Author Topic: When the enquiry changed from a suicide to murder did the relatives have alibis?  (Read 32599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

clifford

  • Guest
Chocokeira...........so very well put. Am thinking that you should have been his barrister   ;)
The sad fact is,that I dont believe that JB will ever be set free all the while the relatives still inhabit this earth.I dont believe that it is because JB is a danger to the public,more that the relatives  and JM (rightly or wrongly)are doing a good job convincing the powers that be,that JB would be a danger to them if released.What bothers me is that if JB (according to JM),hired a hit-man to wipe out his immediate family for financial gain,then why not take the same route and have the relatives "done away with" too.He has had the money and surely the contacts whilst in prison.And what a perfect alibi he would have! Could you imagine? Most of his problems would be solved.The truth is,at the end of the day,JB is no cunning  gangster.He was just very unfortunate and unluckly to be adopted into a emotionally devoid and money driven family.
I do not think that RN was money driven. He was a very shrewd man who wanted children. Not for his sake, but the sake of his wife who must have been devistated that she could not bear children. It is no coincidence they adopted a girl and a boy. They both must have thought thier family was complete.
I can imagine the scorn that the rest of the family had to these children [cuckoos].
The family could see at this early stage that the children would inherit the Bamber fortune. The seed had been set.
When the family was wiped out the remaining cuckoo stood to gain everything. The family then decided that this could not happen, or they would lose what they had left.[ which was,nt much] Nevill had already bailed them out, and now the cuckoo was in charge. It is not a secret that they were not close, so JB was not going to do them any favours.
They needed to put JB in the frame, but how.
Harrass the cops, and find a silencer.Need some blood now. Aah, the knickers.
What person would wash out some knickers for a dead person, you would bin them, unless you needed a bit of blood, Oh yes she binned them after washing them, along with the twins clothes.
Seems to me that the family were wasted as farmers, the sweeny would have signed them up like a shot, they were as good as Sherlock Holmse. Talk about missing thier vocation, they could of found Jack the Ripper, but would probably needed to plant something.
Take a look on Youtube of their latest on JB. Bewes is all at sea. Senior Officers from other forces are bewildered ,Sutherst is convinced the photographic evidence is flawed. Bewes was not aware the body had been moved. Says it all really.
Smite all you like, I could,nt give a toss.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.
must be better than a printer.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D
I must of pissed them all off.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D
I must of pissed them all off.

Nah... it made me laugh anyway.

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D
I must of pissed them all off.
I really meant what I said though.

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D
I must of pissed them all off.

Nah... it made me laugh anyway.
Oh bollocks Rochy I was trying to be serious. Thanks anyway.

clifford

  • Guest
Cliff, the knickers bit bothers me a lot. There was no logical reason for Ann Eaton to bring them from WHF to her home. There just isn´t.
Needed some blood. Part of the grand plan.
Without trying to be crude, I am led to believe that menstrual blood is thicker than normal blood. I don,t know though, I am not a gynacologist, would,nt mind the job though.


It's all gone a bit quiet Cliff...  ;D
I must of pissed them all off.

Nah... it made me laugh anyway.
Oh bollocks Rochy I was trying to be serious. Thanks anyway.
[/quote
I will take my smites on the chin from the wankers who have not got the b******* to face me.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
What is up with all the sunglasses ads??  ::)

John

  • Guest


John...........you are quite right.Arrogance and greed does not make someone a murderer! So why is JB incacerated? Because he was well and truly stitched up,that is why! Why would someone murder their entire family for an inheritance that was going to be theirs anyway? I will believe totally in JBs guilt when I am shown some hard evidence.Because testimonys from people who stood to gain financially from JBs conviction and a "magically appearing"  bloodied sound moderator,just dont do it for me!

I don't understand how you can possibly come to the conclusion he was stitched up your ladyship.  If anything occurred he stitched himself up with his big mouth.

He wasn't going to get the inheritance so that is your first wrongful assumption.  June had made it quite clear that her estate was going to go to Nicholas and Daniel and I have my suspicions that Nevill was on the verge of doing the same thing.  Jeremy was as they say, about to get his marching orders!


Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?


John...........you are quite right.Arrogance and greed does not make someone a murderer! So why is JB incacerated? Because he was well and truly stitched up,that is why! Why would someone murder their entire family for an inheritance that was going to be theirs anyway? I will believe totally in JBs guilt when I am shown some hard evidence.Because testimonys from people who stood to gain financially from JBs conviction and a "magically appearing"  bloodied sound moderator,just dont do it for me!

I don't understand how you can possibly come to the conclusion he was stitched up your ladyship.  If anything occurred he stitched himself up with his big mouth.

He wasn't going to get the inheritance so that is your first wrongful assumption.  June had made it quite clear that her estate was going to go to Nicholas and Daniel and I have my suspicions that Nevill was on the verge of doing the same thing.  Jeremy was as they say, about to get his marching orders!

What did Jeremy do that was so terrible that they were about to disinherit him? Is this true at all? Where is that information from?
In any case I think it is a terrible way to treat your child. I don´t think the Bambers can have been particularly good parents. Both their children had drug problems. June called her daughter "the Devil´s child" - that lingered with poor Sheila and she projected this to her own sons. It is an awful thing to say to your child - especially an adopted child!

chochokeira

  • Guest


John...........you are quite right.Arrogance and greed does not make someone a murderer! So why is JB incacerated? Because he was well and truly stitched up,that is why! Why would someone murder their entire family for an inheritance that was going to be theirs anyway? I will believe totally in JBs guilt when I am shown some hard evidence.Because testimonys from people who stood to gain financially from JBs conviction and a "magically appearing"  bloodied sound moderator,just dont do it for me!

I don't understand how you can possibly come to the conclusion he was stitched up your ladyship.  If anything occurred he stitched himself up with his big mouth.

He wasn't going to get the inheritance so that is your first wrongful assumption.  June had made it quite clear that her estate was going to go to Nicholas and Daniel and I have my suspicions that Nevill was on the verge of doing the same thing.  Jeremy was as they say, about to get his marching orders!


John, the last time you made this entirely unsustantiated claim I asked you for proof. You couldn't provide proof because you clearly don't have any.

Now I'm asking you again: put up, or shut up!

chochokeira

  • Guest


John...........you are quite right.Arrogance and greed does not make someone a murderer! So why is JB incacerated? Because he was well and truly stitched up,that is why! Why would someone murder their entire family for an inheritance that was going to be theirs anyway? I will believe totally in JBs guilt when I am shown some hard evidence.Because testimonys from people who stood to gain financially from JBs conviction and a "magically appearing"  bloodied sound moderator,just dont do it for me!

I don't understand how you can possibly come to the conclusion he was stitched up your ladyship.  If anything occurred he stitched himself up with his big mouth.

He wasn't going to get the inheritance so that is your first wrongful assumption.  June had made it quite clear that her estate was going to go to Nicholas and Daniel and I have my suspicions that Nevill was on the verge of doing the same thing.  Jeremy was as they say, about to get his marching orders!

What did Jeremy do that was so terrible that they were about to disinherit him? Is this true at all? Where is that information from?
In any case I think it is a terrible way to treat your child. I don´t think the Bambers can have been particularly good parents. Both their children had drug problems. June called her daughter "the Devil´s child" - that lingered with poor Sheila and she projected this to her own sons. It is an awful thing to say to your child - especially an adopted child!

 The only place this disinheritance threat ever existed, abs, is as a figment of John's imagination. I asked him for proof some time ago but he was unable to provide any.