Witheld Docs

[susan]

What about the forensic & circumstantial evidence ?

Or do you prefer to focus on Julie identifying the twins.

Adam
let me make this clear Julie identifying the twins is not one of my reasons for thinking Sheila murdered her family what difference does it make who identified the twins it seems to mean so much to you and you alone

[susan]

One piece of evidence can't blow 200+ pieces out of the water.

He would have to have seen something that showed there was large scale forgery & fabrication taking place to create all the evidence that convicted Bamber.

Adam you will have to wait and see then make up your mind you may change to thinking Jeremy is guilty

[Adam]

Adam
let me make this clear Julie identifying the twins is not one of my reasons for thinking Sheila murdered her family what difference does it make who identified the twins it seems to mean so much to you and you alone

You have previously said Bamber is innocent because Julie identified the twins. As you believe you would have acted differently at her age & in her situation.

Do you think the forensic & circumstantial evidence shows Bamber is innocent ?

[Adam]

Adam you will have to wait and see then make up your mind you may change to thinking Jeremy is guilty

Maybe there will be a 4x whammy. With Roch, David, JackieD & Mike releasing their withheld evidence at the same time.

[lookout]

Neither of which was required imminently. He could have paid for the funerals from his own money had it been necessary for him to do so. Death duties would have been paid from monies left by his parents. There was absolutely NO need for him to scrape funds together for either.

Whatever he sold was his own to sell at the time.

I understand that JM gave him a helping hand bring home the tonnes of cannabis from Amsterdam ?
She obviously showed no objection to going on a drug trip then ?

[David1819]

One piece of evidence can't blow 200+ pieces out of the water.

It was 100 last week now it's back to 200?

One piece of evidence can blow 200+ pieces of bullshit someone pulls out their backside any day.

[Jane]

Whatever he sold was his own to sell at the time.

I understand that JM gave him a helping hand bring home the tonnes of cannabis from Amsterdam ?
She obviously showed no objection to going on a drug trip then ?

Well, actually, it wasn't. Not until it had gone through probate. It might have been permissible had he handed the monies accrued to the accountant, but I don't recall that as having happened. I have NO idea why you keep dragging Julie into this -after all, wasn't Brett there, too- she wasn't suspected of murder and she wasn't a family member. If she showed no objection to going on what you refer to as a drug trip, so what? However, whilst she may have gone there with him, she's never said how she felt about it. It may simply have been that whilst she was out of England she wouldn't have to answer questions. I don't know the answer to that. Unlike you, I'm not jumping to conclusions.

[Adam]

It was 100 last week now it's back to 200?

One piece of evidence can blow 200+ pieces of bullshit someone pulls out their backside any day.

You keep saying the same thing. And I keep giving the same answer.

It's 50+ pieces of forensic evidence. Perhaps up to a hundred. I've recently posted a long list of  published forensic evidence which was submitted to trial & appeals.

Then you have a mountain of circumstantial evidence. Which is just as important.

Anyway, Roch's one piece of evidence he says he has seen, won't negate the incriminating evidence. Unless it proves deliberate wide scale forgery, perjury & a framing attempt.

[susan]

Maybe there will be a 4x whammy. With Roch, David, JackieD & Mike releasing their withheld evidence at the same time.

Adam I did not know Jackie and Mike had any new evidence as well wow that is excellent.

[Adam]

Adam I did not know Jackie and Mike had any new evidence as well wow that is excellent.

Mike said several years ago he has a picture of Sheila on the bed. David said he had made a 'forensic evidence breakthrough' over a year ago but Andrew Hunter told him to not say what it was. JackieD said she has new information but won't say what it is 

All the published evidence shows guilt.

[Steve_uk]

Mike said several years ago he has a picture of Sheila on the bed. David said he had made a 'forensic evidence breakthrough' over a year ago but Andrew Hunter told him to not say what it was. JackieD said she has new information but won't say what it is 

All the published evidence shows guilt.

This site does suffer when members hold their cards too close to their chest.

[JackieD]

"No you didn't"? Are we to understand, from that, that you're saying Caroline is a liar?

I asked Caroline that question weeks ago and she posted she hadn't asked him

[Jane]

I asked Caroline that question weeks ago and she posted she hadn't asked him

I think I'll wait to hear that from Caroline before drawing conclusions.

[Caroline]

No you didn't

Yes I did - find my post where I said I hadn't asked him?

[Caroline]

I think I'll wait to hear that from Caroline before drawing conclusions.

She'll be able to find the post where I said I didn't ask him then.