Author Topic: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?  (Read 1232 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« on: April 23, 2017, 12:25:PM »
Reasons why Bamber would not get injured:

He was wearing shoes.

He was wearing protective clothing.

He would have hands and head protection. Gloves & a balaclava.

He was physically as strong as Nevill.

He was mentally alert and not on Haloperidol.

He was physically alert & not on Haloperidol.

Nevill did not have the chance to restrain Bamber prior to being shot four times. 

The fight was 'ferocious' however Bamber could defend himself if he needed to.

Bamber was not checked for a long time.



Reasons why Sheila would get injured:

She was bare footed.

She was half the size of Nevill.

Nevill was a lot stronger.

She had no protective clothing.

She had no head or hand protection.

A fully fit Nevill had the option of physically confronting Sheila prior to shots being fired. This is what was suggested happened yesterday. It would be a million to one that a fully fit Nevill would lose this confrontation. 

Sheila had no physical co ordinaton due to Haloperidol.

Sheila had no mental alertness due to Haloperidol.

The fight was 'ferocious' and was 'life or death'. One person dying with horrific injuries while Sheila had no injuries is not credible.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 12:44:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2017, 12:27:PM »
This thread had to be created as posters are saying Sheila had as much chance as Bamber of avoiding injury in the kitchen. However there are 18 reasons why this is incorrect.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 12:32:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2017, 12:28:PM »
Sheila hadn't been physically disabled !!

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2017, 12:42:PM »
Sheila hadn't been physically disabled !!

Sheila was on Haloperidol Lookout. Which has at least 60 mental or physical side effects.

Nugs said Sheila had to be suffering from all 60 to not be able to function. This is incorrect. It is a powerful drug & if Sheila was experiencing 20 side effects, mentally & physically she could not perform basic functions.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 12:43:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2017, 01:37:PM »
Sheila was on Haloperidol Lookout. Which has at least 60 mental or physical side effects.

Nugs said Sheila had to be suffering from all 60 to not be able to function. This is incorrect. It is a powerful drug & if Sheila was experiencing 20 side effects, mentally & physically she could not perform basic functions.





List the " 60 " side-effects.

Don't you kid yourself on the lack of strength !

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2017, 01:55:PM »




List the " 60 " side-effects.

Don't you kid yourself on the lack of strength !

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8254.0.html

It's all in the recent 'Effects of Haloperidol' thread.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2017, 02:06:PM »
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8254.0.html

It's all in the recent 'Effects of Haloperidol' thread.





You stick to your thoughts on the subject,I'll stick to mine.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2017, 02:20:PM »
Reasons why Bamber would not get injured:

He was not involved.


Reasons why Sheila would not get injured:

Neville was already shot four times. Twice fatally.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2017, 02:40:PM »
Reasons why Bamber would not get injured:

He was not involved.


Reasons why Sheila would not get injured:

Neville was already shot four times. Twice fatally.

The opposite would also be true.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Who was most likely to get injured in the kitchen ?
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2017, 02:46:PM »
>>>>>>>I keep getting " insecure site " notices.This one and twitter " uses invalid security certificate ".
It's happening during " Intermittent sync " through Talk Talk and driving me mad  >:( >:(