So, according to Julie Mugford, Jeremy had been planning to kill his entire family for a year, by drugging them, burning them whilst they were deeply under the influence of Julie's drugs, yet not once until September does she introduce mention of a hitman who had carried out the murders on Jeremy's say so, 'Mathew' was the hitmans name, 'Mathew McDonald'. So, where in the previous year, had Mathew come into the equation? We never did get an answer from Julie concerning this. If the truth be known, the hitman theory stemmed from police knowlege that Jeremy himself had not killed his sister.
In September 1985, it became a case of the cops 'fessing up' to the role they played in Sheila's death, and admitting to lying to the Deputy Coroner at the opening of the inquests, or try to pin the blame onto somebody else.
Jeremy was not really high on their radar at the time of his first arrest, hence why cops were interested in hearing from Julie of any possible accomplice, or hitman. Not surprisingly, Julie did not introduce names of any of the drug dealers, and drug offenders who lived in rooms as the same apartment as herself. 'Mathew, could have done it', she volunteered, 'Mathew McDonald', she said, 'he has a reputation locally as being a mercenary', said she, 'he could have done it', adding, 'he knows Jeremy'...