Author Topic: The Case Of Mike Tesko  (Read 100031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #405 on: September 17, 2014, 04:10:PM »
I am back on track...

GET READY SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE AND THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE CRIMINALS...

I won't rest until justice has been done in my case...
« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 04:11:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #406 on: September 17, 2014, 04:13:PM »
I am back on track...

GET READY SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE AND THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE CRIMINALS...

I won't rest until justice has been done in my case...

or, any other case that is brought to my attention...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #407 on: September 17, 2014, 04:37:PM »
I know that as much as 98% of the evidence produced by the police / prosecuting authorities to help to convict a person at trial, is what I shall refer to as bullshit, meaningless or irrelevant evidence. I do not need a solicitor, or a barrister, or a judge, or a QC, or the Lord Chief Justice, or the Home Secretary, or the Queen, or the Prime minister, or god, or Allah, or the devil, or a terrorist, or anybody at all, to try and tell me any different, because I know from experience and keeping a watchful eye on such cases which interest me, that the vast majority of the evidence in most cases, amounts to pure and utter bullshit...

What we need to do, fellow victims, is to identify the 2% of the evidence which either confirms your guilt, or shows you to be guilty. This is what I seek to identify in those cases which I become interested in, it is this 2% of the evidence in the circumstances of my own case, which I have now identified...

This 2% of the evidence, is what I know proves guilt or innocence...

The other 98% is bullshit, and irrelevant...
« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 05:38:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #408 on: September 17, 2014, 04:47:PM »
People who work in the criminal justice system loop, help to produce and to promote this 98% of pure bullshit, in an attempt to try and make themselves look good, and build a case against any defendant so that the judge and the prosecution can hit the jury, with arguments concerning the so called "weight of the evidence"...

At the end of the day, only about 2% of the evidence establishes guilt, or innocence, in most cases...
« Last Edit: September 17, 2014, 04:55:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #409 on: September 17, 2014, 05:26:PM »
i cant argue with that.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #410 on: September 17, 2014, 10:45:PM »
I can debate, until the cows come home, that this happened, or that that happened, in pursuit of the truth, but where does the truth lay?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #411 on: September 18, 2014, 11:08:AM »
In any contentious event, there may be several different versions of the truth, as observed by different parties - different accounts which help to present an accurate account of what had taken place...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #412 on: September 18, 2014, 02:25:PM »
No matter what the prosecuting authorities and their judiciary counterparts say about the weight of the evidence in any case, claiming that such bullshit will inevitably bring a jury to reach a true verdict, I do not believe or accept such a biased view. 98% of evidence in every case, is circumstantial, designed to persuade a jury or anybody else that a defendant on trial must surely be guilty, but this exercise or policy is no longer acceptable. 98% of evidence in every case, falls into this category...

Pure, and utter bullshit...

There is usually only about 2% of the evidence in any case, upon which guilt or innocence can be decided...

Allow me to give you some examples, based on cases brought against me in the past...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #413 on: September 18, 2014, 02:58:PM »
OBSERVATION VAN MATTERS, January, 1986:-

This was a No.3 Regional Crime squad operation, supported by police officers from South Yorkshire police. TWO South Yorkshire Police CID officers claimed they were present inside an observation van outside some target premises in the Monkspring area of Barnsley, at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986, when they claim they observed the arrival at the scene of a stolen motor vehicle, containing two suspects, a driver of the vehicle, and a passenger. Both these CID officers (DC Caulfield, and a DS Shepherd) claimed that at this time, they identified the driver of the vehicle as 'yours truly', and that this mans passenger, was identical looking, other than one of the suspects was four inches taller than the other one...

I was arrested from home in High Green, Sheffield and taken to Barnsley police station, interviewed, and charged with a series of offences in connection with, the aforementioned alleged sighting...

I spent over five and a half years on remand before the case came to court at Barnsley...

During this five and a half months, I was whisked away to Huddersfield police station on the 19th March 1986, and without being interviewed about anything at all, I was taken into court after being charged with an offence of conspiracy, to commit over 500 individual burglaries throughout the north of England, with a person, or persons, unknown...

Can you please try and picture this in your minds eye, it beggars belief that I should be whisked away from South Yorkshire, and taken to Huddersfield (West Yorkshire), and without any interview, that I be charged with conspiring with a person, or persons unknown, to commit a series of 500 burglaries throughout the north of England, and that although I was already in custody on remand as a result of the observation van evidence from 22nd January 1986, the prosecuting authorities put me before the court at Huddersfield, and sought to apply to remand me in custody pending trial on these latest allegations...

I later  found out, that the vehicle subject of the South Yorkshire allegations (observation van matter) had been stolen during a burglary in West Yorkshire, and that on the very day that I was brought to Huddersfield to be charged with a blanket conspiracy charge involving 500 burglaries supposedly carried out throughout the north of England, that the No.3 Regional Crime Squad, and the serious crime squad had instigated (19th March, 1986) an operational investigated named, 'OPERATION SWAG', which included widescale raids at many suspects homes in different parts of the country, including my home where I had previously been living in at High Green, Sheffield, prior to my arrest from there, on the 30th August 1986...

Lo and behold, unbeknown to me, on that day, my previous home address (aforementioned) was raided by a task force, and a gold gentlemans wrist watch was apparently found on a bedside cabinet in a bedroom where I had normally been sleeping on occasions prior to my arrest a couple of months beforehand - this gold watch had not been there when police came to arrest me on the 30th January 1986, when I was taken into custody for the so called observation van matters...

Anyway...

to cut a long story short, my solicitor managed to get the Magistrates in Huddersfield to grant technical bail, on the basis that I was already on remand in South Yorkshire, and that if I was remanded in custody on these latest allegations, it would create a logistical nightmare for the prison authorities who would have to produce me to Barnsley court for the observation matters, and produce me to Huddersfield courts in relation to the latest West Yorkshire allegations...

I was therefore, granted bail in the West Yorkshire Matters, but I continued to be remanded in custody on the observation van matters...

Prosecution had mentioned that both cases were hopefully going to be joined together at a later date, because the two investigations involved the same police officers, and each investigation overlapped the other, or vice versa...

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #414 on: September 18, 2014, 11:02:PM »
In July 1986, the case against me in the observation van matters were thrown out of court because it was established under cross examination that police officers lied about being inside an observation van parked in the road outside target premises on the 22nd January, at 5.20pm - because a Detective Inspector in the No.3 Regional Crime Squad testified under oath that he was in overall charge of the surveillance on that date, and that he did not send for the observation van which was parked up in the police compound until 6.05pm, that same night. He also confirmed when questioned under oath by my solicitor, that officers DC Caulfield, and DS Shepherd could not have been inside the observation van at 5.20pm, on that date, nor have been able to identify the driver of a stolen motor vehicle as yours truly, because the van was not parked in the road outside the target premises at the time they both claimed they had been inside it...

Case against me collapsed, and I walked free from court because I had been granted technical bail in the other West Yorkshire matter, involving some of the same police officers guilty of trying to pervert the course of justice by the introduction of falsified identification / recognition evidence...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

John

  • Guest
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #415 on: September 23, 2014, 09:24:PM »
Remind the readers Mike, why were you hiding in an attic instead of assisting police?  ;D

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #416 on: September 23, 2014, 11:32:PM »
Remind the readers Mike, why were you hiding in an attic instead of assisting police?  ;D
Maybe you would like to remind all of us why you also were found guilty in a court of law?
Please desist in trying to stir things up with Mike. For I know a great deal about your case and would gladly reveal it to the forum if you continue to harrass Mike.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2014, 12:02:AM by Mr. Gee »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #417 on: September 23, 2014, 11:51:PM »
the phrase glass house and stones spring to mind.

Mr. Gee

  • Guest
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #418 on: September 24, 2014, 12:03:AM »
the phrase glass house and stones spring to mind.
The word "hypocrite" springs to mine.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17251
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: The Case Of Mike Tesko
« Reply #419 on: September 24, 2014, 04:32:PM »
well yes that to.