Author Topic: Video re photographs non-disclosure  (Read 94559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #45 on: August 02, 2018, 06:57:PM »
  About 9 minutes in. Prior to this at about 8 minutes is the evidence of the strips being complete in 2001. The anomalies in Mr. Eastbrook's statement are left unaddressed.

OK, will have another look, the guys voice is irritating so had to keep moving it forward.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #46 on: August 02, 2018, 07:23:PM »
OK, will have another look, the guys voice is irritating so had to keep moving it forward.
    I found the narration irritating too. The monotonous delivery surprised me from Peter Tatchell who you would imagine to be more engaging. Steve's comments on this noted but I expected a more engaging delivery.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #47 on: August 02, 2018, 07:31:PM »
    I found the narration irritating too. The monotonous delivery surprised me from Peter Tatchell who you would imagine to be more engaging. Steve's comments on this noted but I expected a more engaging delivery.

I think he delivered it deliberately slowly to make sure the full meaning of what he was saying was grasped.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #48 on: August 02, 2018, 07:32:PM »
    I found the narration irritating too. The monotonous delivery surprised me from Peter Tatchell who you would imagine to be more engaging. Steve's comments on this noted but I expected a more engaging delivery.

OK, I have read the CCRC statement on the video and to be honest, it's not very clear - I can't make out if they are saying that it really wouldn't matter if photo's had been cut from section other than the gun cupboard, which means none were cut OR that some were cut and ............  :-\
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #49 on: August 02, 2018, 07:33:PM »
I think he delivered it deliberately slowly to make sure the full meaning of what he was saying was grasped.

Well that didn't work because I had to fast forward him before I fell into a coma!  ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #50 on: August 02, 2018, 07:44:PM »
Nothing wrong with his speaking voice. Which is why I first said it was clear enough.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2018, 07:45:PM by lookout »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #51 on: August 02, 2018, 07:51:PM »
Nothing wrong with his speaking voice. Which is why I first said it was clear enough.

That's your opinion. Had to fast forward to relieve the boredom.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #52 on: August 02, 2018, 07:52:PM »
Well that didn't work because I had to fast forward him before I fell into a coma!  ;D ;D


Wasn't he supposed to have been 'en ector' at one time? Wonder which drama school he went to?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #53 on: August 02, 2018, 07:55:PM »
I'd rather listen to an educated voice any day !
If it had been some area dialect you'd have still moaned. It's more about the content isn't it ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #54 on: August 02, 2018, 08:22:PM »
I'd rather listen to an educated voice any day !
If it had been some area dialect you'd have still moaned. It's more about the content isn't it ?

Don't mind a dialect, I'm not that judgemental - Gringo didn't like his voice either - nothing to say to Gringo?  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #55 on: August 02, 2018, 08:42:PM »
Don't mind a dialect, I'm not that judgemental - Gringo didn't like his voice either - nothing to say to Gringo?  ::)






What I posted applied to everyone whoever they may be !!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #56 on: August 02, 2018, 08:45:PM »
I don't have a problem telling anyone including those who support JB. Why should I ?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #57 on: August 02, 2018, 08:51:PM »
I don't have a problem telling anyone including those who support JB. Why should I ?

If you say so  ::)
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline IndigoJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #58 on: August 02, 2018, 08:55:PM »
what does it matter what he sounded like? what matters is the information given in the video

imo the prosecution should have disclosed the unused photos , full disclosure is the basis of a fair trial , what happened to the photos of the 5 rooms that they didnt disclose?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Video re photographs non-disclosure
« Reply #59 on: August 02, 2018, 09:02:PM »
The photo's remain under PII.