Who funded Julie Mugford between September 1985 and October 1986?

[Roch]

We seem to have a young woman who was allowed to live free of charge in police accommodation for just over a year. But where did she get her daily living expenses from?

[nugnug]

she could of been signinighn on i suppose.

[Stephanie]

We seem to have a young woman who was allowed to live free of charge in police accommodation for just over a year. But where did she get her daily living expenses from?

No idea how this thread will support Bambers claims of innocence?

But in answer to your question, she turned Queens evidence so more than likely the state.

[Roch]

she could of been signinighn on i suppose.

I was just wondering the same.  Pretty measly existence though. 

[Jane]

We seem to have a young woman who was allowed to live free of charge in police accommodation for just over a year. But where did she get her daily living expenses from?

She wasn't charged with anything so presumably she's still have been paid a salary. Even had she been suspended, I believe she'd still have been entitled to half pay.

[Roch]

No idea how this thread will support Bambers claims of innocence?

But in answer to your question, she turned Queens evidence so more than likely the state.

How does that work though?  Which element of the state?  Would there not have to be an audit trail somewhere?

[Stephanie]

I was just wondering the same.  Pretty measly existence though.

Definitely compared to the high life bamber was afforded from sponging off others.

[Stephanie]

How does that work though?  Which element of the state?  Would there not have to be an audit trail somewhere?

Still not sure how an audit trail will clear Bamber?

[Stephanie]

It's her evidence given during the trial you need to focus on. Attempting to assassinate her character further won't clear his name.

[Roch]

Definitely compared to the high life bamber was afforded from sponging off others.

He worked full time - and his scheming, avaricious relatives soon put paid to any 'high-life'.

Still not sure how an audit trail will clear Bamber?

I haven't stated that it would.  That doesn't mean is is not an interesting or valid query.

[nugnug]

I was just wondering the same.  Pretty measly existence though.

dole money was a bit more genrous then that it is now but still wouldent of been a pleasent exitence for a whle year.

but then the thought of 25k when it was all over might of been enough to keep her going.

[Stephanie]

He worked full time - and his scheming, avaricious relatives soon put paid to any 'high-life'.

I haven't stated that it would.  That doesn't mean is is not an interesting or valid query.

You were referring to Julie in the year leading up to the trial. Where was bamber working full time at that time?

[Roch]

It's her evidence given during the trial you need to focus on. Attempting to assassinate her character further won't clear his nameatur.

I think you summed it up with your use of the term 'further'.  Her character has already been damaged. However, she was arguably a victim in all this - not given an opportunity to hang around after trial but sent packing over the pond - out of the picture.  It's a pity Stan told her that the phone call from Nevill to Jeremy never existed (when it fact - it could not be proven either way).  He had no right to do that.

[Roch]

dole money was a bit more genrous then that it is now but still wouldent of been a pleasent exitence for a whle year.

but then the thought of 25k when it was all over might of been enough to keep her going.

You stole the thoughts right out of my mind nugsy.

[Roch]

You were referring to Julie in the year leading up to the trial. Where was bamber working full time at that time?

He wasn't - he was incarcerated in various prisons awaiting trial.