What makes Bamber innocent?

[sami]

This man (Jeremy Bamber) wasn't clever enough to carry out the murders in the way alleged by the prosecutions case, back in August, 1985. He was not intelligent enough, and did not possesses what it 'might take' to almost be 'the person capable of executing the near perfect murders'. For my part (since 1989, onward) Jeremy was incapable of being the 'intelligent monster' that police and the prosecution made him out to be. I found him to be 'lacking in status',  'not' to 'be that person', either 'intellectually', or 'psychologically', he would in my estimation have qualified to be nothing more than 'an amateur', the 'total opposite' to the kind of person required for him to be, to have carried out the 'atrocities' he has been accused and 'convicted' of having committed...

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would place 'Jeremy' at level 2 of being 'involved' in the shootings of his family...

Basically put, he was 'too thick' to have had the ability to have even attempted to 'carry out the murders' he has been 'accused of committing', and 'carried out'...

mike calling a friend a' thick' thats not very nice

[mike tesko]

mike calling a friend a' thick' thats not very nice

Sorry you take 'that view'...

I have many 'thick' friends, I do not describe them as such, detrimentally. I am just pointing out, that 'some of us have it, others, 'don't'...

[mike tesko]

Jeremy Bamber hasn't got it in him, to have been 'the killer'...

[mike tesko]

I 'know the profile', of a potential killer, 'Jeremy Bamber', doesn't fit into my 'category of being a killer'...

Ok, just for the record, I can tell you that 'I have personal experience' of having had 'contact' with many persons accused, and convicted, of 'murdering people'. Be it an 'individual murder', or 'mass murder'...

[Steve_uk]

'Street wise', Jeremy Bamber was 'a wassock'. He was 'pathetic', a person who thought he was better than the average 'Joe', simply because he 'had people from a good background, behind him'...

This might all be true, but look at his allotted lifestyle compared to that which he craved. He saw a means to an end and he took it.

[mike tesko]

I 'prefer not to go into details', but rest assured 'I know what it takes, to know' what it takes to 'be a killer'...

[Caroline]

This man (Jeremy Bamber) wasn't clever enough to carry out the murders in the way alleged by the prosecutions case, back in August, 1985. He was not intelligent enough, and did not possesses what it 'might take' to almost be 'the person capable of executing the near perfect murders'. For my part (since 1989, onward) Jeremy was incapable of being the 'intelligent monster' that police and the prosecution made him out to be. I found him to be 'lacking in status',  'not' to 'be that person', either 'intellectually', or 'psychologically', he would in my estimation have qualified to be nothing more than 'an amateur', the 'total opposite' to the kind of person required for him to be, to have carried out the 'atrocities' he has been accused and 'convicted' of having committed...

On a scale of 1 to 10, I would place 'Jeremy' at level 2 of being 'involved' in the shootings of his family...

Basically put, he was 'too thick' to have had the ability to have even attempted to 'carry out the murders' he has been 'accused of committing', and 'carried out'...

I've got in on a 9.5 - I agree that he wasn't clever enough to get away with it - which is why he didn't.

[mike tesko]

This might all be true, but look at his allotted lifestyle compared to that which he craved. He saw a means to an end and he took it.

You are 'attributing' to him, 'abilities' he simply did 'not possesses', by August, 1985...

[mike tesko]

You are 'attributing' to him, 'abilities' he simply did 'not possesses', by August, 1985...

What, he is like now (2016), is totally different to what he was like, in 'August, 1985'...

[Caroline]

You are 'attributing' to him, 'abilities' he simply did 'not possesses', by August, 1985...

Well, not according to people who knew him at that time.

[mike tesko]

Well, not according to people who knew him at that time.

I 'knew' Jeremy from 1989 to 1990, (until early, 2004)...

Who are 'you referring to'?

Provide their names, and I will give my 'analysis' of 'them'...

[David1819]

I've got in on a 9.5 - I agree that he wasn't clever enough to get away with it - which is why he didn't.

The argument mike is putting forward is that he wasn't clever enough to formulate and engineer such a performance in the first place

[mike tesko]

The argument mike is putting forward is that he wasn't clever enough to formulate and engineer such a performance in the first place

 I agree, Jeremy Bamber, was ' too thick, to have done 'what he was accused of doing', for him to have 'been the killer'...

[mike tesko]

Ok, just for the record, I have met many and many of people who 'killed people' in one way or another. All these 'murderers' do 'not fit' the profile of that which 'I' attribute to 'Jeremy'...

[sami]

I agree, Jeremy Bamber, was ' too thick, to have done 'what he was accused of doing', for him to have 'been the killer'...

i disagree jb put in a masterful perfomance after robbing the caravan park