The Bible

[Caroline]

Exactly - that's what I want to know because I want to know if there's blood on the note.

They took it out of the bible - it was evidenced because there is reference to it in CAL's book.

[Kaldin]

I know and you can't see the cover on that side.

I can - I can see the edge of it. If you can't see it, you can't.

[Kaldin]

They took it out of the bible - it was evidenced because there is reference to it in CAL's book.

I realise they took it out of the Bible, but was it photographed or used in evidence?

[lookout]

Exactly - that's what I want to know because I want to know if there's blood on the note.

And also whose writing it is on that note interests me even more.

[Stephanie]

And also whose writing it is on that note interests me even more.

If you were told it was Jeremy's you'd argue till you were blue in the face it was Sheila's

[lookout]

If you were told it was Jeremy's you'd argue till you were blue in the face it was Sheila's

Erm------no I wouldn't because I'd say it was June's.

[Kaldin]

Erm------no I wouldn't because I'd say it was June's.

Me too. I think it was probably notes that June had made previously.

[lookout]

Me too. I think it was probably notes that June had made previously.

I would have assumed that because that particular Bible had been hers,she took it to church with her,complete with notes and " bookmark " in readiness for her next lessons/readings.

[Kaldin]

I would have assumed that because that particular Bible had been hers,she took it to church with her,complete with notes and " bookmark " in readiness for her next lessons/readings.

Yes, that's very feasible. My interest in the note is the issue of whether there was blood on it or not.

[lookout]

Yes, that's very feasible. My interest in the note is the issue of whether there was blood on it or not.

Yes,indeed. I have noticed all along that very little reference was ever made regarding the Bible and its contents.

[Kaldin]

Yes,indeed. I have noticed all along that very little reference was ever made regarding the Bible and its contents.

The interest in it has always been rather superficial IMO, even at the appeal of 2002. There's been no detailed examination of the blood staining and the positioning of the Bible.

[Stephanie]

Erm------no I wouldn't because I'd say it was June's.

Me too. I think it was probably notes that June had made previously.

Yes,indeed. I have noticed all along that very little reference was ever made regarding the Bible and its contents.

 

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5372.msg373771.html#msg373771

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7866.msg374016.html#msg374016

Don't you remember this Lookout http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8216.msg389732.html#msg389732

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7292.msg352659.html#msg352659

[Kaldin]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5372.msg373771.html#msg373771

What's your problem? Why should I remember something said when I wasn't even here? I'm discussing this with Lookout, so I don't know why you posted that.

[lookout]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5372.msg373771.html#msg373771

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7866.msg374016.html#msg374016

We're not referring to that .

[lookout]

The notes being referred to begin with " Love on Another " and are to do with the killings of hundreds in South Africa.