Police V family

[lookout]

Jeremy is delighted by the MOUNTAINS of mail he receives each week from supporters.

[lookout]

" Jim " a poster who pops onto the forum now and again gave his sixpenn'orth on Twitter about EP ignoring all the requests and he suggested "making an application to commit the Chief Constable to prison " Not a bad idea--------if it were to work.

[JackiePreece]

I don't condone all of their activities.

But you have chosen to quote certain OCT members who I personally have found to be dishonest

[JackiePreece]

Both supporters & guilters have found it puzzling that a 360 degree stance change was made on this basis. But Caroline is not going to budge.

As the 6 posters who changed stance to guilty will tell you, there is no easy way to do it.

In the grand scheme of things Caroline changing stance has made no difference to Jeremys case being referred to the court of appeal or not
She made no difference when she thought Jeremy was innocent and has not put forward any argument that proves Jeremy is guilty

Would you like to name the people who you believe have changed their stance

[Roch]

But you have chosen to quote certain OCT members who I personally have found to be dishonest

I haven't quoted anything they have said. I just referred to two people.  I can only speak as I find. I think many people in life use that kind of approach to gauge other people.

[JackiePreece]

I haven't quoted anything they have said. I just referred to two people.  I can only speak as I find. I think many people in life use that kind of approach to gauge other people.

Same

[Caroline]

In the grand scheme of things Caroline changing stance has made no difference to Jeremys case being referred to the court of appeal or not
She made no difference when she thought Jeremy was innocent and has not put forward any argument that proves Jeremy is guilty

Would you like to name the people who you believe have changed their stance

 

[David1819]

OK, so if you ask me a question and I provide you with the answer 'I know you asked a particular question but I can't remember it, however, I think the answer was 'I didn't or No' - that should be enough for you? When I could quite simply have re-read your post?

You should have read the letters properly the first time XXXXX! When I first asked the question he didn't answer it at all - he answered ALL questions and left the wallet question out! He initially said he didn't have the letter with him but would answer some of the questions when he got back to his cell - which he did EXCEPT the wallet question. I had to ask again and that is when he said he couldn't remember the question.

In the queue to be ashamed, I'm a LONG way behind you. You really need to quit this obsession - you're making me feel nauseous!

He dodged the question whether you like it or not!

Nice try. But its going in the myth trash with all the other stuff you've made up.

he avoided answering the question about the wallet

The list on this is massive

No, I will be making a list

it is an impossibility to shoot yourself with a rifle at a 45 degree angle

defo June's foot but Andrew Hunter claimed it was Sheila's.

I know who was responsible for the article that claimed the feet were Sheila's - I think he is wrong and I think the police are just letting the supporters hang themselves. Why should they deny it when it's obvious if you're not wearing blinkers!

[Adam]

In the grand scheme of things Caroline changing stance has made no difference to Jeremys case being referred to the court of appeal or not
She made no difference when she thought Jeremy was innocent and has not put forward any argument that proves Jeremy is guilty

Would you like to name the people who you believe have changed their stance

Caroline, Jane J, Susan, Maggie, Grahame, Alias, Harters/Hartley.

Alias changed to 'undecided' as she believes Bamber would have let Sheila live rather than shoot her twice.

Grahame left the forum saying he 'has to give in to his betters' before returning claiming the police framed Bamber.

[Adam]

David changed to innocent due to a palm print on the bible which went on to become his mysterious 'forensic evidence breakthrough'.

This evidence is so strong he's apparently had meetings with Bamber's lawyers.

[susan]

Caroline, Jane J, Susan, Maggie, Grahame, Alias, Harters/Hartley.

Alias changed to 'undecided' as she believes Bamber would have let Sheila live rather than shoot her twice.

Grahame left the forum saying he 'has to give in to his betters' before returning claiming the police framed Bamber.

Adam  Grahame is very much on the Jeremy innocent side and left the forum as he found it was all getting him down and making him ill.  I myself am 50/50 and I seem to think Maggie is the same but she will need to confirm this.  I think it is always better to look at the case from both sides and to leave your mind open to new evidence being found don't rush to knock posts than cannot be proved either way as we have plenty of those from guilty and innocent posters lets see what David comes up with and of course Roch  who has been posting on here longer than you or I and his knowledge on the case is far greater than mine.

[lookout]

Yiiippppeeeee.

[Roch]

Roch  who has been posting on here longer than you or I and his knowledge on the case is far greater than mine.

Technically, I do not think that my knowledge on the case is better than many other long term posters - including your self.  There are some members who pour over statements and transcripts etc. and are technically proficient regarding that type of evidence on this forum.

[Caroline]

Nice try. But its going in the myth trash with all the other stuff you've made up.

Did I make up that your report was about the palm print  ? The myth bin is where most of your BS lives, that is the stuff you haven't piggy backed from others. You're a regular culprit of only posting a section of a document that you think backs up your argument and never post links to the original - totally dishonest and sneaky individual. The avoidance of the wallet question is FACT - live with it!

[susan]

Technically, I do not think that my knowledge on the case is better than many other long term posters - including your self.  There are some members who pour over statements and transcripts etc. and are technically proficient regarding that type of evidence on this forum.

Hahaha Roch you are too modest my friend I never pour over statements and transcripts due to my snail like internet connection I think we all perceive posts as fits our way of thinking.