why does mugford never do this.

[lookout]

Let me get this straight. She MET him........once, twice? How would that cause her to be "acquainted" with him? Can you provide evidence of "nights on the town" together with evidence that they singled each other out for conversation and/or exchanged names/addresses/phone numbers? Julie lived in London. In a house from which outgoing calls couldn't be made. She couldn't contact him. Did she meet with him each and every time she visited Jeremy? Did she meet with those who may have known him very time she visited Jeremy? I'd like to know how you define "acquainted".

Who knows how many times she may have met him ? NONE of us can say,can we as he seemed to have been in the company of the usual clique in pubs and nights out. ?
As it happened,JM was with JB,not MM,but she'd have known about him all the same. As for the term " nodding acquaintance ",well you can always refer to that,being as you're so pedantic.

[Jane]

Who knows how many times she may have met him ? NONE of us can say,can we as he seemed to have been in the company of the usual clique in pubs and nights out. ?
As it happened,JM was with JB,not MM,but she'd have known about him all the same. As for the term " nodding acquaintance ",well you can always refer to that,being as you're so pedantic.

So for your purposes, they were 'close up and personal'? She may well have SEEN him. It doesn't mean she KNEW him. He may well have been -as part of a crowd- at some of the same social functions, but he may NOT have been one of those she socialized with whilst they were there. In fact, it's possible that had she seen him anywhere other than with Jeremy and her usual crowd, she may not have recognized him. Pedantic? I? When you insist "She'd have known him all the same"?

[lookout]

So for your purposes, they were 'close up and personal'? She may well have SEEN him. It doesn't mean she KNEW him. He may well have been -as part of a crowd- at some of the same social functions, but he may NOT have been one of those she socialized with whilst they were there. In fact, it's possible that had she seen him anywhere other than with Jeremy and her usual crowd, she may not have recognized him. Pedantic? I? When you insist "She'd have known him all the same"?

FGS,there you go again  " Up close and personal is miles away from a nodding acquaintance-------do stop exaggerating,it's tedious,tiresome and predictable.

[lookout]

The whole crux of it was that she knew him and knew of him---end of.

[Jane]

The whole crux of it was that she knew him and knew of him---end of.

'Knowing' a person is very different from knowing OF a person and neither signifies a close enough relationship for one to ask the other if they'd committed murder.

[lookout]

'Knowing' a person is very different from knowing OF a person and neither signifies a close enough relationship for one to ask the other if they'd committed murder.

I DID NOT mention any close-relationship--------you did ! 

[Jane]

I DID NOT mention any close-relationship--------you did ! 

However, you're suggesting it was close enough for her to ask him if he'd been responsible for slaughtering the Bamber family. Not a question I'D ask of someone I was only "nodding acquaintance" with.

[lookout]

However, you're suggesting it was close enough for her to ask him if he'd been responsible for slaughtering the Bamber family. Not a question I'D ask of someone I was only "nodding acquaintance" with.

It would be far easier to ask someone like that than someone you knew very well ? I could.

[Adam]

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1057.0;attach=3286

MM says he does not know a Julie Mugford.

The police then remind him he is Bamber's girlfriend & he knows who she is.

So there was no way Julie could have located him. And no reason why she should.

[Jane]

It would be far easier to ask someone like that than someone you knew very well ? I could.

Well, next time you approach someone -whose company you've only been in a couple of times- and ask them, out of the blue, if they've committed murder -or any other heinous crime of your choosing- perhaps, as you habitually make claims of having the ability to carry out tasks/ask questions others would have the good grace to refrain from, you'd like to make some provable record of it for posterity and verification, otherwise it's only a question of bravado on your part, isn't it.

[Adam]

i notice rwb also suspects macdonald to me thats that ethere he thought jeremy dident have the stomache to actully do the deed himself or he thought couldent of actully got there in time.

Hopefully Nugs will provide a source for this today as well. Which has been requested by more than one poster on this thread.

It does waste a lot of time for posters on the forum if Nugs says a relative, the police or Bamber said something, when they didn't.

[Caroline]

Hopefully Nugs will provide a source for this today as well. Which has been requested by more than one poster on this thread.

It does waste a lot of time for posters on the forum if Nugs says a relative, the police or Bamber said something, when they didn't.

He doesn't have one, he got that idea from David.

[David1819]

He doesn't have one, he got that idea from David.

Got what idea from me?

[Caroline]

Got what idea from me?

No idea

[nugnug]

Hopefully Nugs will provide a source for this today as well. Which has been requested by more than one poster on this thread.

It does waste a lot of time for posters on the forum if Nugs says a relative, the police or Bamber said something, when they didn't.

david allready provded a source for that