Jeremy's belief, - relatives intent on getting hands on anything of value!!!

[Adam]

It's here Caroline. I'd be interested in the clock face if anyone could blow the picture up? https://www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-bamber-new-evidence-will-set-me-free

Dr MacDonell, who testified in the OJ Simpson murder case and was involved in the investigations into the assassinations of US Senator Robert F Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr, told Channel 4 News: “From the bloodstain patterns the victim’s arms must have been moved.

“Bloodstains on the floor showed that other objects were also moved. I concluded that it had to have been murder because of the two shots under her chin. (But) Some time later I learned that the pathologists concluded that she could have fired both shots so I now believe it could have been suicide as well.”

----------------

If a pathologist hired by Bamber says Sheila's contact shot could have been without the silencer, of course MacDonell will say Sheila could have shot herself. Anyone would.

When hired by Bamber MacDonell said Sheila must have been murdered & asked Bamber who else it could have been. Bamber said he didn't know.

Bamber then started focusing on the silencer evidence.

[Adam]

It's here Caroline. I'd be interested in the clock face if anyone could blow the picture up? https://www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-bamber-new-evidence-will-set-me-free

Talk about a load of technicality attempts. Six years later they have all come to nothing.

[Caroline]

Herbert Leon McDonnell has recanted on his 1992 conclusions and now believes it could be suicide.

Herbert Leon McDonnell came to the conclusion of murder in 1992 based on incomplete information.

You cannot use his 1992 conclusions while simultaneously ignoring his revised 2009 conclusions.

That simply mean he doesn't know either way.

[Caroline]

It's here Caroline. I'd be interested in the clock face if anyone could blow the picture up? https://www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-bamber-new-evidence-will-set-me-free

Thanks Steve - which picture of the clock face do you mean?

[Steve_uk]

Which picture Steve?

It must be my eyesight but there was a reference to the clock face showing 10:20am. Maybe it's a different picture?

[Steve_uk]

If we had a timeline of when the photographs were taken and who saw what when we might fare better.

There is a timeline of sorts here: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/alibis-1?tmpl=%2Fsystem%2Fapp%2Ftemplates%2Fprint%2F&showPrintDialog=1