Where did the allegations in the Mckensie report originate; Jeremy Bamber?

[Kaldin]

Don't worry about it Stephanie, it's not your concern.

[maggie]

David's tactic is to focus on me when evidence is posted. Which is against forum rules.

He did previously briefly say the COA was not a valid source. If that's the case then thousands of former & future appeals could be wrong.

Anyway, page 2 on this thread has 23 pieces of evidence from the COA & 8 other sourced pieces of evidence. Showing Sheila did not commit the massacre.

Not sure what else supporters can be given apart from a signed confession from Bamber. Even then supporters will claim RB forged Bamber's signature.

Adam, as usual you are pushing your luck.  You are at least as guilty as anyone else of focusing on other posters and making sarcastic comments.  It is a case of the pot calling the kettle....

[Adam]

How to make a list of 31 pieces like Adam.

Step 1: Take 5 pieces of outdated and refuted evidence.

Step 2: Turn those 5 pieces into bullshit by claiming they are undisputed.

Step 3: Turn those 5 pieces of Bullshit into 25 by rewording those 5 pieces of bullshit fives times over.

Step 4: Insert 6 pieces of factual evidence that don't prove anything in order to make the other 25 pieces of bullshit look honest.

Step 5: Make up a source for each piece of bullshit by misquoting or misattributing the infomation to a any particular person.

Step 6: Claim Bamber agrees to everything and anything because Roger Wilkes interviewed him.

Step 7: Never talk about one single piece of evidence at a time because none of them stand up to scrutiny.

Step 8: Once people realise the list of pieces is just a load of garbage simply ignore them and post it all again.

Done.

Davids unprovoked post. Reply 18.

Maggie must have missed it.

[lookout]

Who knows but Jeremy certainly wasn't

Were they or weren't they ?

[lookout]

Adam is NOT manipulating you; Jeremy Bamber is!

As Adam has rightly pointed out, youre too busy focused on him, me or whoever Jeremy points you towards at that given moment in time. And indeed what ever evidence is the trend of the week.

JB doesn't do manipulating-------but there are 4 here that do !! Or try.

Aren't you also busy focussed on his guilt ??

[Caroline]

JB doesn't do manipulating-------but there are 4 here that do !! Or try.

Aren't you also busy focussed on his guilt ??

Oh yes he does Lookout.

[maggie]

Davids unprovoked post. Reply 18.

Maggie must have missed it.

I saw it and I am reminding you that you are at least as bad as him.  If I choose to let David's comments on you and your comments on him go for now it may be a good idea if you don't provoke the situation by drawing attention to David's posts when you have behaved in a similar manner to him and to other posters.

[lookout]

Oh yes he does Lookout.

No.

[Caroline]

No.

Yes

[Adam]

I saw it and I am reminding you that you are at least as bad as him.  If I choose to let David's comments on you and your comments on him go for now it may be a good idea if you don't provoke the situation by drawing attention to David's posts when you have behaved in a similar manner to him and to other posters.

I just posted published evidence - reply 15.

Then David focused on me - reply 18.

This always happens.

Please confirm how to resolve this.

[lookout]

Yes

How and when and to whom ?

[maggie]

I just posted published evidence - reply 15.

Then David focused on me - reply 18.

This always happens.

Please confirm how to resolve this.

I have sent you a pm.

[Caroline]

How and when and to whom ?

He has been described as manipulative by many people - it wouldn't matter if they incidents were listed, yiu would choose not to take it on board and that's your prerogative. Nevertheless, it's how others that have known him - see him.

[lookout]

He has been described as manipulative by many people - it wouldn't matter if they incidents were listed, yiu would choose not to take it on board and that's your prerogative. Nevertheless, it's how others that have known him - see him.

Who would these " others " be. ? The ones who say he's guilty ?

[Caroline]

Who would these " others " be. ? The ones who say he's guilty ?

Not necessarily