Is the Earth flat, or round, or both, but not spherical?

[Caroline]

Any moon in outer space can never have cloud formations behind it!!!

It doesn't.

[mike tesko]

Clouds behind and in front of the moon!

Watch the video and become educated...

(1) - https://youtu.be/SdojiTkJi_4

[mike tesko]

Everything points to the moon being inside the firmament of the earth, exposed by presence of clouds behind and in front of the moon!

[Caroline]

Clouds behind and in front of the moon!

(1) - https://youtu.be/SdojiTkJi_4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnfHdZrmMAw

[mike tesko]

The USA did not go to and land on the moon - it was all a massive deception!

[mike tesko]

...

[mike tesko]

Everything points to the moon being inside the firmament of the earth, exposed by presence of clouds behind and in front of the moon!

The sun must be outside the firmament, and it reacts with the moon and whatever it is that the earth is, to produce the seasons, the high tides and low tides, partial and  full eclipse of the moon and sun, earth shine on the moon, etc...

The flat earth module, rotates on its own axis, making it appear that the sun, moon and planets rotate around the body of the earth, but it is the earth which spins on its own axis...

[mike tesko]

The sun must be outside the firmament, and it reacts with the moon and whatever it is that the earth is, to produce the seasons, the high tides and low tides, partial and  full eclipse of the moon and sun, earth shine on the moon, etc...

The flat earth module, rotates on its own axis, making it appear that the sun, moon and planets rotate around the body of the earth, but it is the earth which spins on its own axis...

Light waves from the sun outside the domed firmament of the earth,  and light waves from the moon inside the domed firmament of the earth, are the key to understanding the universe around us on this earth!

[Caroline]

Everyone is wrong!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkcSY-Lx-cc

[Reader]

How can cloud formations exist in front of, and behind the sun and the moon?

Eclipses are predicted very accurately using calculations based on the sun and the moon being at great distances from earth - far beyond the clouds. Anyway, airliners fly above most of the clouds and their passengers never see the sun or moon below them.

Reflected light from the moons surface appears capable of being bent, whereas direct sunlight always moves in straight lines with little or no prospect of deviation...

All light rays, including those directly from the sun can be bent very easily by a lens.

The sun must be outside the firmament, . . .

You earlier suggested that cloud formations can be seen to pass behind the sun. What is someone seeing when they spot the international space station using binoculars or a small telescope? How do you account for the observed movement of the stars and planets?

[mike tesko]

Eclipses are predicted very accurately using calculations based on the sun and the moon being at great distances from earth - far beyond the clouds. not if video footage exists showing cloud formationAnyway, airliners fly above most of the clouds and their passengers never see the sun or moon below them. This is not entirely true...
All light rays, including those directly from the sun can be bent very easily by a lens. Exactly,
the powers that be can android manipulate the truth...
You earlier suggested that cloud formations can be seen to pass behind the sun. Yes, the clouds have been captured behind the sun, and in front of it..What is someone seeing when they spot the international space station using binoculars or a small telescope? I don't honestly know.. How do you account for the observed movement of the stars and planets? I think they rotate against the imoveable earth's dome shaped..

Oh, yeah...

[Reader]

Video footage conveys appearance, but not distance. A similar appearance can easily be obtained by making a video of a white disk lit from above (brightly enough to cause slight over-exposure in the video footage) and having some steam drifting across between it and the camera.

[mike tesko]

Video footage conveys appearance, but not distance. A similar appearance can easily be obtained by making a video of a white disk lit from above (brightly enough to cause slight over-exposure in the video footage) and having some steam drifting across between it and the camera.

What you say could be possible, but I believe the footage posted up to be genuine, because I have observed this activity myself on several occasions. In the meantime, I shall be looking out for more video footage which displays these features (clouds behind and in front of the moon)..

[mike tesko]

What you say could be possible, but I believe the footage posted up to be genuine, because I have observed this activity myself on several occasions. In the meantime, I shall be looking out for more video footage which displays these features (clouds behind and in front of the moon)..

Consider the following proposition:-

First proposition

(a) - person 1 is stood on the surface of the earth in the spherical version
(b) - person 2 is stood on the exact opposite side of the globe at 180°
(c) - person 3 is stood on the earth 90° east of person 1, 90° west of person 2
(d) - person 4 is stood on the earth 90° west of person 1, 90° east of person 2
------------

Second proposition

(c) - person 2 is stood on the surface of the earth in the spherical version
(b) - person 3 is stood on the exact opposite side of the globe at 180°
(c) - person 4 is stood on the earth 90° east of person 2, 90° west of person 3
(d) - person 1 is stood on the earth 90° west of person 2, 90° east of person 3
------------

Third proposition

(a) - person 3 is stood on the surface of the earth in the spherical version
(b) - person 4 is stood on the exact opposite side of the globe at 180°
(c) - person 1 is stood on the earth 90° east of person 3, 90° west of person 4
(d) - person 2 is stood on the earth 90° west of person 3, 90° east of person 4
------------

Fourth proposition

(a) - person 4 is stood on the surface of the earth in the spherical version
(b) - person 1 is stood on the exact opposite side of the globe at 180°
(c) - person 3 is stood on the earth 90° east of person 4, 90° west of person 1
(d) - person 4 is stood on the earth 90° west of person 4, 90° east of person 1

Now, let's disect the globe into 4 individual regional quadrants, let's name these, 'W', 'X', 'Y', and 'Z'...

If it rains at the exact same time in each of these (W, X, Y and Z) 4 different regions, according to 'the earth is a globe community' as per the first proposition, the rain falls down from the sky up above, to the ground down below from person 1's perspective, the rain falls upward from the ground, and downward towards the sky in person 2's situation, and it rains sideways on East to West or vice versa with regards to persons 3 and 4 respectively! In other words, its raining in all different directions at one and the same time, with each person consciously thinking and or believing that it's raining from up above (the sky) and saturating the ground below!

In order for this to occur, the earth has to be a globe...

One person's perspective of the falling rain will not correspond in direction with another person's perspective involving the same rain, since in the four examples given, it rains down, it would rain up, it would rain sideways on from east to west, and or from West to east...

People would be standing upright with their feet on the ground beneath themselves, or be standing upside down with their feet firmly on the ground above them, or be standing sideways on, this way (east to west) or that way (west to east)! A person on one part of the global earth model would drive a car with its wheels firmly on the ground beneath them, whilst on the opposite side of the earth, the other person drives their car upside down, with the four wheels of the vehicle planted firmly on the ground above him!  Yet, still further, the person's driving cars east to west (or vice versa) of persons 1 and 2 (person's 3 and 4) would be driving cars with their wheels firmly planted on the ground sideways on to the other two persons (1 and 2)...

On and on I could go, with example after example, which if true would be truly startling and hard to believe that in different parts of the world similar events which must be occurring, are unfolding differently, right way up, upside down, side ways on, and yet if there was any prospect of this being true, for example, an aeroplane travelling from say the UK to Australia, would at some time have to flip over so that not only the aeroplane became upside down, but the passengers themselves would need to be rotated during that particular flight or journey - now, we know that this does not happen and because this does not happen, the earth cannot be a globe, it has to be fundamentally flat...

I am no mug, and I can work things out, I don't need NASa or any experts pulling the wool over my eyes!!!

I can think for myself...

[Jane]

Albeit your thinking is somewhat skewed