There's something very disturbing about who removed rifle from Sheila's body!

[mike tesko]

Now, I shall start this thread off by drawing attention to what Ron Cook said during the trial whilst testifying!

He stated that 'he' removed the rifle from Sheila's body and that 'he' placed it at the main bedroom window, after handing the said rifle to PI Montgomery who checked the gun to make sure it was empty of ammunition and safe...

Yet, look here at PS Woodcock's witness statement where Woodcock contradicts Cooks version of events..

'There, I removed a gun from the body of Sheila Caffell'.

[mike tesko]

Either, he did, or Ron Cook did!!

[mike tesko]

Either, he did, or Ron Cook did!!

Well, let's look into the significance of this event so that no-one can be left in any doubt that cops staged Sheila's death scene on the main bedroom floor with the rifle from the box room window initially, then from the main bedroom window as per photograph no.23...

[mike tesko]

Well, let's look into the significance of this event so that no-one can be left in any doubt that cops staged Sheila's death scene on the main bedroom floor with the rifle from the box room window initially, then from the main bedroom window as per photograph no.23...

So let's put things into perspective - photograph 23 was taken before any photograph showing the same rifle in Sheila Caffell' possession! The following photographs were taken showing the rifle on Sheila's body in the following sequentially taken photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 (in each of these pictures the rifle has been photographed in Sheila's possession), so we appear to be at an impasse! How many times was the rifle removed from Sheila's body before PS Woodcock removed 'it' at 11.10am?

You see, if the raid team found Sheila's body on the main bedroom floor with the rifle in her possession as claimed by them, then how did the rifle get photographed at the main bedroom window in photograph no.23, before the same rifle was photographed  9 consecutive times as per photo's 25 - 33?

[mike tesko]

So let's put things into perspective - photograph 23 was taken before any photograph showing the same rifle in Sheila Caffell' possession! The following photographs were taken showing the rifle on Sheila's body in the following sequentially taken photographs, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 (in each of these pictures the rifle has been photographed in Sheila's possession), so we appear to be at an impasse! How many times was the rifle removed from Sheila's body before PS Woodcock removed 'it' at 11.10am?

You see, if the raid team found Sheila's body on the main bedroom floor with the rifle in her possession as claimed by them, then how did the rifle get photographed at the main bedroom window in photograph no.23, before the same rifle was photographed  9 consecutive times as per photo's 25 - 33?

The rifle was photographed resting at the main bedroom window (23) before the second team of SOCO's were handed the scene after 10.00am, and so PC Bird could not have even been present inside the farmhouse let alone inside the main bedroom at the time photograph no.23 was taken! Similarly, Ron Cook could not have removed the rifle from Sheila's body and placed 'it' at the main bedroom window before photograph no.23 was taken, because he too was not handed control of the scene until 10.00am, or shortly afterwards...

[mike tesko]

The rifle was photographed resting at the main bedroom window (23) before the second team of SOCO's were handed the scene after 10.00am, and so PC Bird could not have even been present inside the farmhouse let alone inside the main bedroom at the time photograph no.23 was taken! Similarly, Ron Cook could not have removed the rifle from Sheila's body and placed 'it' at the main bedroom window before photograph no.23 was taken, because he too was not handed control of the scene until 10.00am, or shortly afterwards...

DC Oakey took photograph no.23, and 25...

[mike tesko]

DC Oakley took photograph no.23, and 25...

PC Bird took photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, after 10.00am...

[mike tesko]

The very fact that the rifle was photographed at the main bedroom window in photograph 23, before 'ut' was photographed in Sheila Caffell' a possession thereafter, proves conclusively that the cops staged Sheila's death scene in possession of that gun, and that the cops did this because they wanted to pursue her death as a suicide! It was not Jeremy Bamber who had staged his sister's body at all to fool police into accepting that his sister had taken her own life, the suicide part of Sheila's death was cop motivated, there was no other involvement in the staging of Sheila Caffell' a death!

As I say, Jeremy Bamber could not possibly have been responsible for the shooting of his sister, or for staging his sister's death scene!

The facts proving this have been outlined above..

[mike tesko]

And, there's something else in PS Woodcock's December 1985 witness statement that I think is wrong!

[mike tesko]

And, there's something else in PS Woodcock's December 1985 witness statement that I think is wrong!

It states:- '

'before removing the weapon I was unable to see whether it was still loaded'...

But...

[mike tesko]

If the rifle had been laid on Sheila's body the exact same way PC Bird photographed it as per photographs, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33, then why couldn't Woodcock see if there was a bullet loaded in its breech?

[mike tesko]

Let's look at the other side of the rifle!

The rifle must have been laid upon Sheila's body differently before PS Woodcock removed it, than it had been when PC Bird photographed it in Sheila's possession (as shown below)...

[mike tesko]

'the working parts of the weapon were to the rear and I could see through the ejection port the top of the magazine which was empty. The breech was also empty, in a totally safe and empty condition'

The ejection port would have been resting against Sheila's body on the left hand side of her body, not the middle slightly towards the right hand side as shown in PC Birds crime scene photographs!

[mike tesko]

What I don't understand is the following matter concerning the two bullet entry wounds in Sheila Caffell' a neck - her body is presented as being on the bedroom floor in possession of the rifle that supposedly she got shot with! The muzzle end of the guns barrel presented in the region of both wounds, the exposed thread on the end of that guns barrel uncontaminated with any blood or tell tale sign that it could have been used in any contact shots of not only Sheila, but also involving the other victims! There were 20 firearm trained officers at the scene, several senior police officers, and support personnel, yet nobody thought to look for whatever might have been attached to the end of the barrel!

Then we have Cook, Montgomery and Woodcock searching the gun cupboard but not finding or seeing any SM or metal ring which can be screwed onto the threaded barrel!!

[mike tesko]

There's something glaringly inconsistent here, involving who took the gun from Sheila's body?

Was it PI Montgomery?

Was it Ron Cook?

Or, was it PS Woodcock?