Most of it is simply material relating to Jeremy's complaints after the trial and the various Inquiry's which took place into police conduct. The evidence is a different matter and that was before the jury. This constant reference to hidden material which will free Bamber is just a smokescreen.
Matters which were not placed before the jury because cops and CPS deliberately withheld access to such material is 'evidence', once it becomes known. It has nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not J has complained about these tactics by cops or the CPS. Since, but for cop dishonesty the jury would have considered the 'missing' evidence in question. Just because the jury did not hear 'this evidence' during the trial does not 'invalidate' it as evidence. Of course its evidence, no matter whether J or anybody else has since found out about it, or complained about it, or discussed it on a forum such as this. Yes, there is still material being withheld, all of which is potential evidence that is capable of establishing that J is 100% innocent. Why would cops and CPS still after over 30 years be seeking to withhold it?
The answer to these questions is that cops know when Sheila actually died, how she died and that she was shot with two different weapons. She was shot once downstairs in the kitchen whilst the anshuzt rifle was upstairs resting against the bedroom window. For confirmation of this you need to get your hands on the currently withheld 'Officers Report' relating to the shooting incident downstairs in the kitchen at the time of entry. Why would such a report exist, yet cops and CPS seek for over 30 years to deliberately withhold it. So, that is evidence there. The evidence in question being the actual existence of such a report, about how Sheila got shot downstairs in the kitchen whilst the anshuzt rifle was resting against the bedroom window upstairs (that too is evidence). It is 'evidence' that 'two bodies, not one' was reported as being 'found downstairs' in the 'kitchen', after and inclusive of the reported discovery of dads body. Again, that is 'evidence' that we now know about, which the jury never got chance to hear because cops and CPS withheld the true contents of the police message logs (that is also evidence). If per chance the cops, CPS and people like you, want to throw in the argument that PC Collins mistakenly identified dads body as the body of a female, then fine go ahead. Since, this will be counter argued that any such mistake only involves one of the two bodies found downstairs, and reported as found downstairs (which is evidence). It is 'evidence' that a female body was found downstairs after dads body itself had already been found downstairs in the same kitchen. Again, this is evidence contained in the previously undisclosed police message logs. It is 'evidence' that not only was it confirmed that two bodies had been found upon entry at 7.37am, but this fact was re-affirmed at 7.38am, and later at various stages all the way up to 8.10am, with another previously undisclosed message being past, that 'after a thorough search of the premises', it states, 'a further three bodies found upstairs' and 'five dead in total'. Again, that is 'evidence'. The fact that at the time of the trial 'two different versions of events' regarding the body count downstairs and upstairs, and the fact that one version of these events was being deliberately withheld, is I am afraid 'evidence' that there has been, ney there was and there is a cover up surrounding 'the death' of at least one of the five victims. Now, you can pretend to be as brain dead as you like, but it should be obvious to someone even as biased as you are, that cops certainly knew and they know exactly how, when and where one of the female victims was shot and died inside that farmhouse. Again, this is evidence. The time one of these females died is 'important' to the validity of these convictions, because if one of the two females was 'not dead' when cops got into the kitchen, then it raises very serious legal and ethical question marks over the legitimacy of the convictions. I will leave you to try to fathom out which of the two females was found downstairs, but I will give you a clue. It was either June Bamber, or it was Sheila Caffell (and that is evidence). I will provide you with an additional clue to try and guide you toward the correct interpretation - the female body found downstairs had committed suicide. Again, more 'evidence'. How much 'evidence does one need before they are satisfied that the cop version of events as relied upon at trial was a completely dishonest account regarding where the positioning of the 5 bodies were found, met with or confronted by when they entered the kitchen downstairs, and the two bedrooms upstairs. Why did cops and CPS deliberately withhold the true version of the events as recorded in the cop message logs if they had not told lies, and had got 'nothing to hide'? Again, that is 'evidence'. Two bodies downstairs, three bodies upstairs, versus one body downstairs, four bodies upstairs, that is the 'issue' that the jury should have been deciding this case on, not whether Sheila or Jeremy were the killer. That, my friend, is 'evidence', it is evidence of a cover up. Do you know something, its people like you that make me angry. Let me remind you about what the judge told the jury in his biased summing up. He said that there was 'no evidence' of a 'third party' involvement in these killings. It had to be either Sheila or Jeremy. Well, that is not right, because it didn't have to have been either Sheila or Jeremy. It only got presented like this because cops and CPS deliberately withheld 'evidence' of the 'other' version of where each of the five bodies had been found, contained in the withheld police message logs. Now, that is 'evidence'. There clearly existed, albeit a fact only known to cops and the CPS during the trial, that 'evidence' of at least one of the two females still being alive at the time cops entered the kitchen, by reference to, and with reliance upon the content of the contemporaneously recorded police message logs. That only 'three bodies had been found upstairs' by 8.10am that morning. That is 'evidence', whether you choose to like it or not. Had the defence known about the existence of these police message logs, I can say with 100% certainty that their case would have been as follows. They would have defended J by stating that Sheila was still alive downstairs in the kitchen when police entered. At that time she was 'unarmed'. That cops miscalculated the reason why the family own rifle suddenly appeared at the bedroom window. That cops thought the placement of that rifle there meant Sheila was resting upstairs, or perhaps being prepared to 'surrender'. In any event what cops did not bargain for was them being confronted by Sheila downstairs in the kitchen. During a struggle over possession of one of the cops guns she was shot and presumed to have died there in the kitchen from that wound. This would be a mistake because that first shot had not as was originally thought killed her. At this precise moment the rifle was still resting against the window upstairs. Cops reported the two bodies found in the kitchen, dads body first, then a female. That female could only have been a reference to Sheila. This is because cops reported that during the struggle between one of the cops in possession of his weapon, with Sheila, how she had pulled the barrel of his gun into her throat at the time a single shot was discharged from the gun. Her death being therefore described as a 'suicide'. How cops had gone all the way through the house, downstairs, and then upon reaching the upstairs part of the farmhouse, how 'a further three bodies' had been found by 8.10am. By 10 O'clock, how PC Bird (soco) had been instructed to photograph the bodies 'insitu', now laid out in a completely different configuration, no longer two bodies downstairs, three bodies upstairs. Now, the photographs showed only one body downstairs, with the other four bodies upstairs. It would not have been necessary for Rivlin QC to outline exactly how this 'problem' in the prosecutions case had arisen. All he needed to have done, had he been given the opportunity was to advance the two different versions of the events as documented by the cops themselves, to be able to satisfy the jury that J could not possibly have been responsible for shooting dead his sister upstairs in the bedroom, of staging her death there, of removing the silencer after he had killed her upstairs in the bedroom with use of it, in the bedroom. He could not possibly have been responsible for doing any of that or this, because Sheila was still alive downstairs in the kitchen when cops entered. She had not been shot by that stage, and the gun which cops said had fired both shots which killed her, was still resting against the bedroom window upstairs when she got shot downstairs and was reported as being dead, by 'suicide'. What a mystery, she had supposedly committed suicide, ' downstairs', with use of a gun that was 'upstairs at the bedroom window'. In any event, if she was dead downstairs in the kitchen from as early as 7.37am until 8.10am, how had her body managed to end up on the bedroom floor by 10am in order for it to be photographed there? Had she 'not' been dead earlier? But if she had not been killed downstairs, had not as it were committed suicide, how had the second shot that was inflicted under her chin been made?
Surely, Jeremy could not have been responsible for shooting her once, let alone twice in these circumstances...
