Author Topic: before dna what did blood evdence prove.  (Read 4073 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« on: May 25, 2016, 01:50:PM »
thing i think we have to before dna evdence what could be gained from the blood evdence.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2016, 02:12:PM »
If Bamber's blood was found at the scene it would have been game over. However he was padded up and not injured.

June's blood being on the pillow highlights she was shot while sleeping. So shot first by Bamber, allowing Neville to move slightly before his shots.

Sheila's blood being underneath the bible shows the bible was put there by Bamber after she died.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 02:14:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2016, 02:14:PM »
but before dna you couldent of proved for fact it was his blood.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2016, 02:16:PM »
Human blood in the silencer shows it was used on the massacre night.

Sheila's blood in the silencer shows Bamber was the killer.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2016, 02:19:PM »
before dna they could not say whose blood was silencer all they could say was whose wasnt in there.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2016, 02:21:PM »
It also showed a match to RWB's blood,as it proves nothing but the grouping and not DNA.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2016, 02:25:PM »
exactly all they was blood groups that means they could exclude people as the source of the blood they couldent say for a fact it was them.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2016, 02:29:PM »
Human blood and the aga paint in the silencer shows it was used on the massacre night.

Everyone at trial agreed with the experts it was Sheila's blood inside the silencer. Meaning Bamber was the killer.

Bamber tried to challenge it being Sheila's blood ten years later. But was unsuccessful.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 02:30:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2016, 02:33:PM »
 What about RWB's being the SAME match ?

Couldn't it also be said that it was his blood which was found on the silencer ?
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 02:34:PM by lookout »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2016, 02:37:PM »
or you rwbs blood was the same match lookout.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2016, 02:41:PM »
He had the same match as Sheila,nugs. It's somewhere on the forum.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2016, 02:42:PM »
i take you means hes the same blood group

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2016, 03:02:PM »
Human blood and the aga paint in the silencer shows it was used on the massacre night.

Everyone at trial agreed with the experts it was Sheila's blood inside the silencer. Meaning Bamber was the killer.

Bamber tried to challenge it being Sheila's blood ten years later. But was unsuccessful.

the jury were being seriously misled if they were told that.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #13 on: May 25, 2016, 03:17:PM »
i take you means hes the same blood group




Yes,the same blood group as each other. How " Sheila's blood " on the silencer indicated JB's guilt,I don't know------even if it had been used. I reckon that Sheila had perhaps handled it which would account for her blood being on it. That would be my logical way of thinking anyway.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: before dna what did blood evdence prove.
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2016, 03:21:PM »
sheila's fingertips had blood on them but none was found on the rifle