Did the police fabricate evidence or didn't they? That question can only be answered by Jeremy Bamber. It is he who has the answers to the many unanswered questions. But will he ever answer them? Answering them will undoubtedly show his guilt.
Does anyone know if he is due to write another blog this side of Christmas? I'm looking forward to him blogging about his case, in detail, as opposed to the see through sympathy seeking blogs he tends to favour. Someone really needs to tell him they aren't working anymore and that he's losing support.
If anyone does write or speak to him. Can they ask him to also blog about his moral compass and compare his to that of Sheila's. He's avoided it for 32 years. Wonder why? 
We need to know about the real Jeremy Bamber. What makes him tick. No more pity plays please!
We don't need to know any more about what Jeremy Bamber is really like as a person because it has no bearing upon the now known facts regarding who really killed his sister. The jury which tried and convicted him, did so based on a trail of lies and deceit as presented by Essex police, it's experts, and some prosecution witnesses. Sheila did not die in the bedroom until 'after' 8.10am. we now know this to be true because at 7.37am she was present in the kitchen as confirmed by the deliberately withheld police message log contents. Sheila in the kitchen then prior to 8.10am, and only three bodies present upstairs by that stage - now imagine the jury having to take that on board? It doesn't matter 'a jot' where Sheila's body ended up after the period between 7.37 and 8.10am, fact is she wasn't laid on the main bedroom floor with the rifle from the first floor window (7.15am onward) on her body throughout this 33 minute period. He may be many things to different people, a monster, a charmer, a child killer, a nonce, a user, an abuser, but nothing can alter hard facts written in stone. Sheila, that's his sister, was not laid out on the bedroom floor at any stage between 7.37am, and 8.10am, that morning with the family rifle in her possession. I am not saying her body didn't end up there later on, with the rifle from the first floor window in her possession but that's another story. If the jury had got a whiff of these now known facts, recorded in official police records, it would have proved pivotal in their verdict. 'Doubt', that is all a defendants case has to show and prove. In this case, it can be said with 100% certainty that Bambers sister's body wasn't laid out on the main bedroom floor with the family rifle clutched against her body at any stage between 7.37am and 8.10am, on that first morning. Anything after that can't have involved Bamber at all. Essex police are to blame for this miscarriage of justice, by lying about the true circumstances of Sheila's death in the main bedroom. This is not Bamber trying to get away with it, or anything. He simply could not have had anything whatsoever to do with Sheila's body laid out in the main bedroom in possession of any rifle, any silencer, or any ammunition of this type, or that type. Which part don't you understand?
This explanation I am giving, is similar to my own case from yesteryear, where two Barnsley CID officers claimed to have been present in an observation van outside some target premises at 5.20pm, on the 22nd January, 1986. I was kept in custody for five and a half months on remand because cops withheld a surveillance log, which showed that a Detective Inspector in the No.3 Regional Crime Squad had not passed a message for officers to go and collect the observation van in question from the compound at Barnsley police station. This request was recorded in a timed message at 5.55pm, that date. The observation van was not put into position in the road outside the target premises until 6.30pm, that date. So, obviously the two South Yorkshire cops couldn't have been inside that observation van at 5.20pm, outside the target premises on that date, and they could not have seen a stolen motor vehicle pull up outside the target premises being driven, they both said, by none other than myself...
Cops withheld the log of messages, which could have prevented the loss of my liberty for a period of about five and a half months. I know there is a vast difference in the length of time that Bamber has been in custody (over 30 years) compared to my predicament, but nevertheless, the overlaying principles are the same. There existed and there exists police message log contents which place Sheila in the kitchen with Ralph Bamber at 7.37am, onward. She was not upstairs in the bedroom by 8.10am, since by that stage there were only three bodies upstairs, not four...
Surely, if there is any justice, this man Bamber should be released from custody immediately. He cannot have shot and killed his sister in that main bedroom using the family owned rifle. It's impossible based upon the material contained in these previously withheld message logs. Bamber was never inside the farmhouse at all after 8.10am. This is like in my case, aforementioned, when I now say, that the two Barnsley CID men couldn't have been inside the observation van at 5.20pm on the 22nd January, 1986. They couldn't have been in that observation van at 5.20pm, that date, because the observation van was not there until much later on. Similarly, and without doubt or question, Sheila's body did not arrive inside the main bedroom until after 8.10am. The rifle which was later photographed at a first floor window, then upon his sisters body, did not leave it's resting place against a first floor window until after 7.15am. Therefore, this rules Bamber out of being the person who murdered his sister, and who allegedly staged her death scene, there on the main bedroom floor - But, how could he have? You tell me exactly how Bamber could possibly have shot and killed his sister with use of the family rifle after 8.10am, that morning?
He couldn't possibly have shot and killed his sister, in the same way Cops couldn't have seen me driving a stolen vehicle from inside an observation van that wasn't there, when they said it was...
Bamber, for all his faults did not shoot, or kill his sister, that's a fact, it's the truth. It's factual, it's logical, and it's the absolute truth...
