Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 351347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline susan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16196
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3240 on: July 08, 2016, 01:51:PM »
I thought there would be a straightforward answer.

No Brian Blackwell copy cat then Steve :)

 :)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :)) :))

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3241 on: July 13, 2016, 09:25:AM »
Dr Lloyd, exposed the prosecution experts 'LEAD DEPOSIT' evidence, as 'UNRELIABLE', because of the delay (83 days) between when the swabs were taken from Sheila Caffell (7th August, 1985), and the date the swabs in question were analysed for 'Levels of Lead Deposit (29th October, 1985), as compared to the date, hand swabs were obtained, from testtees, Hayward and Woodroffe (18th October, 1985), and the date these swabs were analysed (29th October, 1985) only being 11 days - the results were bound to be significantly different because of the delays involved between the date swabs were obtained, and the date all swabs were analysed. In this respect, the prosecutions case relied upon a dishonest argument which certainly deceived the jury regarding the potential for Sheila Caffell to have handled bullets, and loaded them into the ammunition magazine of the anshuzt rifle...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3242 on: July 13, 2016, 09:30:AM »
Dr Lloyd is correct, when he talks about the 'evaporation rates' of 'PETROLEUM ETHER' on the swabs making a 'significant' difference to any results obtained from hand swabs that are analysed over different time frames...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 09:32:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3243 on: July 13, 2016, 09:36:AM »
Dr Lloyd is correct, when he talks about the 'evaporation rates' of 'PETROLEUM ETHER' on the swabs making a 'significant' difference to any results obtained from hand swabs that are analysed over different time frames...

What we have got in this case, are hand swabs taken from Sheila Caffell, some 83 days before they were tested and analysed, as opposed to a delay of only 11 days between the taking of the testees hand swabs (J. Hayward and S. Woodroffe). The court was certainly deceived in this instance, since it was fed 'misleading' and 'inaccurate' evidence...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3244 on: July 13, 2016, 10:11:AM »
Testee, Sue Woodroffe's hand swab results, were obtained '11 days' after the swabs were taken from her!!!
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3245 on: July 13, 2016, 10:15:AM »
Testee, John Hayward', (corrupted bastard), hand swabs, were analysed (29th October, 1983), 11 days after they had been obtained from him (18th October, 1985), lets get the facts right...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 11:04:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3246 on: July 13, 2016, 10:23:AM »
The 'Prosecution Experts', deceived the courts, in my book, this amounts to an of offence, of 'MALFEANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE', including the deliberate involvement of the CPS / DPP, and the Crown Prosecutor - nothing could be any clearer, in my opinion...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 10:23:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3247 on: July 13, 2016, 10:31:AM »
The 'Prosecution Experts', deceived the courts, in my book, this amounts to an of offence, of 'MALFEANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE', including the deliberate involvement of the CPS / DPP, and the Crown Prosecutor - nothing could be any clearer, in my opinion...

Everyone involved in this 'Conspiracy' should be prosecuted, convicted, sentenced, and the key thrown away, so that each and everyone of these 'BASTARDS' get what they deserve for manufacturing evidence, to get an innocent man (Jeremy Bamber), convicted for these murders, because they deliberately falsified the 'LEAD DEPOSIT' results, to suggest that Sheila had not handled bullets and loaded them into the gun, when in actual fact, 'SHE HAD DONE', and 'DID'...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 10:33:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3248 on: July 13, 2016, 10:53:AM »
Everyone involved in this 'Conspiracy' should be prosecuted, convicted, sentenced, and the key thrown away, so that each and everyone of these 'BASTARDS' get what they deserve for manufacturing evidence, to get an innocent man (Jeremy Bamber), convicted for these murders, because they deliberately falsified the 'LEAD DEPOSIT' results, to suggest that Sheila had not handled bullets and loaded them into the gun, when in actual fact, 'SHE HAD DONE', and 'DID'...

Any other case, where these experts have had involvement on behalf of the dodgy prosecuting authorities will, 'have to be reviewed'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3249 on: July 13, 2016, 11:07:AM »
What we are dealing with here, is corruption, and 'malfeance in office', from bottom to the top, and the Criminal Justice System has been brought into disrepute by these 'official Criminals'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3250 on: July 13, 2016, 11:24:AM »
Yesterday, I attended Barnsley Magistrates Court for trial - I was charged with causing Criminal Damage to the windscreen of a 7.5 ton truck (Car Transporter). The South Yorkshire Police, and the South Yorkshire CPS have had this slur hanging over my head since the 5th September, last year. I admitted smashing the windscreen in 'self - defence', but they charged me, and despite the driver of the 7.5 ton truck attempting to knock me down twice, succeeding on the third attempt, and he getting two of his 'hoodie criminals' to hold me at gun point, and slash me with use of a stanley blade, and push me into a ravine, left for dead, the cunt was not even charged with anything, or being at peril of being convicted of anything. The Criminal justice system is 'fucked up'. South Yorkshire police, and the CPS, are a fucking joke. In fairness to the CPS, yesterday, they offered 'no evidence', and the magistrates threw the case out. But let it be noted, that at the time the driver of the 7.5 ton truck tried to knock me down, and did eventually knock me down, the bastard increased his speed. I was demanding the 'tacho' as evidence to establish this fact, but South Yorkshire Police said they had not bothered to seize it, or to get it analysed. Can you imagine that? I am not entitled to any compensation for what these bastards have done to me, an what they have put me through. I am fucking fuming...

22 stitches to the right hand side of my head/face, I am scarred for the rest of my life, and the bastards get away with it 'scot - free'...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3251 on: July 13, 2016, 11:27:AM »
Yesterday, I attended Barnsley Magistrates Court for trial - I was charged with causing Criminal Damage to the windscreen of a 7.5 ton truck (Car Transporter). The South Yorkshire Police, and the South Yorkshire CPS have had this slur hanging over my head since the 5th September, last year. I admitted smashing the windscreen in 'self - defence', but they charged me, and despite the driver of the 7.5 ton truck attempting to knock me down twice, succeeding on the third attempt, and he getting two of his 'hoodie criminals' to hold me at gun point, and slash me with use of a stanley blade, and push me into a ravine, left for dead, the cunt was not even charged with anything, or being at peril of being convicted of anything. The Criminal justice system is 'fucked up'. South Yorkshire police, and the CPS, are a fucking joke. In fairness to the CPS, yesterday, they offered 'no evidence', and the magistrates threw the case out. But let it be noted, that at the time the driver of the 7.5 ton truck tried to knock me down, and did eventually knock me down, the bastard increased his speed. I was demanding the 'tacho' as evidence to establish this fact, but South Yorkshire Police said they had not bothered to seize it, or to get it analysed. Can you imagine that? I am not entitled to any compensation for what these bastards have done to me, an what they have put me through. I am fucking fuming...

22 stitches to the right hand side of my head/face, I am scarred for the rest of my life, and the bastards get away with it 'scot - free'...

Still, the truth won out in the end...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3252 on: July 13, 2016, 11:32:AM »
That is what 'justice' is all about - sticking to the truth, standing your ground against all the odds stacked against you by the opposition. Prosecution witnesses are believed by the courts 100%, but if you are a defendant, or a defence witness, you do not get afforded the same consideration - a defendant is 'guilty' until proven 'innocent', no matter what the tofts of this world say otherwise...

This applied to Jeremy Bamber, and all the other victims of 'miscarriages of justice'...

Bamber, was 'certainly framed' for these murders...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3253 on: July 13, 2016, 11:36:AM »
I am on his side, anyway. I truly believe that he did not kill his family, and I am 99.9% certain that he did not put up someone else to carry out the killings on his behalf...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #3254 on: July 13, 2016, 11:40:AM »
I am on his side, anyway. I truly believe that he did not kill his family, and I am 99.9% certain that he did not put up someone else to carry out the killings on his behalf...

I am convinced of Bambers innocence, since I don't know of anybody who adopts the approach that I rely upon when looking into cases which are deemed to be potential miscarriages of justice. Bamber is not that clever that he made so many 'simple mistakes'. It is misleading for anybody, particularly, the Home Secretary of the Day, to say that Bamber almost got away with the perfect murder. What was perfect about these murders? Nothing...
« Last Edit: July 13, 2016, 11:41:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...