Sandra Leans book "No Smoke" should be re-vised or withdrawn

[guest7363]

speak for yourself im sure a lot of other people especaily people who made financail contributions.

Well you seem to be speaking for yourself?  I can't see a lot of other people joining you.

[Jane]

and im proud to be somones got to be.

THAT depends on your agenda. I experience you as jumping on every available 'cause' in an attempt to disrupt it. I see nothing altruistic in that, whatsoever.

[Jane]

Well you seem to be speaking for yourself?  I can't see a lot of other people joining you.

Absolutely, Justice. Which rather suggests that he doesn't have the support he'd have us believe.

[nugnug]

THAT depends on your agenda. I experience you as jumping on every available 'cause' in an attempt to disrupt it. I see nothing altruistic in that, whatsoever.

what couse an i disrupting exactly.

[buddy]

Well you seem to be speaking for yourself?  I can't see a lot of other people joining you.

Hi Justice I think the reason no one is joining in is because it has got far too personal, and I for one am steering clear.
A lot of people have been duped, misled on here, and is wrong to attack these people.

[Jane]

what couse an i disrupting exactly.

I believe the cause/reason to be secondary tom the disruption. IF I allowed you the benefit of doubt, I could venture that you're simply out of kilter with the majority, but I have the distinct impression that it gives you a certain pleasure/makes you feel powerful? to practice disruption for disruption's sake.

[Stephanie]

As for my questions about the confession, I don't see anything "sick" about asking questions rather than accepting something at face value.

I have asked you numerous questions on the board, most of which you have ignored.

I see you got your own way and had the thread taken down re: the WAP Org Charity you set up with Billy Middleton, but you've yet to clarify your position. I ask again, when did your partnership at the WAP org end, or are you a sleeping partner? 

[Stephanie]

I believe the cause/reason to be secondary tom the disruption. IF I allowed you the benefit of doubt, I could venture that you're simply out of kilter with the majority, but I have the distinct impression that it gives you a certain pleasure/makes you feel powerful? to practice disruption for disruption's sake.

I am glad I am not alone in my beliefs. No one would listen to me when I, and others, pointed this out years ago.

Does anyone know what happened to the WAP thread? It appears to have disappeared? Could it not have been edited, as opposed to complete removal. Sandra Leans name could have been taken out of the thread title for example?

[sandra L]

No, it doesn't work that way! I answered your question on the other thread, and you had plenty of opportunity to take my name out of it - I specifically asked you to do so, and you refused. So it's gone now - as soon as I figure out how to do so, I'll send proof of what I say to the mods.

Can anyone help me out with that? Are the mods the people whose names appear in red, and if so, how do I attach documents to private messages to them?

[Stephanie]

No, it doesn't work that way! I answered your question on the other thread, and you had plenty of opportunity to take my name out of it - I specifically asked you to do so, and you refused. So it's gone now - as soon as I figure out how to do so, I'll send proof of what I say to the mods.

Who made you MOD?

I know exactly what you are up to Sandra with your behind the scenes games. No one needs evidence of anything, unless you are referring to you no longer being a partner of WAP and possible civil action taking place because of the activities of Billy Middleton finally catching up with him.

[JackiePreece]

No, it doesn't work that way! I answered your question on the other thread, and you had plenty of opportunity to take my name out of it - I specifically asked you to do so, and you refused. So it's gone now - as soon as I figure out how to do so, I'll send proof of what I say to the mods.

Can anyone help me out with that? Are the mods the people whose names appear in red, and if so, how do I attach documents to private messages to them?

I will find out for you Sandra or you could message NGB

[nugnug]

I believe the cause/reason to be secondary tom the disruption. IF I allowed you the benefit of doubt, I could venture that you're simply out of kilter with the majority, but I have the distinct impression that it gives you a certain pleasure/makes you feel powerful? to practice disruption for disruption's sake.

well when you've worked out whats being disrupted get back to me and ill see what I can do.

[Jane]

and im proud to be somones got to be.

 You're playing semantics. If you're so proud to do it, you don't need me to tell you.

[nugnug]

well it appears I do.

[sandra L]

I will find out for you Sandra or you could message NGB

Thank you - I've asked questions elsewhere. so all good!