0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Eh? I'm saying that it's unlikely she had a shower after the killings. Furthermore, she might have had one in the morning, not before she went to bed. You are trolling this forum, and I don't think anything you say can be taken seriously any more.
It would have remained in situ. Women don't have any problems performing sports,so why should hurtling around like a dervish be any different ?Not that this has to do with anything.
Of course it would have remained in place - it was designed to do so. Do you think women in the '80s never moved in case their tampon fell out?
Where's your proof for this?What kind of tampon was it?What time did she change her tampon?They didn't have pearl tampons back in the 80's!!Had the tampon leaked? The pathologist didn't state this in his evidence!
You are trolling this forum, and I don't think anything you say can be taken seriously any more.
You are projecting Kaldin!
Of course it would. The suggestion that it wouldn't have stayed in place is laughable.
I can assure you, from embarrassing memory, that it wouldn't (necessarily) have stayed in place and such an occurrence is anything but laughable.
It was a Tampax.Don't think we know that. I wouldn't want to guess.I never found Tampax as secure as Lillets. They had a tendency to 'slip' if not changed in time.It seems not to have leaked. The pathologist said she was in the early stages of menstruation.
In the toxicology report there was no suggestion that Sheila had taken painkillers, which suggests that she didn't suffer period pains. In the 80s women didn't go to bed just because they had a period.
Exactly Jane! And they didn't make tampax pearl back in the 80's, which are more like Lillets.But the pathologist wasn't specific about this. What does early stages mean? Every women is different. Some women mentruate for 3 or 4 days, some women a week or longer. Was she on the pill?