teddybear

[lookout]

Lookout, the very last thing that an author of "facts" will want/NEED are lines which can be read between!!!!!!!!!  I'm just trying to imagine how far I'd have got in college had i told my tutors that they were supposed to "read between the lines".

For goodness sake. So this is now yet another hanging offence just because I happen to be FAR MORE imaginative than yourself  ? I obviously have a much broader out look on life than you also and DON'T do things by the book or what others do or think. Am I allowed to think for myself or do I have to abide by your rules now ?
My English Literature examination was to read a book then IN MY OWN WORDS re-write it !! Get it ??
I passed with flying colours ! A.S. level.  Funny,that !

[Jane]

For goodness sake. So this is now yet another hanging offence just because I happen to be FAR MORE imaginative than yourself  ? I obviously have a much broader out look on life than you also and DON'T do things by the book or what others do or think. Am I allowed to think for myself or do I have to abide by your rules now ?
My English Literature examination was to read a book then IN MY OWN WORDS re-write it !! Get it ??
I passed with flying colours ! A.S. level.  Funny,that !

Which is perfectly fine when it's a work of fiction which is to be rewritten and requires imagination. Unless specifically asked for, it most definitely would NOT be as fine if it had been an historical/FACTUAL work in which one's own imagination has no part.

[lookout]

Which is perfectly fine when it's a work of fiction which is to be rewritten and requires imagination. Unless specifically asked for, it most definitely would NOT be as fine if it had been an historical/FACTUAL work in which one's own imagination has no part.

What are ALL the Bamber books, but FICTION ? Because we DON'T know the true facts !!

[Jane]

What are ALL the Bamber books, but FICTION ? Because we DON'T know the true facts !!

You spend enough time presenting them as fact, Lookout. You certainly have quoted CP's drivel as such on numerous occasions, despite being reminded, that as she wasn't there, how could she possibly have known a particular "fact".

[lookout]

You spend enough time presenting them as fact, Lookout. You certainly have quoted CP's drivel as such on numerous occasions, despite being reminded, that as she wasn't there, how could she possibly have known a particular "fact".

None of them were there were they ? So one uses their imagination once they've got a briefing on the backgrounds of the families,in which everyone's versions are different-----------the same as on here,so why make such a big deal ? Not one book is the same as another.Why ? Because authors versions differ also depending on whether they see/find him guilty or not.
CAL also got carried away as well as CP did as both made prize bloomers in their books,but it's left to the reader as to whether they believe what's written and also depends which " side of the fence " you're on too.

[Jane]

None of them were there were they ? So one uses their imagination once they've got a briefing on the backgrounds of the families,in which everyone's versions are different-----------the same as on here,so why make such a big deal ? Not one book is the same as another.Why ? Because authors versions differ also depending on whether they see/find him guilty or not.
CAL also got carried away as well as CP did as both made prize bloomers in their books,but it's left to the reader as to whether they believe what's written and also depends which " side of the fence " you're on too.

I'm delighted you now seem to have taken on board, that from the time Colin left, there is no one who can verify what transpired en famille, Jeremy's input, according to how one sees it, is questionable. Other than that there are the two phone calls received on the night of the massacre.

I'm not making "a big deal". I'm simply asking you to provide a source for your statement that a specific thing "always drove Sheila mad with anger" to which your only reply was to say that you "read between the lines".

[Caroline]

By the sounds of things, pretty well during the time when Jeremy was still at home and whenever Sheila visited. Her and her mother seemed like a red rag to a bull every time they came into contact with each other.
Reference to this particular episode is on page 56 of CAL's book.

I do a lot of reading between lines as well as reading what the author writes,to get a fuller and more clearer picture----------I don't do " skimming " like a certain person did.

And the source for the "Why can't you be more like Jeremy" is none other than Jeremy himself  .

Reading between the lines is simply making assumptions, which is why you get things wrong.

[Caroline]

I'm delighted you now seem to have taken on board, that from the time Colin left, there is no one who can verify what transpired en famille, Jeremy's input, according to how one sees it, is questionable. Other than that there are the two phone calls received on the night of the massacre.

I'm not making "a big deal". I'm simply asking you to provide a source for your statement that a specific thing "always drove Sheila mad with anger" to which your only reply was to say that you "read between the lines".

The reason why Lookout won't say who the source for the comment was, is because it was Jeremy!

[lookout]

And the source for the "Why can't you be more like Jeremy" is none other than Jeremy himself  .

Reading between the lines is simply making assumptions, which is why you get things wrong.

So CAL used it in her book---------why ?  To fill a few more pages of drivel and hearsay ?

[Caroline]

So CAL used it in her book---------why ?  To fill a few more pages of drivel and hearsay ?

Unless you hadn't noticed, th book is about Bamber - of course she is going to use what he says. Why didn't you just say who made the quote?

[lookout]

The reason why Lookout won't say who the source for the comment was, is because it was Jeremy!

CAL couldn't very well ask the family,could she ? It's one person's word against the other and because I read between the lines I can understand that Jeremy told the truth,judging by the whole gamut which was " family life " at WHF ! No different to other lives,theirs wasn't unique at all. 

[Jane]

The reason why Lookout won't say who the source for the comment was, is because it was Jeremy!

Quelle surprise!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Caroline]

CAL couldn't very well ask the family,could she ? It's one person's word against the other and because I read between the lines I can understand that Jeremy told the truth,judging by the whole gamut which was " family life " at WHF ! No different to other lives,theirs wasn't unique at all.

His word means nothing if it can't be verified.

[lookout]

I'm delighted you now seem to have taken on board, that from the time Colin left, there is no one who can verify what transpired en famille, Jeremy's input, according to how one sees it, is questionable. Other than that there are the two phone calls received on the night of the massacre.

I'm not making "a big deal". I'm simply asking you to provide a source for your statement that a specific thing "always drove Sheila mad with anger" to which your only reply was to say that you "read between the lines".

I've already given you the source---------page 56 of CAL's book 

[lookout]

His word means nothing if it can't be verified.

Same goes for the books which have been written,doesn't it ?