Is the Earth flat, or round, or both, but not spherical?

[mike tesko]

And? https://www.space.com/7267-moon-daylight.html

Reader maintained in one of his posts to me, that you can't get a full moon in the same region of the sky as the sun!

But I insisted that you could..

[mike tesko]

The true position of Antarctica is not at the south pole, since the ice walls exist around the outside of a round shaped flat earth ( with a build up of thick ice all the way around it's circumference, equivalent to a 2p piece), The only true pole is the north pole around which Antarctica exists around the circumference of a flat earth!

[Caroline]

You need to watch the link to have any chance of understanding which part of Antarctica is where the ice walls are located, situated, to be found...

(1) - https://youtu.be/KcxraxCQCd0

No, it's part of the same video I posted and you need to view the whole thing, not just a section taken out of context. He is talking about other countries utilizing the area and how it could be a strategic advantage to them if they managed to take hold. He;s not talking about an ice wall.

See what he actually said and his OWN explanation of it here;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1A

[Caroline]

Reader maintained in one of his posts to me, that you can't get a full moon in the same region of the sky as the sun!

But I insisted that you could..

I have seen the moon is daylight before but that isn't any proof of a flat earth.

[Caroline]

The true position of Antarctica is not at the south pole, since the ice walls exist around the outside of a round shaped flat earth ( with a build up of thick ice all the way around it's circumference, equivalent to a 2p piece), The only true pole is the north pole around which Antarctica exists around the circumference of a flat earth!

So according to FET (flat earth theory) Antarctica is the whole circumference of earth? What does the circumference measure?

[mike tesko]

Have a look at the following image of this particular crescent shaped moon in the night sky! You can clearly see a star where the dark portion of the moon should be!!

[mike tesko]

I have seen the moon is daylight before but that isn't any proof of a flat earth.

If you saw a full moon in the daytime sky at the same time you saw the sun in the same region of the sky, then from what I can gather, according to Reader that can't and doesn't happen! But I insisted that it could, and it did! I posted the images to give verification of my assertion!

[mike tesko]

No, it's part of the same video I posted and you need to view the whole thing, not just a section taken out of context. He is talking about other countries utilizing the area and how it could be a strategic advantage to them if they managed to take hold. He;s not talking about an ice wall.

See what he actually said and his OWN explanation of it here;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czW0iRJuH1A

I know what he said, and I am not taking anything out of context as you put it, because he talked about different things in that footage! The most intriguing part being where he mentions 'that strangely enough in the world today an area as big as the united States of America, which has never been seen by a human being' (continuing) 'and that's beyond the pole on the other side of the south pole from 'Little / middle' America' (continuing) ' an area as big as the United States thats never been seen by a human being'!Try fast forwarding it to the crucial part (29 seconds in to 43 seconds)I am drawing your attention to..

[Caroline]

I know what he said, and I am not taking anything out of context as you put it, because he talked about different things in that footage! The most intriguing part being where he mentions 'that strangely enough in the world today an area as big as the united States of America, which has never been seen by any human being! Try fast forwarding it to the crucial part I am drawing your attention to..

I have posted the FULL video Mike and I have heard what he said but not sure what you think is significant about ......

"Strangely enough, there is left in the world today, an area as big as the United States, that's never been seen by a human being. And that's beyond the pole, on the other side of the south pole from Little America [his base on Antarctica]".

[mike tesko]

I have posted the FULL video Mike and I have heard what he said but not sure what you think is significant about ......

"Strangely enough, there is left in the world today, an area as big as the United States, that's never been seen by a human being. And that's beyond the pole, on the other side of the south pole from middle America [his base on Antarctica]".

[Caroline]

I just said that - which part are you saying backs up your claims?

[mike tesko]

But he doesn't say 'Little' America he actually says 'Middle' America - and he's talked about an area as big as the United States, that's never been seen by 'A' human being, and 'thats beyond the pole', on the 'other side of the south pole' from 'middle' America...

He wasn't taking about his base at 'Little' America, he was talking about an area as big as the United States 'in America'...

[Reader]

I have seen the moon is daylight before but that isn't any proof of a flat earth.

The moon can be seen in daylight sometimes, but the article that mike tesko linked to clearly states "At full moon, the moon is exactly opposite the sun", which implies that if you see the approximately full moon in daylight, the sun isn't in the same area of the sky, but instead about as far away in the sky as is possible - both will be on or near the horizon, but in approximately opposite directions from the observer's point of view.

It also means that when the moon is very close to being a full moon and is wholly above the horizon, the sun is below the horizon (in the approximately opposite direction) and so not directly visible at the same time as the moon. This situation can occur shortly before sunrise or shortly after sunset.

[Reader]

But he doesn't say 'Little' America he actually says 'Middle' America

You could be right, as it sounds like "Middle" to me. However, it's clear that he meant to refer to his base (i.e., Little America, unless there was another one called Middle America), because it wouldn't have made sense for him to refer to such a vague location as middle America in what he said. He seemed quite tense during the interview, and possibly made a slip of the tongue.

[mike tesko]

You could be right, as it sounds like "Middle" to me. I assert that I am right, he was talking about 'middle' America, not about 'Little' America, and in that same sentence he is talking about 'an area as big as the United States', that's never been seen by 'A' human being, and 'thats beyond the pole', on the 'other side of the south pole' from 'middle' AmericaHowever, it's clear that he meant to refer to his base (i.e., Little America, unless there was another one called Middle America), because it wouldn't have made sense for him to refer to such a vague location as middle America in what he said. I disagree, because of what had happened to the supposed 8 month 'Operation Highjump' which came to an abrupt halt after only 7 weeks or so, with loss of a ship, aeroplanes, other equipment, and personnel, during the escape back to civilisation! It seems somewhat obvious to me that Admiral Bird was referring to an area in the middle of America, which had not been seen by 'A' human being! He was of course referring to 'AREA 51' in 'NEVADA'...He seemed quite tense during the interview, and possibly made a slip of the tongue. No, he didn't, he was articulate and specific in what he said during that interview. It was his way of telling the wider public at large that aliens were encountered during his South Pole Expedition, and that this was in his mind without him actually mentioning his fleet being chased off the so called south pole area by aliens using UFO's with the loss of hardware and men...