Author Topic: Bamber v Bews  (Read 12253 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #45 on: May 19, 2011, 11:48:PM »
Who s luap ?

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #46 on: May 19, 2011, 11:50:PM »
Hartley

You mentioned before that WHF is screened by lalandi, any idea if this was so in 1985? And am i right in thinking the window JB and Bews are talking about faces East?

Anyone, do we know what the moon was upto on the night of the murders? And was it cloudy or clear skies?

No faces South.

The Leyllandii are to the north, they were there in photos from 85 they are approx 30-40 metres from the house though.

Do a search for 'resurrected thread' I found out what the moon was doing on that thread, from memory it was three quarters, rising from the east and directly overhead at 4am.

In Bews's interview on the link i just posted, he says back of the farmhouse, top right window. Is that facing south? And he doesn't mention moon, he says a trick of the light.

It was a clear night, so three quarter moon would give reasonable visibility, good enough to cycle down a path.  :)

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #47 on: May 19, 2011, 11:51:PM »
Who s luap ?

Thats Paul, who did change to Paul-not paulg, but now is luap. He's having an identity crisis. :)

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #48 on: May 19, 2011, 11:54:PM »
Well that's unclear then, that description to me would indicate the twins room, but I was under the impression it was the master bedroom which is the top left window of the south elevation, same elevation as the principal front door.

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #49 on: May 19, 2011, 11:57:PM »
Thanks for that paulg as always.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #50 on: May 19, 2011, 11:57:PM »
Theres no hedge and field on the back (west) only on the front (south), I thought they hid behind a hedge?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2011, 11:58:PM by Hartley »

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #51 on: May 19, 2011, 11:59:PM »
Well that's unclear then, that description to me would indicate the twins room, but I was under the impression it was the master bedroom which is the top left window of the south elevation, same elevation as the principal front door.

I see from that thread you linked, this is ground thats been gone over.

Have you watched/listened to this interview? Could you have a listen again if yes, it might help to clear up the bedroom/window.

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #52 on: May 20, 2011, 12:03:AM »
Thanks for that paulg as always.

No worries

Late night tonight, or off soon?

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #53 on: May 20, 2011, 12:08:AM »
Thanks for that paulg as always.

No worries


Am in bed now!  Accessing forum on iPhone. But not very good at it, taking me ages to read and reply!!

But what is really bad is the fact that I'm watching WBC, oh the shame!!!!

Late night tonight, or off soon?

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #54 on: May 20, 2011, 12:12:AM »
Well that's unclear then, that description to me would indicate the twins room, but I was under the impression it was the master bedroom which is the top left window of the south elevation, same elevation as the principal front door.

I see from that thread you linked, this is ground thats been gone over.

Have you watched/listened to this interview? Could you have a listen again if yes, it might help to clear up the bedroom/window.

Yep. It's the master bed, south elevation, top left.

He said top right as if you were in the house looking out, he said rear because it kind of is the rear from approach by Pages Ln, but it's the principal elevation.

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #55 on: May 20, 2011, 12:15:AM »
Theres no hedge and field on the back (west) only on the front (south), I thought they hid behind a hedge?

There's no mention of a hedge, no backlight, and no moon, just a trick of the light.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #56 on: May 20, 2011, 12:19:AM »
Theres no hedge and field on the back (west) only on the front (south), I thought they hid behind a hedge?

There's no mention of a hedge, no backlight, and no moon, just a trick of the light.

Not in that interview no. I think its in Bews statement, not sure though my minds turned to mush.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2011, 12:22:AM by Hartley »

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #57 on: May 20, 2011, 12:32:AM »
Well that's unclear then, that description to me would indicate the twins room, but I was under the impression it was the master bedroom which is the top left window of the south elevation, same elevation as the principal front door.

I see from that thread you linked, this is ground thats been gone over.

Have you watched/listened to this interview? Could you have a listen again if yes, it might help to clear up the bedroom/window.

Yep. It's the master bed, south elevation, top left.

He said top right as if you were in the house looking out, he said rear because it kind of is the rear from approach by Pages Ln, but it's the principal elevation.

Listen again mate, he says, "as we're looking at the back of the building, top right". He does say "we look out", but i think he meant to say "we look up",as he gestures upwards with his hand.

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #58 on: May 20, 2011, 12:37:AM »
Yes he does but I think he's describing it badly, the images which cut in and zoom to a window, its the master bedroom window that it shows.

The hedge and field are from the first post in this thread, not Bews.

Offline paulg

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 605
Re: Bamber v Bews
« Reply #59 on: May 20, 2011, 12:39:AM »
Yes he does but I think he's describing it badly, the images which cut in and zoom to a window, its the master bedroom window that it shows.

The hedge and field are from the first post in this thread, not Bews.

But thats just the film...

Have we got Bews statement on here anywhere, sorry to be a pain.