Author Topic: Witheld Docs  (Read 23465 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #195 on: July 02, 2017, 02:51:PM »




It's called drip-feeding.

When it's wrong it's call bollox.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #196 on: July 02, 2017, 04:58:PM »
When it's wrong it's call bollox.





It's not surprising.Your answer to everything.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #197 on: July 02, 2017, 05:02:PM »




It's not surprising.Your answer to everything.

Where necessary.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #198 on: November 24, 2017, 07:39:PM »
Tracked it down - the Canada drugs claim is from the OS (posted below), they make reference to a COLP document BUT haven't posted it. Again, it's who do you believe and without evidence to back it up, it's just words. Canada isn't a usual place to smuggle drugs from and having worked there for quite some time, I know that they have a strict drugs security at the airports and everyone gets to meet the sniffer dogs! Although they may not do so at EVERY airport and of course it may have been less secure in 1985.

"Back in 1991 the City of London Police had investigated Essex Police they detailed a list of crimes which Julie had confessed to carrying out undetected These included, taking cannabis, selling cannabis, accessory to burglary at the caravan park, smuggling drugs back into the UK from Canada, and cheque book fraud. (11) Julie Mugford was never charged with any of these offences officially, but documents newly surfaced show that she was charged with burglary and this was withdrawn with permission from the DPP’s office, in the same document Julie is also advised she will be called as a prosecution witness. At the 2002 appeal the Defence put forward the suggestion that Julie Mugford and her friend and co-fraudster Susan Battersby had been given immunity from prosecution as a trade off for Julie’s testimony against Jeremy Bamber but the documents relating to this were under Public Interest Immunity. (12)"

Is this what you are talking about Lookout? Have you seen the COLP document or are you just parroting that lot?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #199 on: November 24, 2017, 07:46:PM »
I might have seen the said document.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #200 on: November 24, 2017, 07:46:PM »
Is this what you are talking about Lookout? Have you seen the COLP document or are you just parroting that lot?
Oh so it’s from the OS then Caroline, says it all now, I’ve just wasted precious time looking for it.  I don’t think anyone should accuse without posting evidence.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #201 on: November 24, 2017, 07:58:PM »
I might have seen the said document.

Then you should be able to find it.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #202 on: November 24, 2017, 08:05:PM »
When it's wrong it's call bollox.
:)) :)) :))

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #203 on: November 24, 2017, 08:11:PM »
Oh so it’s from the OS then Caroline, says it all now, I’ve just wasted precious time looking for it.  I don’t think anyone should accuse without posting evidence.


And they should know the difference -before they make erroneous claims- between a document and a report of what someone says is in a document.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #204 on: November 24, 2017, 08:21:PM »
Not really. 

I believe Mike Tesko is capable of being accurate as well as misleading.

It comes down to a matter of sifting through what is claimed.  Sorting the wheat from the chaff.
good on you roch ive been trying to sort the wheat from chaff from mike's posts since i joined and i still have not mastered it ;)

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #205 on: November 24, 2017, 08:33:PM »
Then you should be able to find it.

Have you tried Poppy Millers blog? That's where a lot of the bollox comes from - especially with regard to COLP interviews.

And aliens.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #206 on: November 24, 2017, 08:41:PM »
Have you tried Poppy Millers blog? That's where a lot of the bollox comes from - especially with regard to COLP interviews.

And aliens.

No, I'm not in the market for a conspiracy theory today - maybe tomorrow?  ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #207 on: November 24, 2017, 08:44:PM »
No, I'm not in the market for a conspiracy theory today - maybe tomorrow?  ;D ;D

 ;D

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #208 on: November 24, 2017, 08:58:PM »
Have you tried Poppy Millers blog? That's where a lot of the bollox comes from - especially with regard to COLP interviews.

And aliens.
:)) :)) :))

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #209 on: November 24, 2017, 09:40:PM »
Depends who the teacher was.