The 'drastic improvements' in Julie Mugfords financial status as per her bank account funds was available at the time of Jeremy Bambers October 1986 Chelmsford Crown Court trial - the jury ought really to have been aware of this dramatic trend in Mugfords financial favour!
Why was one of the key prosecution witnesses, better off financially as a result of still being a student, by the time she was testifying against Jeremy Bamber, as opposed to her lowly financing survival from before the tragedy and at the time of Jeremy's arrest and his prosecution?
So, with Julie Mugford quids in, at the time she was presented to testify against Jeremy at his October 1986 Chelmsford Crown Court trial, and another £25,000 in waiting to flood her coffers, if she helped to get Jeremy Bamber convicted as the killer, even though her evidence was that Jeremy hadn't actually committed the murders himself, he had supposedly hired a 'hitman' with the Christian name of 'Mathew', to do the dirty deed for a paltry £2000 payment...
What a load of old 'codswallop'...
And then...
There were the relatives queuing up to get their hands on the Bamber parents estate!
Oh, and lets not forget the police officers who would receive 'gifts' from the relatives for making all their dreams come true, with a dinner at police Headquarters to boot, everyone well paid, well rewarded, monies in the bank, complaints dropped, and everyone of these prosecution conspirators all better off, great pillars in society!
Oh Yeah....
