Author Topic: Reason to believe cops shot Sheila, and how her blood ended up inside Silencer!  (Read 78619 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
I don't believe that in the true circumstances of how an unarmed Sheila Caffell was originally shot downstairs in the kitchen by a cop gun, that cops could have justified shooting her, in view of the fact that just prior to them shooting her in the kitchen, Sheila had signalled to the police surrounding the farmhouse her intention to give herself up by showing the rifle at the first floor box room window, and then making her way downstairs to the kitchen to hand herself over to the police! She was affectively acting under a truce of white flag at the time cops shot her! The anshuzt rifle was still resting against the first floor box room window at the time cops pronounced her death downstairs in the kitchen, 7.35am, 7.37am and 7.38am! It stands to reason therefore that Sheila was not originally shot by use of the anshuzt rifle in the kitchen, when the rifle which supposedly inflicted both shots was resting against a first floor box room window upstairs!

Cops got their ballistic expert Fletcher to tamper with one of the two bullets used in Sheila's demise, so that it could be claimed that both bullets had been fired by the same anshuzt rifle! It didn't matter apparantly that the pathologist 'Peter' Veniz' had removed a piece of badly fragmented bullet bearing his exhibit reference PV/20, which by 20th September 1975 had mysteriously become transformed into a whole bullet, which enabled the police ballistic expert, Fletcher to conclude that both bullets (PV/20 and PV/19) had been fired from the anshuzt rifle, when the truth is only bullet PV/19 was!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
I've had no dealings with them. I think they are in a very difficult position caught in-between the various agencies but I don't always condone the line they take on different things.  I recently criticised one of their videos - while praising another.

I think in the long run you will find that on several issues - you were maybe not so much led up the garden path as you think.  You have to try and understand that for the defence - solving the case is like piecing together a massive and partly damaged jigsaw with pieces missing. 

The very sad fact is that some people knew pretty much what the truth was from the very beginning (I'm not referring to Jeremy and Stan).

Maybe not but you appear to be singing from the same song sheet.

Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Maybe not but you appear to be singing from the same song sheet.


Something about a jigsaw and missing pieces here, I think. Can't quite put my finger on it.


Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Maybe not but you appear to be singing from the same song sheet.

How does that indicate I am wrong?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579

Something about a jigsaw and missing pieces here, I think. Can't quite put my finger on it.

I've always used similar language about the position the defence has found itself in.

guest7363

  • Guest



guest7363

  • Guest




I hadn't seen that Justice,many thanks. Stark reality.
Its ok Lookout, I'm all heart and shows how fair I am.  I was hoping to take over from Mike when he retires, so I'm changing stance.

guest2181

  • Guest
Its ok Lookout, I'm all heart and shows how fair I am.  I was hoping to take over from Mike when he retires, so I'm changing stance.

Me too (Im very competitive)  ;D

guest7363

  • Guest
Me too (Im very competitive)  ;D
That rules me out then  >:(

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
How does that indicate I am wrong?

I think it's best I don't say any more  :-X
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest2181

  • Guest
That rules me out then  >:(

Oh okay then I concede, all yours.  :))

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Its ok Lookout, I'm all heart and shows how fair I am.  I was hoping to take over from Mike when he retires, so I'm changing stance.





Ever the joker,eh ?  ;D ;D ;D I know you're fair Justice,it's me that's the nagger. When I have a fixation about something,I remain rigid/immovable and stick to my guns to the bitter end.

guest7363

  • Guest




Ever the joker,eh ?  ;D ;D ;D I know you're fair Justice,it's me that's the nagger. When I have a fixation about something,I remain rigid/immovable and stick to my guns to the bitter end.
I bet your a right laugh Lookout really :))