The interest in it has always been rather superficial IMO, even at the appeal of 2002. There's been no detailed examination of the blood staining and the positioning of the Bible.
Bamber had every opportunity to ask these question during his MURDER trial.
You should be asking yourself WHY he didn't!
He cultivated and supplied drugs and robbed the family run caravan park to "TEACH THEM A LESSON," hardly someone who wasn't criminally minded.
His police interviews show his criminal mind in action. As did his attitude during trial. Remind me, when he stood in the dock, how many times he said he was innocent?