disputed could it.

You see, you've just outlined your determination to keep the conspiracy going.

[nugnug]

The photos proved Bamber was innocent Nugs. That is why they were apparently not disclosed at trial.

Nugs is now frothing at the mouth.

if they don't at least help the defence why would the prosecution not want to disclose them.

[Adam]

well ive yet to see the day when the guilters camee up with a credible argument.

if your argument was any good it couldent be disputed could it.

The forensic evidence Nugs. All 70 pieces. And all with at least 1 source.

Oh and the circumstantial evidence. So much of it I can't face making a list.

No argument needed.

[Adam]

if they don't at least help the deence why would the prosecution not want to disclose them.

Have you got a source the prosecution withheld photographs ?

A credible source, not a CT properganda video.

[nugnug]

Have you got a source the prosecution withheld photographs ?

A credible source, not a CT properganda video.

yes its at the top the thread.

[Caroline]

Just the usual guff