Documentary police evidence exists which confirms the phone at the farmhouse was 'off the hook' between 3.42am and about 5.55am...
Alternative documentary police evidence exists to show or indicate that at around 5.57am, the phone line at the farmhouse was reported as being 'engaged'...
By 6.09am, it does not matter whether the police asked the operator to patch the 'engaged' line through to the control room, or if the operator did this by her own judgement, the call could not have been patched through as defined unless it had been a '999' call in the first instance..
The so called 'eavesdrop' lasted from between 6.09am to 7.57am that same morning! It got terminated within 12 minutes of two bodies reportedly dead in the kitchen upon entry! One dead male, and one dead female, a murder, and a suicide (7.35am, 7.37am, 7.38am, 7.42am, and 7.45am messages and info' refers)! Why terminate the 'eavesdrop' at such a crucial stage in the proceedings? The answer to this question rests with the nature of the death of the female at and by that stage, reported as being dead in the kitchen, by way of a suicide, without any gun being present downstairs in the kitchen to support her suicde! Only a police weapon! The cut off of the 'eavesdrop at such a crucial stage in the proceedings conveniently serves to enable DCI Harris to talk with ACC 'Peter' Simpson using the round finger dial phone in the kitchen! What did Harris and Simpson talk about? How long did this conversation last? Why are Essex police so reluctant to want to talk about what Harris and Simpson must have been talking about?
What happened between 7.57am when the 'eavesdrop' which had been on going from as long ago as 6.09am, got terminated, and 8.10am when the other threee bodies of the five victims got discovered upstairs, and in turn what took place between 8.10am the discovery of bodies three, four and five, and 8.44am when the police surgeon, Dr Craig arrived to pronounce the five victims all as being dead? Essex police are hiding something sinister! They know they shot Sheila Caffell, they know they are responsible for killing her! They know that Sheila did shoot and over power and kill the other four victims! You could not make up the sort of things which leap out of the file in this case at you! Things which were recorded contemporaneously, not fabricated with the benefit of malice aforethought, as per the dodgy police witness statement accounts, many of which are composite versions of their supposed evidence that many probably never even saw or knew the contents of! There is no valid evidence which supports Jeremy Bamber as being the killer of these five victims! Its all dodgy, fabricated wishful thinking on the part of almost every prosecution witness relied upon during the trial. If I saw one miniscule fact or reason which serves to confirm Jeremy Bambers guilt in these matters I would have fallen into the guilters camp long long ago! I would have condemned him, with good reason for doing so! But there is no reliable evidence, not one shred that he shot, beat, or that he overpowered and killed anybody in cold blood, or that he somehow was able to trick the police into shooting his sister dead, and make the police, senior officers amongst those responsible for Sheila Caffells death, into thinking that Sheila had somehow committed suicide? Committed suicide when the cops had shot her? Committed suicide when the cops had staged her death to make it look like she had taken her own life, when in fact by virtue of close scrutiny anyone can see that she had not taken her own life - she had been killed by another! Cops were quite happy whilstever the case was being processed through the Coroners Court System! Their problems started once the matter became a criminal investigation! By then a lot of water had gone under the bridge, they were in too deeep to do a 'U' turn. Encouraged by suspicious relatives, cops threw Jeremy Bamber to the wolves...