Author Topic: The window catch issue  (Read 42171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #435 on: December 06, 2016, 10:44:PM »
10.00am 22of August, D/Constable Barlow went to WHF and made a note in his pocket book, the window over the kitchen sink could be closed from the outside with the handle in the up position and this would fall down in the locking position when banged?

Oh dear
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #436 on: December 06, 2016, 10:48:PM »
This is taken from the 2002 Appeal Judgement. It seems to show that the CT are indeed wasting their time.

286. The prosecution had established conclusively and without challenge the appellant's ability to enter and leave the White House Farm when it was apparently secure from his own answers. Julie Mugford confirmed the fact. The Crown did not have the burden of proving by which window and by which mechanism the entry was made. The Crown proved capacity both to enter and leave. There was no issue. As the trial Judge said (at page 10E):

"… how he got there and out again whether by the kitchen window or any other means, though of interest, cannot affect the outcome of the case"
“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline Stephanie

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7614
  • The facts leading to the Simon Hall confession
Re: Bambers letter dated 10th October 2016
« Reply #437 on: December 07, 2016, 12:09:AM »
What a chancer he is...

I guarantee you one of his supporters has sent him something discussed on this forum and he's running with it - like he has done with everything else.

SH did exactly the same!

I wonder how many letters he's written like this over the years regarding other alleged issues? I've got letters very similar.

“The only people who are mad at you for telling the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep telling the truth"

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #438 on: December 09, 2016, 11:14:AM »
Police records confirm that Sheila was present in the kitchen (7.37and 7.38am), and that her body was not upstairs in any bedroom by 8.10am. Additionally the rifle which was later photographed in Sheila's possession by 'DC 'Oakey (25) and PC Bird (26, onward) was confirmed resting against a first floor window by 7.15am...

No lies, no bullshit, but good old fashioned police records, containing information which the cops and the CPS daren't risk informing the jury which tried the matter about...

Why?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44294
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #439 on: December 24, 2016, 10:21:AM »
https://youtu.be/65t__yHjAjk

Here is a new video on the window.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #440 on: September 17, 2017, 03:23:PM »
https://youtu.be/65t__yHjAjk

Here is a new video on the window.

Kaldin - have you seen this video before?  It's one of the more professionally made ones. 

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21084
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #441 on: September 17, 2017, 03:36:PM »
https://youtu.be/65t__yHjAjk

Here is a new video on the window.
At 5:42 they've cut off one sentence: " One window in particular in the kitchen could be closed from the outside by banging the window."

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #442 on: September 17, 2017, 03:41:PM »
At 5:42 they've cut off one sentence: " One window in particular in the kitchen could be closed from the outside by banging the window."

I think the issue relates to 'closed but not locked'.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #443 on: September 17, 2017, 04:07:PM »
Kaldin - have you seen this video before?  It's one of the more professionally made ones.

Hi Roch. I haven't seen it before, so thanks for posting it. The window isn't something I've paid a lot of attention to, so I'll have to look into it more. I did think that he allegedly gained entrance to the house via a different window and exited via the kitchen window.

The first thing I thought whilst watching the video is whether or not anyone checked for footprints outside the window, or fingerprints on the window before these experiments were started. If they didn't, that was a terrible mistake.

I'd like to know how Jeremy got in or out of a window without disturbing anything on the window sill,  how Anne Eaton and Julie Mugford knew about the issues with the window, and also how the police knew that the doors were bolted before they got into the house.

Online Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #444 on: September 17, 2017, 04:10:PM »
Hi Roch. I haven't seen it before, so thanks for posting it. The window isn't something I've paid a lot of attention to, so I'll have to look into it more. I did think that he allegedly gained entrance to the house via a different window and exited via the kitchen window.

The first thing I thought whilst watching the video is whether or not anyone checked for footprints outside the window, or fingerprints on the window before these experiments were started. If they didn't, that was a terrible mistake.

I'd like to know how Jeremy got in or out of a window without disturbing anything on the window sill,  how Anne Eaton and Julie Mugford knew about the issues with the window, and also how the police knew that the doors were bolted before they got into the house.

Yeah I thought you might be interested in it.  There's been a good few videos produced since you were last on the forum.  Varying quality in production.  Some good ones though.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21084
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #445 on: September 17, 2017, 04:25:PM »
Hi Roch. I haven't seen it before, so thanks for posting it. The window isn't something I've paid a lot of attention to, so I'll have to look into it more. I did think that he allegedly gained entrance to the house via a different window and exited via the kitchen window.

The first thing I thought whilst watching the video is whether or not anyone checked for footprints outside the window, or fingerprints on the window before these experiments were started. If they didn't, that was a terrible mistake.

I'd like to know how Jeremy got in or out of a window without disturbing anything on the window sill,  how Anne Eaton and Julie Mugford knew about the issues with the window, and also how the police knew that the doors were bolted before they got into the house.
Things were out of place on the window sill, as noted by housekeeper Jean Boutell, but as usual the Police will be blamed so this is yet one more indicator to be disregarded.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #446 on: September 17, 2017, 04:33:PM »
In that video there's a statement from DC Barlow that when he experimented with the window, he couldn't get the latch to close because it was stiff. However, in his notes he didn't say that. He said "One window in particular in the kitchen could be closed from the outside (by banging on window). I don't know when he took those notes.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3185.0.html

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #447 on: September 17, 2017, 05:03:PM »
The windows had been painted before the murders.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2017, 05:14:PM by lookout »

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #448 on: September 17, 2017, 05:16:PM »
Things were out of place on the window sill, as noted by housekeeper Jean Boutell, but as usual the Police will be blamed so this is yet one more indicator to be disregarded.

She said that the yellow sink tidy was upright and that it was usually placed flat. I can't see why Jeremy or anyone would place it in an upright position in order to get out of the window because it was still in the way. She also said that the washing up liquid was somewhere it shouldn't have been - in front of the window. It was supposed to be in the left hand corner of the windowsill. Again, I can't see why Jeremy or anyone would move it in front of the window.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: The window catch issue
« Reply #449 on: September 17, 2017, 06:02:PM »
She said that the yellow sink tidy was upright and that it was usually placed flat. I can't see why Jeremy or anyone would place it in an upright position in order to get out of the window because it was still in the way. She also said that the washing up liquid was somewhere it shouldn't have been - in front of the window. It was supposed to be in the left hand corner of the windowsill. Again, I can't see why Jeremy or anyone would move it in front of the window.
I must say it does apper to be clutching at straws as anyone could have moved the flipping thing and it proves absolutely nothing imo.