Simply put your suggesting that the CT are fabricating or misrepresenting Michael Turner QC notes? Fair enough that's a plausible opinion but I don't see any good reason to believe that is the case.
There are a large number of claims and accusations written on the campaign teams website. They provide references apparently justifying their claims, however when those references are actually examined, it is usually the case that the reference either doesn't corroborate their claims at all, or a very one sided assumption has been made, or something is being viewed out of context.
A classic example is their claim that the police were in conversation with somebody inside the house.
I suspect that the information which you attempted to pass off as a direct quote from Turners appeal notes, follows this same pattern.
The appeal Judgment put forward to the public is a white wash .....
Oh, well that settles that then, let's all go home.
Needless to say, I do not agree with your view.
Put it this way if the argument about the shell casings came from Distefano's notes I would no problem agreeing with your opinion on the matter. 
I am not asking you to agree. You seem to be derisory towards people/groups sporadically, as if it's an attempt to come across as being reasonable.
It's not that long ago when you were rubbishing both Mike and the Campaign Teams claims. Now you tell us that you see no reason why the Campaign Team would lie.
It's a bit weird to tell you the truth.
What you quote there is not specific to JB, However you fail to quote the one extract that is, for some reason
I quoted two extracts which were relevant to him representing people who were not innocent, which was the subject of my preceding paragraph, which offered my opinion that his involvement didn't impact in any way on the likely guilt or innocence of Jeremy. You appeared to have suggested his involvement scored you some points.
