Author Topic: What makes Bamber innocent?  (Read 348309 times)

0 Members and 82 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1170 on: May 21, 2016, 03:56:AM »
What a load of bollocks.  Someone obviously needed to visit specsavers urgently!

No such photo exists!

You are a complete fool, and idiotic...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1171 on: May 21, 2016, 04:02:AM »
Not so long ago, the idiot from red, sarcastically wished me luck, in producing a list of everybody who testified during Jeremy's trial, as though I would not be able to do so. Hey, but guess what, the idiot was proved 'wrong'...

Moreover, I have the transcripts somewhere in my possession, at least those handed over to the COLP investigators, as part of their investigation...

Oh, dear...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1172 on: May 21, 2016, 04:07:AM »
So...

Now I shall move on to the evidence and the sworn testimony given in previous witness statements and during trial testimony of PC David Bird, concerning the order with which he took all of his crime scene photographs relied upon, and attested to, during the trial...

He lied to the court that tried this case...

So, what's new?

Maybe he even got himself promoted for deceiving the court...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1173 on: May 21, 2016, 04:32:AM »
It was PC Bird who deceived the court which tried the case originally in October, 1986...

He introduced the so called 'master copy, album' consisting of only 223 photographs...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1174 on: May 21, 2016, 04:42:AM »
It was PC Bird who deceived the court which tried the case originally in October, 1986...

He introduced the so called 'master copy, album' consisting of only 223 photographs...

I can now report that he was actually responsible for 'editing' a total of 601 images, contained on  61 separate negative strips, and that in total there originally existed 610 exposures, but only 581 images making it into 'THE SENIOR INVESTIGATIONG OFFICERS ALBUM'...

28 IMAGES WERE SUPPRESSED...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1175 on: May 21, 2016, 04:53:AM »
Here is a comprehensive list of the serial numbers of each of the 61 'negative strips' used as part of the investigation:-

020
0040
0015
0012
0034
0009
0037
0023
0002
0024
0039
0043
0003
0021
0065
0011
0014
0025
0035
0028
0016
0041
0033
0001
0002
0007
0006
0019
0031
0036
0032
0010
0030
0060
0059
0018
0017
0066
009
0026
0008
0027
005
0050
0051
0045
0040
0047
0046
0049
0062
0064
0061
0063
0052
0053
0054
0055
0056
0057
0013


There were exactly 10 negatives per each of the 61 strips...
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 08:10:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1176 on: May 21, 2016, 04:55:AM »
This information was not made available to the court during the trial in October, 1986, but remained concealed by Essex police until at the very earliest, 18th December, 2001...
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 05:06:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1177 on: May 21, 2016, 05:16:AM »
In a witness statement made by somebody purporting to be PC Bird, dated, 21st January, 2001, it is acknowledged that the order with which photographs had been taken as previously referred to by him, was 'incorrect'...

I shall take this opportunity to remind you all about photograph 23 which shows the anshuzt rifle leaning against the bedroom window, 'before' it was moved 'onto' the body and photographed. During trial both PC Bird and DI Cook falsely maintained that that photograph (23) had been taken 'after' Cook had removed it from the body...

Such a deception contributed to the jury convicting Jeremy of the murders, because they were persuaded that 'he' had staged his sisters death by placing the anshuzt rifle on her body to make it appear she had taken her own life. But, in actual fact, cops placed the rifle on Sheila's body to suggest she had killed herself...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1178 on: May 21, 2016, 09:40:AM »
...
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 09:42:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1179 on: May 21, 2016, 10:47:AM »
In a witness statement made by somebody purporting to be PC Bird, dated, 21st January, 2001, it is acknowledged that the order with which photographs had been taken as previously referred to by him, was 'incorrect'...

I shall take this opportunity to remind you all about photograph 23 which shows the anshuzt rifle leaning against the bedroom window, 'before' it was moved 'onto' the body and photographed. During trial both PC Bird and DI Cook falsely maintained that that photograph (23) had been taken 'after' Cook had removed it from the body...

Such a deception contributed to the jury convicting Jeremy of the murders, because they were persuaded that 'he' had staged his sisters death by placing the anshuzt rifle on her body to make it appear she had taken her own life. But, in actual fact, cops placed the rifle on Sheila's body to suggest she had killed herself...
so who leaned it by the window in the first place where you claim it was .sheila after shooting her self she proped the rifle than laid down to die.highly unlikely

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1180 on: May 21, 2016, 10:51:AM »
so who leaned it by the window in the first place where you claim it was .sheila after shooting her self she proped the rifle than laid down to die.highly unlikely


Sami, I don't believe it's unreasonable to say police removed it from her to A) ascertain it's safety and B) take pictures before replacing it.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1181 on: May 21, 2016, 10:55:AM »

Sami, I don't believe it's unreasonable to say police removed it from her to A) ascertain it's safety and B) take pictures before replacing it.
thats excatly my opinion jane.if it was by the window than it was taken from the body and put there by police after checking it and making it safe

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1182 on: May 21, 2016, 11:03:AM »
Mike,you surpass any legal expert with the work that you've put in here. I congratulate you.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1183 on: May 21, 2016, 11:08:AM »
Mike,you surpass any legal expert with the work that you've put in here. I congratulate you.
i think jb and his team would disagree with you strongly
« Last Edit: May 21, 2016, 11:11:AM by sami »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: What makes Bamber innocent?
« Reply #1184 on: May 21, 2016, 11:11:AM »
Mike,you surpass any legal expert with the work that you've put in here. I congratulate you.

So now you think the police did shoot Sheila?
Few people have the imagination for reality