Exactly, Lady C, where is this hard evidence of JB's guilt? The police could find nothing to link him to the murder scene: no forensics, no blood, no injuries on JB, no mud on the bicycle.
What was the motive for Bamber to brutally slaughter all of the members of his entire immediate family? Doesn't the alleged greed motive break down in the light of the share of his frail and elderly grandmother's substantial estate that Bamber would have inherited within months had he not been charged with these murders?
The most damning allegations against Bamber were only made by his girlfriend after he'd cuckolded her: this key witness, given immunity from prosecution for her crimes, sold her story to the News Of The World for an astonishingly high sum, sufficient to purchase a flat (and a good time overseas?). She had, on her own admission, attempted to smother Jeremy to prevent him leaving her and seeing someone else.
Most of the remaining allegations were made by an extended family who stood to lose substantial shares in their homes, farms and business if Jeremy was found to be innocent.
All the while, vital evidence which supported Bamber's innocence never saw the light of day in the courtroom because it was suppressed. Jeremy Bamber's conviction was secured beneath the veil of secrecy of a PII gagging order. The substantial amount of evidence witheld from the defence and court, thanks to the misapplication of this shadowy instrument of suppression, meant that the truth of what really happened at White House Farm on 7th August 1985 could never be determined. Bamber was convicted of five murders and condemned to die in prison without Bamber, his defence or the jury ever knowing what the case against him really was or what evidence existed in support of his innocence or guilt.
This to me is the most damning evidence of this entire case: that which was suppressed. This suppression of evidence under the auspices of PII has thrown a veil of secrecy around this case which predjudiced and precluded a just outcome. It precluded Bamber and his defence team properly understanding the case against JB. It prevented Bamber properly defending himself. It thereby denied Jeremy Bamber a fair trial
Wrong Keira, why do you continue to invent facts which fit with your fantasy?
The bicycle wheels were caked in mud along the tyre walls evidencing that they had been through fields.
The motive was pure greed for money Keira, money and power! Didn't his frail grandmother disinherit him Keira...I wonder why?
It was Julie Mugford who left him actually after she overheard him speaking on the phone with an old flame. Didn't he force her arm up her back in a fit of rage...nice chap!
No matter what you try to say about the other
facts about him they are corroborated in many instances by outsiders. I am afraid your portrayal of Jeremy as the loving honourable son leaves much to be desired Keira...the truth is patently different I am afraid!
Your assumption that the documents or photos can and will in some way give effect to Jeremy's exoneration is pure fantasy. Just because information is withheld in the public interest doesn't in any stretch of the imagination mean that they could support Jeremy in some way. Balderdash!
We know what happened at White House farm that night and no amount of silly theories will ever change that!
