Author Topic: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:  (Read 10211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Whose were the fingermarks on Sheila's neck and also June's ? Were they bloodied or indented ( as in pressure ) ?

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Whose were the fingermarks on Sheila's neck and also June's ? Were they bloodied or indented ( as in pressure ) ?
do you know if theres a photo of them'finger marks.'junes one's could have been made by june herself

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
do you know if theres a photo of them'finger marks.'junes one's could have been made by june herself





There WILL be photographs showing all injuries,including the finger marks---------held under PII. If you read the pathologist's first report,this is stated.
I hardly think that June would have gripped her own neck so much so as to leave fingermarks. They were impressed.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076




There WILL be photographs showing all injuries,including the finger marks---------held under PII. If you read the pathologist's first report,this is stated.
I hardly think that June would have gripped her own neck so much so as to leave fingermarks. They were impressed.

Impressed? Where does it state that?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Impressed? Where does it state that?





If the marks/prints were impressed it means that they were visible as opposed to not. Impressions of someone's fingermarks. Just another term for being visible.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076




If the marks/prints were impressed it means that they were visible as opposed to not. Impressions of someone's fingermarks. Just another term for being visible.

They weren't indented marks, they were blood smears Lookout.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490




If the marks/prints were impressed it means that they were visible as opposed to not. Impressions of someone's fingermarks. Just another term for being visible.
so they could easily have been made by junes own hand :)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
so they could easily have been made by junes own hand :)




Why would you try and choke yourself ?
Not unless you press hard--------try it sometime and I bet you won't see any impression.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076



Why would you try and choke yourself ?
Not unless you press hard--------try it sometime and I bet you won't see any impression.

They were BLOOD marks and not impressions. Cover your hands in paint and touch your throat you'll soon see marks then.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490



Why would you try and choke yourself ?
Not unless you press hard--------try it sometime and I bet you won't see any impression.
maybe gasping for air or trying to find the wound to stop the bleeding by placing her hand on it

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #55 on: September 18, 2016, 09:32:AM »
Wilkes's book supports that Sheila's legs were pulled.

" John Hayward showed the jury Sheila Caffell's bloodied nightdress. He said it indicated she had been shot in a reclining position and not while lying down".

Why an earth would the police pull Sheila's legs over two feet before crime scene photos were taken ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #56 on: September 18, 2016, 10:46:AM »
If fingermarks had remained visible,it would have indicated that June had been already dead when they were applied,as indentations stay put after a person has died. Who but an out of control person would do that ?

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #57 on: September 18, 2016, 11:03:AM »
If fingermarks had remained visible,it would have indicated that June had been already dead when they were applied,as indentations stay put after a person has died. Who but an out of control person would do that ?

Not sure what this has to do with Sheila's legs being pulled.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #58 on: September 18, 2016, 11:29:AM »
Not sure what this has to do with Sheila's legs being pulled.




Oh dear-----same goes for your blood spots on the kitchen window thread.

This thread is old hat anyway !

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44291
Re: Why Bamber pulled Sheila's feet forward two feet after the fatal shot:
« Reply #59 on: September 18, 2016, 11:44:AM »
The thread is about Bamber pulling Sheila's legs.

A new source was found today from John Hayward. Which supports David, Buddy and the 2002 appeal assertion that Sheila was sitting up when shot. 

Me and the 2002 appeal believing Sheila's legs were pulled by Bamber. Buddy saying the police pulled Sheila's legs before photos were taken.

You have said it is my leg being pulled.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2016, 01:26:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.