Murders at White House Farm by Carol Ann Lee.

[Caroline]

Here is another of Adam's straw-man arguments.  It's easy all you do is take previous comment's totally unconnected, add them together with total conjecture, post it and expect the original poster to come back and fight their way out of it.  I'ts not exactly lying but it's certainly economy with the truth and mischeivous.

Bee-ayve!
Hoots!

Are you only reading and commenting on Adam's scenarios?

[guest1199]

Are you only reading and commenting on Adam's scenarios?

Hi Caroline

I particularly resent Adams tactic of straw-man arguments, I've posted another example of that particular tactic so it's not just me he does this with.  I hope that the moderator on this forum can take it into account.

On the other hand, if you look just upthread you will notice that I thanked you for your theory of the crime.  I will certainly give it due consideration.

Hoots!

[Caroline]

Hi Caroline

I particularly resent Adams tactic of straw-man arguments, I've posted another example of that particular tactic so it's not just me he does this with.  I hope that the moderator on this forum can take it into account.

On the other hand, if you look just upthread you will notice that I thanked you for your theory of the crime.  I will certainly give it due consideration.

Hoots!

Hi Tom, soz - I missed you comment and cheers!

[Adam]

Here is another of Adam's straw-man arguments.  It's easy all you do is take previous comment's totally unconnected, add them together with total conjecture, post it and expect the original poster to come back and fight their way out of it.  I'ts not exactly lying but it's certainly economy with the truth and mischeivous.

He suckered me upthread with this tactic, he won't be doing it again!

Bee-ayve!
Hoots!

Well it's a fact JackieD recently copied and pasted a long section from a book called 'An Innocent Man'. I preferred to read an unbiased book.

You have read CAL's book & have so far come up with complete rubbish.

I'm sorry but Nevill reveiving his first two shots from inches away in the lip & jaw does not make Bamber innocent. Unless Nevill didn't notice a raging woman in a nightie & carrying a long rifle coming towards him. I always thought she was on Haloperidol.
 

[Adam]

So if you take into account the eight points that Adam made, you can then offer the straw-man argument in his own style, that he thinks that JB is guilty simply because the bunny population at WHF didn't testify in court for the defence.

Hoots

What available weapon should he have used ?

You have said he chose the wrong one.

[Adam]

Altnough TomG posts a lot of rubbish, he's actually made a point about the lightness of the weapon.

It would have beneffitted Bamber who wanted to move quickly around WHF. As previously posted.

However to cause the horrific face & body damage Nevill received with such a light rifle in the kitchen fight, would have required extreme force.

Sheila was a recoveting anorexic on Haloperidol. So doubtful she could wave around a tin of sardines.

Hoots.

[Adam]

TomG had also suggested Bamber would not have emerged from a big fight with Nevill unscratched. Although has not said how Sheila managed to.

I will copy my thread on this. I do wish he would keep up.

I will also quote TomG's post on this as he often denies saying things.

[Adam]

All the above along with the fact that the gun and ammunition were totally inappropriate makes your (A), (B), and (C) implausible.  He would also have had to emerge from all this without a scratch on him from a die-hard Nevill.  The pro-guilt argument is further compounded by the fact that the pre-laid plan that you continually refer to simply doesn't exist.

Hoots

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8311.msg395436.html#msg395436

Look forward to TomG's response.

[susan]

Altnough TomG posts a lot of rubbish, he's actually made a point about the lightness of the weapon.

It would have beneffitted Bamber who wanted to move quickly around WHF. As previously posted.

However to cause the horrific face & body damage Nevill received with such a light rifle in the kitchen fight, would have required extreme force.

Sheila was a recoveting anorexic on Haloperidol. So doubtful she could wave around a tin of sardines.

Hoots.

Hello Adam source please confirming Sheila was a recovering anorexic and a light weapon would benefit Sheila more than Jeremy.

[Adam]

What available weapon should he have used ?

You have said he chose the wrong one.

Same question to Roch. Who has also said Bamber chose the wrong weapon. But has never offerred any alternatives despite being asked.

[guest1199]

What available weapon should he have used ?

You have said he chose the wrong one.

This sounds like more straw-man argument.  He didn't use any weapon, all were inappropriate, he didn't do the crime.  Can you quote where I suggested that JB had opted for the wrong choice of weapon.

Hoots!

[Adam]

Hello Adam source please confirming Sheila was a recovering anorexic and a light weapon would benefit Sheila more than Jeremy.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.spectator.co.uk/2012/04/lack-of-appeal/&ved=0ahUKEwiGp_q2443UAhXKDsAKHfVnBrAQFggcMAA&usg=AFQjCNHoQUl_IVv41KN7TQYC1Nvki6l5kw

Err, I never said a light weapon would benefit Bamber more than Sheila. I said Bamber chose a light weapon as he had to move quickly.

Bamber's vastly superior strenght would mean only he could cause the damage to Nevill with a light rifle.

[guest1199]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8311.msg395436.html#msg395436

Look forward to TomG's response.

I don't know what you're referring to, you have posted a link to another part of the thread.

Hoots

[Adam]

This sounds like more straw-man argument.  He didn't use any weapon, all were inappropriate, he didn't do the crime.  Can you quote where I suggested that JB had opted for the wrong choice of weapon.

Hoots!

Can you answer my question. What rifle should Bamber have used ?