*Unequivocal Proof Jeremy Bamber is innocent*

[mike tesko]

It's my belief Jeremy staged the body of his dad on his favourite chair. Didn't Scott Lomax mention that the body had been dragged along the kitchen floor, something that would rule out Sheila's involvement?

The only marks anywhere at all on Neville Bambers body, or clothing were gouge marks found on his forearm! A part from this there was no evidence that anyone had lifted or dragged Neville's body! I think it highly likely that Neville himself may have sought refuge on that chair prior to each of the four head shots being inflicted! It is possible that Neville himself arranged the front chair and that he collapsed, or slumped forward over it with the top half of his body! In that slumped position Neville Bamber would have been a sitting duck, an easy target for Sheila to pump four head shots into him with little or no resistance whatsoever!

[mike tesko]

The only marks anywhere at all on Neville Bambers body, or clothing were gouge marks found on his forearm! A part from this there was no evidence that anyone had lifted or dragged Neville's body! I think it highly likely that Neville himself may have sought refuge on that chair prior to each of the four head shots being inflicted! It is possible that Neville himself arranged the front chair and that he collapsed, or slumped forward over it with the top half of his body! In that slumped position Neville Bamber would have been a sitting duck, an easy target for Sheila to pump four head shots into him with little or no resistance whatsoever!

Forget any purported struggle between Neville and Sheila in front of the red painted kitchen aga!

There was no contact between the end of any sound moderator with the aga in any purported struggle involving Neville Bamber and his killer! The scratch marks on the kitchen aga, and matching red paint found almost two months later ingrained into the knurl of the moderator, was as a result of deliberate contamination introduced so that the prosecution could set a trap for Jeremy Bambers defence at the trial!

Cops, relatives and the prosecution's experts were all involved in the entrapment I am talking about!

Sheila's blood and the red paint from the kitchen aga was presented as though both were found either inside or upon the same sound moderator, but I have already proven that Sheila Caffell's blood could not have been found inside the same moderator upon which the red paint that matched the kitchen aga was purportedly found! The sound moderator was not present at Huntingdon Lab' on the 12th September 1985, when Sheila's blood was supposedly discovered inside 'it'...

If the sound moderator was not present at the Lab' on that red letter day, how can Sheila Caffell's blood have been found inside it?

Ann Eaton did not hand over the sound moderator to DC Oakey until the 11th September 1985, Essex police retained possession of the moderator, hanging onto 'it' until the 20th September 1985! On 'that' date, Essex police submitted the sound moderator to the Lab' along with other items that David Boutflour and Ann Eaton had handed over to the police! It was requested that amongst other things that the sound moderator should be checked for blood and fibers!

This request is remarkable, particularly so in view of the fact that blood had already supposedly been found inside the same sound moderator 9 days previously, when to all intents and purposes the moderator was never at the Lab' at all!

I have uncovered clear evidence that the prosecution's use of the sound moderator, Sheila's blood and the red paint from the scratched kitchen aga is 'fabricated evidence', which was deliberately introduced for the specific purpose of entrapment!

[mike tesko]

Essex police and the relatives, and the prosecution's experts, have all adamantly proclaimed that there was only ever one Sound Moderator! The relatives only found one sound moderator! The relatives only ever handed over one sound moderator to Essex police! Experts at Huntingdon only ever examined one sound moderator! Sheila Caffell's unique blood and red paint from the kitchen aga was only found inside and upon one sound moderator - the problem is, the sound moderator was not present at the Lab' when Sheila's blood was supposedly found inside it, and the red paint from the kitchen aga was not found ingrained into the knurled end cap of the sound moderator until after Essex police submitted it on the 20th September 1985, it wasn't until the 2nd October 1985, that Experts matched paint on the sound moderator to the red paint on the kitchen aga!

Glynis Howard, would tell the COLP investigators, that she only ever examined one sound moderator, she only handled a sound moderator, on one occasion! This is a startling admission, and one which should not go unnoticed! Since, COLP wanted to know why she signed an exhibit label bearing the identifying mark, 'DRB/1', which she could not answer satisfactorily! Handwritten Lab' notes confirm that at the beginning of April 1986, Glynis Howard examined the sound moderator! It should be noted, that by April 1986, the sound moderator was being referred to by that ('DRB/1') exhibit reference!

According to the official version of events, Essex police had submitted the sound moderator to the Lab' at Huntingdon on the 30th August 1985!

But..

If that be true, how could Ann Eaton and the relatives still have got possession of 'it', to enable David Boutflour to fill out a police document dated the 11th September 1985, which stated that he had found the gun silencer, the very same date, that his sister (Ann Eaton) handed 'it' to the police! It should also be noted, somewhat joyfully, that DS Eastwood and DS Davidson fingerprinted 'it' on the 14th September 1985, 7 days prior to Essex police submitting the sound moderator to the Lab' on 20th September 1985!

This emphatically establishes that Jeremy Bamber has been wrongly accused and convicted of these murders!

The prosecution's case has collapsed, upon itself, they have been exposed as the real criminals in this matter!

Ann Eaton and David Boutflour have got some very serious questions to answer, as do Essex police, and its experts!

[mike tesko]

What a complete waste of time and money, for the CCRC, who have spent almost two decades rejecting grounds of appeal, and yet they didn't t even have the intelligence to discover that the sound moderator was not present at the Lab' when Sheila Caffell's blood was supposedly found inside 'it'!

Praise be to God!

[mike tesko]

What we are dealing with here, are dishonest prosecution witnesses, and malfeance in public office, by the prosecution, the judiciary, the appellate court, and the CCRC!!

[mike tesko]

What we are dealing with here, are dishonest prosecution witnesses, and malfeance in public office, by the prosecution, the judiciary, the appellate court, and the CCRC!!

I now know with 100% certainty, how the relatives, Essex police, and those at the Lab' managed to cover up the introduction of the sound moderator, so they could 'pretend' that 'it' had been at the Lab' beforehand (allegedly, since 30th August 1985) - they got away with it because the sound moderator was concealed inside the cardboard box that got sent to the Lab' on the 20th September 1985!

[mike tesko]

I have discovered the documentary evidence which confirms that Essex police, the relatives, and the prosecution's experts, have all 'gilded the lily', to frame Jeremy Bamber for alleged involvement in the deaths of five members of his immediate family!

The relatives are wicked individuals, the 'Nazis' of the modern age, Essex police the 'Gestapo', the trial judge 'Drake' Hitler reincarnate!

There was no sound moderator at Huntingdon Lab' on 12th September 1985, to enable experts to find Sheila Caffell's blood inside it on 'that' date!

[mike tesko]

What is somewhat bizzare, is that Ds Eastwood and DS Davidson fingerprinted the sound moderator on the 14th September 1985, despite Ron Cook claiming he had already fingerprinted 'it' twice beforehand, Once on 15th August 1985 by oblique light test technique, and secondly on 23rd August1985 when he exposed the sound moderator to cyanoacrylate fumes (Superglue treatment)! How could Ron Cook have fingerprinted the sound moderator on two occasions before Ann Eaton handed 'it' over to Essex police (11th September 1985)? It just doesn't make sense, or add up..

[mike tesko]

What is somewhat bizzare, is that Ds Eastwood and DS Davidson fingerprinted the sound moderator on the 14th September 1985, despite Ron Cook claiming he had already fingerprinted 'it' twice beforehand, Once on 15th August 1985 by oblique light test technique, and secondly on 23rd August1985 when he exposed the sound moderator to cyanoacrylate fumes (Superglue treatment)! How could Ron Cook have fingerprinted the sound moderator on two occasions before Ann Eaton handed 'it' over to Essex police (11th September 1985)? It just doesn't make sense, or add up..

If Ron Cook fingerprinted the sound moderator by Superglue technique on 23rd August 1985, it must surely mean that Essex police had possession of the sound moderator prior to the 11th September 1985 when Ann Eaton handed 'it' to DC Oakey? But if she did, and if Cook had fingerprinted it by super glue technique on 23rd August 1985, it can only lead to one astonishing conclusion...

[mike tesko]

If Ron Cook fingerprinted the sound moderator by Superglue technique on 23rd August 1985, it must surely mean that Essex police had possession of the sound moderator prior to the 11th September 1985 when Ann Eaton handed 'it' to DC Oakey? But if she did, and if Cook had fingerprinted it by super glue technique on 23rd August 1985, it can only lead to one astonishing conclusion...

Essex police 'must have returned the sound moderator to the relatives'..

Why would police do that?

[mike tesko]

Essex police 'must have returned the sound moderator to the relatives'..

Why would police do that?

Well, if Essex police did hand the sound moderator back to the relatives after Cook had fingerprinted 'it' using super glue treatment on 23rd August 1985,, they have gone out of their way to deny having done so!

Anthony Pargeter, However, made  a comment in one of his witness statements, saying that David Boutflour had told him that police had returned the sound moderator to the family! David Boutflour, on the other hand denied ever having told Anthony Pargeter any such thing! But, it now looks like, cops did hand the sound moderator back to the family! They must have done, because on the 11th September 1985, Ann Eaton is handing 'it' back to the police, and on that very same date, her brother David Boutflour is filling out a police form in relation to finding the silencer his sister handed over!

[mike tesko]

I think that it's a nailed on certainty, that the relatives had possession of the sound moderator, between 23rd August 1985 (when Cook fingerprinted it by super glue technique) and until 11th September 1985, when Ann Eaton handed 'it' back to DC Oakey (this would have placed the sound moderator back in the possession of the relatives for a continuous period of about 19 days)!

During this 19 day period, Essex police arrested Jeremy Bamber on suspicion of the murders for the first occasion!

[mike tesko]

I think that it's a nailed on certainty, that the relatives had possession of the sound moderator, between 23rd August 1985 (when Cook fingerprinted it by super glue technique) and until 11th September 1985, when Ann Eaton handed 'it' back to DC Oakey (this would have placed the sound moderator back in the possession of the relatives for a continuous period of about 19 days)!

During this 19 day period, Essex police arrested Jeremy Bamber on suspicion of the murders for the first occasion!

By the time relatives had possession of the sound moderator during this period, the relatives had full control of whf, Peter Eaton taking on the tenancy of the farmhouse, by the time Robert Boutflour went to see ACC Peter Simpson, and when Julie Mugford' came forward to plant Jeremy in the frame!

It was during this same 19 day period (albeit on the very last day of this period) that Ann Eaton 'returned' the sound moderator to Essex police, and her brother filled out a police form stating that he had found the sound moderator on that date!

Is it just a coincidence, that scratch marks were only photographed on the kitchen aga surround, 'after relatives handed the sound moderator back to Essex police'?

[Roch]

By the time relatives had possession of the sound moderator during this period, the relatives had full control of whf, Peter Eaton taking on the tenancy of the farmhouse, by the time Robert Boutflour went to see ACC Peter Simpson, and when Julie Mugford' came forward to plant Jeremy in the frame!

It was during this same 19 day period (albeit on the very last day of this period) that Ann Eaton 'returned' the sound moderator to Essex police, and her brother filled out a police form stating that he had found the sound moderator on that date!

Is it just a coincidence, that scratch marks were only photographed on the kitchen aga surround, 'after relatives handed the sound moderator back to Essex police'?

I don't understand why nobody can seemingly do a documentary about the silencer alone.  Its' importance in the case and its' anomalies surely warrent a 30 minute slot.  I know Simon McKay in effect achieved this but that was based almost solely on the forensic tests regarding photographs of the wounds - not the issues surrounding the discovery and custody of the exhibit etc. 

How did McKay get the ITV documentary comissioned?

[mike tesko]

Cops gave the sound moderator back to the relatives so that the relatives could 're-introduce'  it later on, and Sheila's blood and the red paint from the kitchen linked to 'it'...