What makes Bamber innocent?

[maggie]

Now that presents us with a conundrum, Caroline. WHO, knowing said foot was NOT Sheila's, would have presented it as being such?

I have wondered that Jane because surely to anyone who has  any familiarity with June and Sheila, even from looking at photos and reading general info about them, would be hard pushed to believe that was Sheila's foot. 
No offence but maybe Andrew Hunter may be more easily convinced of this simply because he's a bloke and a foot to him is just a foot?? 

[lookout]

I've never been convinced that it was Sheila's foot,but------------------if that IS nail varnish that I can now see,and if it matches that which is on her fingernails,then it's questionable. I've seen feet,skin etc of the young deceased and after a few hours of being in a mortuary,they take on an appearance of an older person,for obvious physiological/biological reasons.
There's every possibility that it now is the foot belonging to Sheila because the former MP must have got his source from somewhere and someone he knew.

[maggie]

I've never been convinced that it was Sheila's foot,but------------------if that IS nail varnish that I can now see,and if it matches that which is on her fingernails,then it's questionable. I've seen feet,skin etc of the young deceased and after a few hours of being in a mortuary,they take on an appearance of an older person,for obvious physiological/biological reasons.
There's every possibility that it now is the foot belonging to Sheila because the former MP must have got his source from somewhere and someone he knew.

I do see your point lookout.  If the muscles and ligaments have contracted it may look like that but I'm not convinced.

[maggie]

hmm...let's see...who posts lies all the time on here

What are you insinuating John?  Just because someone may post opinions you don't agree with, it certainly doesn't mean they are lying.

[lookout]

I do see your point lookout.  If the muscles and ligaments have contracted it may look like that but I'm not convinced.

It's quite a big foot and if it was stretched out in its live form,would prove to be longer. A large big toe too which usually denotes a taller person. I'm going by my own " size 7's " and the size is in conjunction with the toe and heel of the pic.

[lookout]

You mean you believe Tesko when he claims he has a photo of Sheila on the bed with a single gunshot wound to her throat?

In view of what was told to AE by Stan Jones,shall we wait and see if EP release what they shouldn't be hanging on to ?

[Caroline]

I've never been convinced that it was Sheila's foot,but------------------if that IS nail varnish that I can now see,and if it matches that which is on her fingernails,then it's questionable. I've seen feet,skin etc of the young deceased and after a few hours of being in a mortuary,they take on an appearance of an older person,for obvious physiological/biological reasons.
There's every possibility that it now is the foot belonging to Sheila because the former MP must have got his source from somewhere and someone he knew.

They don't take on the appearance of an older person, those feet belong to an older woman - that is clear from the picture. June was covered in blood, her toenails probably have dried blood on them. The MP is quite an enthusiastic supporter and seems willing to believe quite a lot of things.

[Jane]

I do see your point lookout.  If the muscles and ligaments have contracted it may look like that but I'm not convinced.

The back of the heel looks particularly aged.

[lookout]

They don't take on the appearance of an older person, those feet belong to an older woman - that is clear from the picture. June was covered in blood, her toenails probably have dried blood on them. The MP is quite an enthusiastic supporter and seems willing to believe quite a lot of things.

June was plastered in blood from head to toe. That foot doesn't show blood which ran down her body or it would have been left saturated. Let's not forget that Junes injuries were greater from bullet wounds than that of her husband's.
As for the toenails,why wouldn't the rest of her foot be blood-soaked and not just her toenails ? That pic shows a foot with nail varnish,something that I doubt June would have worn.

[lookout]

The back of the heel looks particularly aged.

A deceased person's heel looks like that because the elasticity has diminished and as Maggie said,skin contracts.
My heel is still smooth.I'm " old ",but I ain't dead,so that's nothing to go by.

[lookout]

They don't take on the appearance of an older person, those feet belong to an older woman - that is clear from the picture. June was covered in blood, her toenails probably have dried blood on them. The MP is quite an enthusiastic supporter and seems willing to believe quite a lot of things.

You can only argue with that point if you've seen a cadaver and the texture of their skin after a few hours of death.

[mike tesko]

June didn't paint her toe nails...

[Jane]

A deceased person's heel looks like that because the elasticity has diminished and as Maggie said,skin contracts.
My heel is still smooth.I'm " old ",but I ain't dead,so that's nothing to go by.

Conversely, whilst I'm not as old as you, the skin on the back of my heels looks very much like that.

[maggie]

You mean you believe Tesko when he claims he has a photo of Sheila on the bed with a single gunshot wound to her throat?

I mean it's not ok to call anyone a liar on the public forum.

[lookout]

Feet age in comparatively younger people,with corns,calluses and bunions,to say nothing of ingrowing toenails and dropped arches. Wearing high heels adds to the strain.