I was amused to read, on another forum, where a move seems to be afoot to spring Jeremy from his confinement, how the jury had, allegedly been mislead by RWB who said, on oath, that he wouldn't benefit financially from Jeremy's conviction and revealed that Jeremy had told him "I could easily kill my parents"!!!! We appear to be asked to put aside the fact that Jeremy uttered those words to focus on the fact that RWB -NOT my favourite character but I can't hold that against him- didn't tell the truth when he said he wouldn't benefit. Well, YES, he did! He gave a truthful answer to the question he was asked and SURELY the main thrust WASN'T about whether or not he'd benefit, but what Jeremy said. THIS has been blurred.
There have been other incidents since I've been on this forum -many of them scurrilous and totally untrue slurs on Sheila- to divert attention from the known facts. Shove in some frills, get people to concentrate on those and the facts get forgotten.overlooked/hidden. The fact remains that 31 years ago a jury convicted Jeremy and despite numerous attempts to con money from his family/obtain his release, it's clearly not considered that he's safe to be allowed back into the public -his trial judge said, at the time, it remained to be seen- and attempts by those here to draw every agency, in the Kingdom, into a mass conspiracy is just another attempt at blurring the truth.
The biggest irony here is Jane has done exactly what she has accused others of doing. Being a "wordsmith" and Blurring the truth.
In order to let people know one is not making stuff up, everyone should cite explicit textual evidence to support their opinions or statements.
I can cite several pieces of documented evidence to support my claim over on IA. The evidence speaks for itself.
