Author Topic: Why wasn't crispy shot?  (Read 40301 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #285 on: October 20, 2017, 05:42:PM »






I do,probably more so than you obviously do.

From some of your pronouncements, I think it's unlikely.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #286 on: October 20, 2017, 05:43:PM »





I'll lookout for any strange posts coming from you, :)) :)) :)) :))

Lookout keep an eye on my posts I have just taken 30mg of codeine hehehe

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #287 on: October 20, 2017, 05:44:PM »
Lookout thanks for that.








You're welcome Susan.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #288 on: October 20, 2017, 05:45:PM »
Lookout keep an eye on my posts I have just taken 30mg of codeine hehehe






Oh I will Susan,I will  :)) :)) :)) :))

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #289 on: October 20, 2017, 05:47:PM »
Some people think Bamber showered & changed at WHF. Then disposed of clothes prior to meeting the police.

Adam wonder if the EP checked the bathroom towels and where did he dispose of his clothes?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #290 on: October 20, 2017, 05:48:PM »
It would only be worth Bamber showering & changing at WHF if he planned to dispose of clothes on the way back to his cottage. Which was not hard to do as he had 3 miles of farm land & water to use.

He could have disposed different items of clothes in different locations within the 3 miles. Or just spent 5 minutes burning them.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #291 on: October 20, 2017, 05:52:PM »
It looks like Mike was right.

Sheila read the bible on the floor.  Then took her massacre clothes off & hid them where they would never be found.

Sheila put on her nightie but no shoes. Then stayed alive until the raid team entered WHF.

The raid team then shot Sheila twice with the massacre rifle. Pulled her legs & put the bible on her arm.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2017, 05:54:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #292 on: October 20, 2017, 06:00:PM »
Oh dear.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #293 on: October 20, 2017, 06:06:PM »
I was going to say that would explain why there was no evidence on Sheila regarding the massacre.

However a shower would not have removed GSR from the previous 23 shots.

Back to the drawing board.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2017, 06:07:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #294 on: October 20, 2017, 06:37:PM »
Or because it was summer, she slept on top. However, perhaps that's what she did as a matter of habit - I do the same.

Yes, although looking at the bedclothes in the main bedroom, it was probably not a hot night.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #295 on: October 20, 2017, 06:47:PM »
Yes, although looking at the bedclothes in the main bedroom, it was probably not a hot night.

There was a lot of aggravation in that room, the upset isn't all from the bed being slept in. Also, older people feel the cold more but they also had the window open.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #296 on: October 20, 2017, 06:49:PM »
There was a lot of aggravation in that room, the upset isn't all from the bed being slept in. Also, older people feel the cold more but they also had the window open.

They weren't ancient - they were only 61. It just looks to me like they had quite a few bedclothes.

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #297 on: October 20, 2017, 08:14:PM »
And why did her nightie have no gun shot residue on ?

Did the raid team shoot Sheila. Twice from point blank range. With Nevill's rifle rather than their own ?

Don't tell me Mike was right all along.

The nightdress must have had residue on it. There are photos of the gun laying on the nightdress.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #298 on: October 20, 2017, 08:31:PM »
The nightdress must have had residue on it. There are photos of the gun laying on the nightdress.

Good point there.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Why wasn't crispy shot?
« Reply #299 on: October 20, 2017, 08:44:PM »
The nightdress must have had residue on it. There are photos of the gun laying on the nightdress.



51. Mrs Caffell's nightdress was bloodstained. When tested the blood was consistent with being her own blood.

The garment was also examined for the presence of any firearm discharge residues or oil from the rifle. No such traces were found. The scientist gave evidence that there would be a strong chance of finding such residues or markings on the clothing of an individual who had fired a rifle twenty-five times.


Why would gun shot residue be on Sheila's nightdress if all Bamber did was put the rifle on her ? Anyway there was no GSR on her. 

« Last Edit: October 20, 2017, 08:48:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.