Last chance: Questions on the relatives fabricating the silencer:

[guest2181]

Hello Adam
what a silly notion  blood being taken from a bucket of soaking clothes.  IMO the silencer was not used and I suspect the blood was from a rabbit not Sheila.

It was identified as human blood Susan.

[susan]

It was identified as human blood Susan.

Hi Hartley

sorry about that I thought I had read later it was identified as rabbit's blood must be another of my pipe dreams Thanks for putting me right.

[Adam]

Hi Hartley

sorry about that I thought I had read later it was identified as rabbit's blood must be another of my pipe dreams Thanks for putting me right.

Rabbit's blood 

It was Sheila's blood.

The relatives did not fabricate the silencer. They had no access to -

Sheila's blood.

Crime scene pictures of the kitchen.

How to insert into a silencer.

Crime scene information on -

Blood on/off the rifle end
Who received contact shots.
Rifle lenght.
Sheila's arm lenght.
Other evidence pointing towards guilt or innocence.

[susan]

Rabbit's blood 

It was Sheila's blood.

The relatives did not fabricate the silencer. They had no access to -

Sheila's blood.

Crime scene pictures of the kitchen.

How to insert into a silencer.

Crime scene information on -

Blood on/off the rifle end
Who received contact shots.
Rifle lenght.
Sheila's arm lenght.
Other evidence pointing towards guilt or innocence.

Adam hahaha rabbits blood indeed what am I like.  I never said the relatives fabricated the blood in the silencer I have always thought the silencer was not used.

[Adam]

Adam hahaha rabbits blood indeed what am I like.  I never said the relatives fabricated the blood in the silencer I have always thought the silencer was not used.

How did Sheila's blood and the aga paint get on it if the relatives didn't put it there ?

[susan]

How did Sheila's blood and the aga paint get on it if the relatives didn't put it there ?

Adam you sound as if you think the relatives engineered evidence with regard to blood and paint on the silencer you must think the silencer was not used then along with me I knew you would come round to my way of thinking.

[Adam]

Adam you sound as if you think the relatives engineered evidence with regard to blood and paint on the silencer you must think the silencer was not used then along with me I knew you would come round to my way of thinking.

It's ok, now the relatives have been ruled out, you can still support Bamber.

This will have to be on the basis that Stan Jones fabricated the silencer. Which several people have accused him of doing.

[susan]

It's ok, now the relatives have been ruled out, you can still support Bamber.

This will have to be on the basis that Stan Jones fabricated the silencer. Which several people have accused him of doing.

Adam thank you I will still support Jeremy Bamber because I feel he is innocent and was wrongly convicted.  It is not for me to say who fabricated the silencer somebody did as I feel it was not used who would murder their entire family then go to the trouble to put the silencer back in its box and open a deep cupboard and put it to the back (Vidvic told me the cupboard was very deep) it does not make sense if Jeremy had carried out the murders he would want out of WHF as fast as and if Sheila why not take the silencer off the rifle place it near to where she was and shoot herself with the rifle it would not matter to Sheila if people knew she had used a siilencer what difference Adam.

[Adam]

Adam thank you I will still support Jeremy Bamber because I feel he is innocent and was wrongly convicted.  It is not for me to say who fabricated the silencer somebody did as I feel it was not used who would murder their entire family then go to the trouble to put the silencer back in its box and open a deep cupboard and put it to the back (Vidvic told me the cupboard was very deep) it does not make sense if Jeremy had carried out the murders he would want out of WHF as fast as and if Sheila why not take the silencer off the rifle place it near to where she was and shoot herself with the rifle it would not matter to Sheila if people knew she had used a siilencer what difference Adam.

You need to say who fabricated the silencer. And then justify it by saying how. Rather than just say I believe Bamber is innocent but can't explain the silencer evidence.

As I said, ruling out the relatives, which you have to do, means you can join Mike & others in accusing Stan Jones.

[susan]

You need to say who fabricated the silencer. And then justify it by saying how. Rather than just say I believe Bamber is innocent but can't explain the silencer evidence.

As I said, ruling out the relatives, which you have to do, means you can join Mike & others in accusing Stan Jones.

Adam sorry I will not join others and accuse anyone of anything I don't know and to be honest neither do you.  I have always thought and said IMO the silencer was not used all I did was apply logic as to why it was not used.  I believe Sheila murdered her family then herself for anyone to beable to murder two wee boys when they were peaceful in their beds had to be mentally disturbed and I don't think JB was for all his bad points which I have always put down to him being silly immature and arrogant but not a murderer.This is of course my opinion which is my right to have one

[Adam]

Adam sorry I will not join others and accuse anyone of anything I don't know and to be honest neither do you.  I have always thought and said IMO the silencer was not used all I did was apply logic as to why it was not used.  I believe Sheila murdered her family then herself for anyone to beable to murder two wee boys when they were peaceful in their beds had to be mentally disturbed and I don't think JB was for all his bad points which I have always put down to him being silly immature and arrogant but not a murderer.This is of course my opinion which is my right to have one

You need to address or undermine the evidence.  Just saying you believe the silencer was not used is not enough.

The paint and blood evidence shows the silencer was used.

Either Stan Jones fabricated the silencer and asked the relatives to lie in their WS's & say they found it. This serious accusation needs to be comprehensivly supported.

Or Bamber committed the massacre. Which is already supported with a mountain of other evidence.

[susan]

You need to address or undermine the evidence.  Just saying you believe the silencer was not used is not enough.

The paint and blood evidence shows the silencer was used.

Either Stan Jones fabricated the silencer and asked the relatives to lie in their WS's & say they found it. This serious accusation needs to be comprehensivly supported.

Or Bamber committed the massacre. Which is already supported with a mountain of other evidence.

Adam what mountain of evidence exists that Bamber murdered his family he was convicted on the silencer evidence and Julie's evidence and I believe none of it.

[Adam]

Adam what mountain of evidence exists that Bamber murdered his family he was convicted on the silencer evidence and Julie's evidence and I believe none of it.

I've directed you to the library several times. There is also a mountain of circumstantial evidence. One alive suspect with several motives, an opportunity & no alibi. Together with a witness.

Back to the silencer. Do you believe Stan Jones fabricated it & asked the relatived to lie in their WS's. Or that Bamber committed the massacre ?

It has to be one or the other ?

[David1819]

Adam what mountain of evidence exists that Bamber murdered his family he was convicted on the silencer evidence and Julie's evidence and I believe none of it.

That's the problem. Adam just says 'there is a mountain in the library' and hopes you don't look -



Because there is nothing there.

[David1819]

Hello Adam
what a silly notion  blood being taken from a bucket of soaking clothes.  IMO the silencer was not used and I suspect the blood was from a rabbit not Sheila.

Blood from a rabbit? I think you got your silly notions mixed up.