The Case Of Mike Tesko

[mike tesko]

After I was released from prison on bail pending appeal on the bungalow matter in July 1990, as a result ofmanchester police uncovering damning evidence that police officers who testified during my trial had committed offences of perjury, forgery and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, my solicitors made arrangements to visit the bungalow with a view to standing beneath the loft entrance, with the loft cover removed and someone stood up in the loft, replicating the circumstances when two police officers (DS Higham and DC Richardson) allegedly identified a man standing inside the loft as me. My solicitors told me that there was a ceiling light close to the loft opening which hampered the view into the loft through the loft opening, making it less likely that police could have made such a positive identification of the man in the loft back in january 1987, or on any other occasion since then. Solicitors told me that with the hallway ceiling light switched on, that the light from it did not illuminate the loft, like Higham and Richardson had both claimed whilst testifying during my trial. So if the jury had been taken zo the scene and stood beneath the loft opening where Higham and Richardson had both been standing, the jury would have instantly known that the cops were lying anout what they claimed the could see, and saw..

[Stephanie]

Remind the readers Mike, why were you hiding in an attic instead of assisting police? 

Your turn!

[John]

After I was released from prison on bail pending appeal on the bungalow matter in July 1990, as a result ofmanchester police uncovering damning evidence that police officers who testified during my trial had committed offences of perjury, forgery and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, my solicitors made arrangements to visit the bungalow with a view to standing beneath the loft entrance, with the loft cover removed and someone stood up in the loft, replicating the circumstances when two police offivers (DS Higham and DC Rivhardson) allegedly identified a man standing inside the loft as me. My solivitors told me that there was a ceiling light close to the loft opening which hampered the view into the loft through the loft opening, making it less likely that police could have made such a positive identification of the man in the loft back in january 1987, or on any other occasion since then. Solicitors told me that with the hallway ceiling light switched on, that the light from it did not illuminate the loft, like Higham and Richardson had both claimed whilst testifying during my trial. So if the jury had been taken zo the scene and stood beneath the loft opening where Higham and Richardson had both been standing, the jury would have instantly known that the cops wrre lying anout what they claimed the could see and saw..

You have already told everyone it was you and that you made your escape through the roof tiles.  Are you now saying that was a load of bollocks?

[ngb1066]

You have already told everyone it was you and that you made your escape through the roof tiles.  Are you now saying that was a load of bollocks?

No Mike has never said that.  That was the prosecution case which Mike has always vigorously denied.

[John]

No Mike has never said that.  That was the prosecution case which Mike has always vigorously denied.

That's not what he told us on here long before you ever joined.  I should have a screenshot somewhere...

[ngb1066]

That's not what he told us on here long before you ever joined.  I should have a screenshot somewhere...

I have been on here longer than you.  You are mistaken on this. 

 

[John]

I have been on here longer than you.  You are mistaken on this.

I believe if you check the history I made my first post 10 days before you did.  Just sayin.

Back to topic, so Mike is denying that it was he in the bungalow now yet he explained in detail previously why his friend shielded him?

[ngb1066]

I believe if you check the history I made my first post 10 days before you did.  Just sayin.

But I had been a lurker here for several months!  I will check our registration details.

[John]

But I had been a lurker here for several months!  I will check our registration details.

Yes, I remember Jackie Preece mentioning you at the time.


Back to topic, I recall Mike explaining how he was hidden by a friend when the police were looking for him so the question arises, why were they looking for him in the first place?

NGB1066, you of all people know that the police don't go looking for someone unless they are known to them or have information about them relating to a crime.  Mike claims he was stitched up by the police so what excuse does he offer for this as the police just don't pick a target at random?

Maybe Mike can answer.

[ngb1066]

A minor detail ngb as we seem to have joined around the same time. 

I recall Mike explaining how he was hidden by a friend when the police were looking for him so the question arises, why were they looking for him in the first place?

You of all people know that the police don't go looking for someone unless they are known to them or have information about them relating to a crime.  Mike claims he was stitched up by the police so what excuse does he offer for this?

I have read the case papers in relation to this in detail.  It was a situation where Mike was regarded as a target by police and following very common practice at the time the evidence was presented to put Mike in the frame.  They acted on information provided by a notorious police informant.  There was considerable skulduggery involving police pocket books.  From the evidence I have read I have little doubt that Mike was fitted up for this.  No doubt Mike will want to say more about it.

 

[John]

I have read the case papers in relation to this in detail.  It was a situation where Mike was regarded as a target by police and following very common practice at the time the evidence was presented to put Mike in the frame.  They acted on information provided by a notorious police informant.  There was considerable skulduggery involving police pocket books.  From the evidence I have read I have little doubt that Mike was fitted up for this.  No doubt Mike will want to say more about it.

 

Was this case tied in with the murder of Sgt Speed by any chance?

You still haven't answered the question, why was Mike a target, had he a previous record?

[ngb1066]

Was this case tied in with the murder of Sgt Speed by any chance?

You still haven't answered the question, why was Mike a target, had he a previous record?

My answer to the first question is that I do not believe so but I understand why you should ask.

My answer to the second question is that I do not know.  Mike had clearly been profiled and it suited the police to put him in the frame for a series of burglaries, based upon the critical evidence of observation of the house from which someone escaped through the roof.

 

[mike tesko]

Was I involved in the murder of Leeds PS Speed, no...

Did police try to frame me as his killer, yes...

But I got a tip off that they had planted the police issue revolver which was used to kill him, in my vehicles drivers side door panel. As a result of the information I received, the gun was recovered and buried by a stone wall in Wharncliffe, nr Penistone. The police had been planning to arrest me as I got into my car, search it and discover the police issue revolver, but the police informant who planted it there on behalf of the police, had second thoughts and alerted me to the planned operation. I THEREFORE GOT MY STEPBROTHER, to remove the revolver and dispose of it. To cut a long story short, during the planned arrest of me, as I was getting into my vehicle, the police pounced on me, smashing the glass in the drivers door, by use of a pick axe handle, and hauling me off to the police station (the drivers door wasn't even kocked, they only had to open the door by use of the drivers door handle), but they had to have such a dramatization at the time of my arrest, smash the drivers door window, haul me out, take the car away and find 'fuck all"  upon searching it...

They had to let me go (pathetic morons)...

During one of my subsequent trials, which was held up, because I reiterated whilst testifying that police had been trying to frame me as the killer of Leeds police Sergeant Speed, by getting an informant to plant a police revolver in my car which had been used in the officers shooting. The trial judge delayed the trial continuing until ofgicers using a metsl detector were taken to Whatncluffe by my stepbroth, and found it eventually...

[Mr. Gee]

Was I involved in the murder of Leeds PS Speed, no...

Did police try to frame me as his killer, yes...

But I got a tip off that they had planted the police issue revolver which was used to kill him, in my vehicles drivers side doorpanel. As a result of the information I received, the gun was recovered and buried by a stone wall in Wharncliffe, nr Penistone. The police had been planning to arrest me as I got into my car, search it and discover the police issue revolver, but the police informant who planted it there on behalf of the police, had second thoughts and alerted me to the planned operatoon. I THEREFORE GOT MY STEPBROTHER. To remove the revolver and dispose of it. To cut a long story short, during the planned arrest of me, as I was getting into my vehicle, the police pounced on me, smashing the glass in the drivers door and hauling meoff to the police station. The subsequent search of the vehicle revealed no firearm in the drivers door panel . And police had to let me go...

During one of my subsequent trials, which was held up, because I reiterated whilst testifying that police had been trying to frame me as the killer of Leeds police Sergeant Speed, by getting an informant to plant a police revolver in my car which had been used in the officers shooting. The trial judge delayed the trial continuing until ofgicers using a metsl detector were taken to Whatncluffe by my stepbroth, and found it eventually...

I hope they paid for the broken window Mike? I sometimes despair of our police force sometimes. Those few bad coppers make it look bad for all of them.

[mike tesko]

I hope they paid for the broken window Mike? I sometimes despair of our police force sometimes. Those few bad coppers make it look bad for all of them.

No, they didn't, and despite me lodging a complaint about what the police had tried to do to me, nothing became of my complaint. However, I had gained the confidence of one of South Yorkshire polices, 'TOP' informants...

Do you know, the 'informant' who agreed to do this against me, even got his 'thousands of pounds reward', for planting that 'gun' in my vehicle, despite alerting me to what had been going on...