I am with you there nugnug. Also, who would know from the reporting that she had a co defendant in the proceedings?! Has he been mentioned? What I dislike is that in much of the reporting, the actual evidence is a side issue, with many of the US networks treating this like some kind of soap opera. We only have to wait until tomorrow for the result but whatever it is, can we be really confident that the process was untainted by all this sh*t? The US seems in no rush to judge the decisions of its own system, yet they are queueing up to cry fowl here. I have been surprised by what has been allowed in evidence in this case but the motivations report from the original case is hundreds of pages, so they had to justify their findings, as will be the case with the appeal.