Author Topic: Witheld Docs  (Read 23554 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #135 on: July 01, 2017, 02:40:PM »
To be fair though - you have relied upon it yourself (if I am not mistaken).  He confirmed about the panic alarm.  He may have genuinely helped to confirm other aspects for you as well (I'm guessing).

Facts come from all people and all walks of life, imho.

He told me there was no panic button but it wasn't until Vidvic had it confirmed by AE that it was accepted.

Maybe you didn't understand what I meant, I think a certain level of caution should be used when quoting Jeremy. It's in HIS best interest to have people believe there was a figure at the window so if guilty, he'll play on that. The panic alarm is benign - but don't forget how long he avoided answering about wallet. I also asked him about selling pictures of Sheila - I'm still waiting for a reply to that.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #136 on: July 01, 2017, 03:04:PM »
He told me there was no panic button but it wasn't until Vidvic had it confirmed by AE that it was accepted.

Maybe you didn't understand what I meant, I think a certain level of caution should be used when quoting Jeremy. It's in HIS best interest to have people believe there was a figure at the window so if guilty, he'll play on that. The panic alarm is benign - but don't forget how long he avoided answering about wallet. I also asked him about selling pictures of Sheila - I'm still waiting for a reply to that.

Fair points.  Though with regard to the wallet - I did kind of empathise with his reasons for the delay.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #137 on: July 01, 2017, 04:03:PM »
Fair points.  Though with regard to the wallet - I did kind of empathise with his reasons for the delay.

Roch
IMO if JB did try and sell nude pictures of his sister this does not make him a murderer from the start Vic said the farmhouse did have a panic button but then he apologised and corrected himself to saying no panic button and I thought Jeremy had said this too.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #138 on: July 01, 2017, 04:10:PM »
Roch
IMO if JB did try and sell nude pictures of his sister this does not make him a murderer from the start Vic said the farmhouse did have a panic button but then he apologised and corrected himself to saying no panic button and I thought Jeremy had said this too.

Bamber sold everything he could from Sheila's flat. While Colin Caffell was not around. He told CC he needed the money.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #139 on: July 01, 2017, 04:12:PM »
He told me there was no panic button but it wasn't until Vidvic had it confirmed by AE that it was accepted.

Maybe you didn't understand what I meant, I think a certain level of caution should be used when quoting Jeremy. It's in HIS best interest to have people believe there was a figure at the window so if guilty, he'll play on that. The panic alarm is benign - but don't forget how long he avoided answering about wallet. I also asked him about selling pictures of Sheila - I'm still waiting for a reply to that.

No you didn't
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #140 on: July 01, 2017, 04:15:PM »
Bamber sold everything he could from Sheila's flat. While Colin Caffell was not around. He told CC he needed the money.




Yes-----he needed the money to pay for the £hundreds in death duties and funerals.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #141 on: July 01, 2017, 04:17:PM »
It's pretty obvious the one piece of evidence Roch says he has but won't divulge, is to do with forgery & framing.  Both within & outside of EP.

There is no way one piece of evidence from Roch can negate the 200+ pieces of incriminating evidence that has already been published & submitted at trial & at appeals. Unless it shows deliberate forgery.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2017, 04:28:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #142 on: July 01, 2017, 04:19:PM »



Yes-----he needed the money to pay for the £hundreds in death duties and funerals.

Is that why he bought a consignment of cannabis in Amsterdam as well. Or was that for his jolly ups ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #143 on: July 01, 2017, 04:23:PM »
Is that why he bought a consignment of cannabis in Amsterdam as well. Or was that for his jolly ups ?





What " consignment " was that then.? Holidays don't have anything to do with it,he had a couple of thousand of his own,so that's nobody's business.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #144 on: July 01, 2017, 04:28:PM »
Bamber sold everything he could from Sheila's flat. While Colin Caffell was not around. He told CC he needed the money.

Adam

I know he sold stuff from Sheila's flat does that mean he murdered his family.  No.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #145 on: July 01, 2017, 04:29:PM »
Adam

I know he sold stuff from Sheila's flat does that mean he murdered his family.  No.

What about the forensic & circumstantial evidence ?

Or do you prefer to focus on Julie identifying the twins.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2017, 04:30:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #146 on: July 01, 2017, 04:30:PM »
No you didn't

"No you didn't"? Are we to understand, from that, that you're saying Caroline is a liar?

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #147 on: July 01, 2017, 04:33:PM »
It's pretty obvious the one piece of evidence Roch says he has but won't divulge, is to do with forgery & framing.  Both within & outside of EP.

There is no way one piece of evidence from Roch can negate the 200+ pieces of incriminating evidence that has already been published & submitted at trial & at appeals. Unless it shows deliberate forgery.

Adam what you have posted is incorrect Roch has never said he had evidence he stated he had seen it and was not allowed to share with us as the evidence was not his to share.  You cannot make sweeping statements like this you nor I have a clue what evidence Roch has seen it could blow all of yours out the water and you may have to start again making new threads

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #148 on: July 01, 2017, 04:34:PM »



Yes-----he needed the money to pay for the £hundreds in death duties and funerals.

Neither of which was required imminently. He could have paid for the funerals from his own money had it been necessary for him to do so. Death duties would have been paid from monies left by his parents. There was absolutely NO need for him to scrape funds together for either.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44415
Re: Witheld Docs
« Reply #149 on: July 01, 2017, 04:36:PM »
Adam what you have posted is incorrect Roch has never said he had evidence he stated he had seen it and was not allowed to share with us as the evidence was not his to share.  You cannot make sweeping statements like this you nor I have a clue what evidence Roch has seen it could blow all of yours out the water and you may have to start again making new threads

One piece of evidence can't blow 200+ pieces out of the water.

He would have to have seen something that showed there was large scale forgery & fabrication taking place to create all the evidence that convicted Bamber.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.