Jeremy's belief, - relatives intent on getting hands on anything of value!!!

[mike tesko]

You overlook one vital piece of evidence, 'THE CONTENTS OF OFFICERS REPORT' (reference 1612, refers)...

if what you say was true, why does such an 'Officers Report' exist, and why are it's contents withheld under pii?

If Sheila was already dead by the time the first armed officers entered the kitchen at 7.35am, why was there a shooting incident in that kitchen, who got shot, and who do you think discharged a loaded gun?

[mike tesko]

If Sheila was already dead by the time the first armed officers entered the kitchen at 7.35am, why was there a shooting incident in that kitchen, who got shot, and who do you think discharged a loaded gun?

Well, you are now going to have to pay attention because what I have got to say next proves beyond any doubt whatsoever that PS Woodcock ( Yes, I can name him because it's the truth, I know it to be the truth, and I believe it to be the truth ) PS Woodcock gun discharged a shot when he entered the kitchen, his gun and one round of ammunition was discharged when he entered that kitchen at about 7.35am!  So, prey tell me, and educate me regarding what type of Shooting incident he was involved in? Who did he shoot at? Why did he shoot at that person?  Why has PS Woodcock's witness statement been tampered with from the very point where he makes mention of himself entering the kitchen?

Do you think you and they are dealing with a numpty brain dead person when they are confronted by me, with all these facts?

Pages are missing from Woodcock's witness statement, and a page has been inserted with use of a completely different typeset at the stage where he allegedly enters the kitchen, where the shooting incident occurred according to the 'Officers Report' (1612)...

Hope your not insinuating that I am making these facts up?

Why would the 'Officers Report' (1612) be withheld under pii, concerning a shooting incident in the kitchen upon entry? Moreover, why would page contents be missing from PS Woodcock's witness statement? Why would a completely different type writer be used to insert evidence into the body of an already existing and complete witness statement, at the very point where Woodcock himself enters the kitchen?

Do you believe that I haven't got a brain that is capable of understanding precisely what has been going on here?

The Criminal Justice System should hold its pig breath head in shame for what the system has been allowed to do to this innocent chap Jeremy Bamber..

[mike tesko]

Oh, I get it...

Woodcock's weapon went off accidentally!!!

[mike tesko]

Oh, I get it...

Woodcock's weapon went off accidentally!!!

Such was the accidental nature of the Woodcock firearm discharging a shot when he entered the kitchen, that it was felt necessary to tampered with the contents of his witness statement, take some contents out, and insert different contents using a completely different type writer (see inserted page 5 contents, and query a further 3 pages of missing contents)!!!

So, where are the missing pages of evidence that some corrupted bugger took out if the statement?

[mike tesko]

Such was the accidental nature of the Woodcock firearm discharging a shot when he entered the kitchen, that it was felt necessary to tampered with the contents of his witness statement, take some contents out, and insert different contents using a completely different type writer!!!

So, where are the missing pages of evidence that some corrupted bugger took out if the statement?

We are now getting down to the nitty-gritty part of the case, where the guilty fear to tread!

Well, I'm here trying to get them to answer for that which they have done!

I want answers .

[mike tesko]

Where are the missing original page full of contents from PS Woodcock's witness statement?

Who authorised the removal of this evidence?

When was it authorised?

Which corrupted bugger retyped the inserted page contents?

[mike tesko]

Where are the missing original page full of contents from PS Woodcock's witness statement?

Who authorised the removal of this evidence?

When was it authorised?

Which corrupted bugger retyped the inserted page contents?

Here is the inserted page 5 contents, retyped by a different typewriter:-

The contents have been inserted at this point for a number of important reasons, (1) to conceal the truth concerning the shooting incident which occurred when Woodcock entered the kitchen (1612, refers), and (2) to alter the alleged description of two bodies being present at this stage in the kitchen, here Woodcock adopts a description befitting how PC Bird photographed the kitchen scene from 10.00am, onward, not what Woodcock was actually confronted with, and (3) he describes the kitchen table as having been 'Overturned', so, who put the table back on its four legs and reset the crockery and the utensils?

The devil is always in the detail - please note that on page (1) of Woodcock's witness statement, it states that his statement consisted of 13 pages (each missing page content is true to the best of his knowledge and belief, so please where are the absent three pages of content (4 pages in total including the original page 5 contents)?

[mike tesko]

The kitchen table 'OVERTURNED' by Jove...

[Jane]

You overlook one vital piece of evidence, 'THE CONTENTS OF OFFICERS REPORT' (reference 1612, refers)...

if what you say was true, why does such an 'Officers Report' exist, and why are it's contents withheld under pii?

Do you overlook the vital fact that if YOU have hold/knowledge of " 'THE CONTENTS OF OFFICERS REPORT' (reference 1612, refers)..." it would appear that it's contents are either not/no longer/never have been withheld under pii, OR are available to anyone who asks to see them.

[mike tesko]

Do you overlook the vital fact that if YOU have hold/knowledge of " 'THE CONTENTS OF OFFICERS REPORT' (reference 1612, refers)..." it would appear that it's contents are either not/no longer/never have been withheld under pii, OR are available to anyone who asks to see them.

I have seen the contents of the officers report made by PS Woodcock, it's been withheld from Jeremy and his campaign team as far as I know - if not, ask for it and say why it's needed, nothing could be any simpler, pii will not protect its contents because it contains direct evidence that Sheila was still alive and had not in fact been shot at all until the shooting incident!

[mike tesko]

I have seen the contents of the officers report made by PS Woodcock, it's been withheld from Jeremy and his campaign team as far as I know - if not, ask for it and say why it's needed, nothing could be any simpler, pii will not protect its contents because it contains direct evidence that Sheila was still alive and had not in fact been shot at all until the shooting incident!

Why shoot Neville if he was already dead with 7 bullets already pumped into his body by Sheila?

Do you think it was Neville Bamber who Woodcock shot, and not Sheila?

Of course it was Sheila, who he shot who else could it have been?

[mike tesko]

Why shoot Neville if he was already dead with 7 bullets already pumped into his body by Sheila?

Do you think it was Neville Bamber who Woodcock shot, and not Sheila?

Of course it was Sheila, who he shot who else could it have been?

June?

Hardly likely if she never left the confines of the main bedroom upstairs?

[mike tesko]

Well, you don't think that the shooting incident in the kitchen involved Woodcock shooting dead an already dead child victim, either, do you?

[Jane]

Why shoot Neville if he was already dead with 7 bullets already pumped into his body by Sheila?

Do you think it was Neville Bamber who Woodcock shot, and not Sheila?

Of course it was Sheila, who he shot who else could it have been?

MORE likely it was the Phantom of the Opera.

[Jane]

I have seen the contents of the officers report made by PS Woodcock, it's been withheld from Jeremy and his campaign team as far as I know - if not, ask for it and say why it's needed, nothing could be any simpler, pii will not protect its contents because it contains direct evidence that Sheila was still alive and had not in fact been shot at all until the shooting incident!

Well, if it's only being withheld from Jeremy and his team, what's stopped you from sending for it, making copies and sending them to Jeremy's legal team?