David1819 - forensic breakthrough claim

[lookout]

 Strange how I knew how this thread would pan out !!

[susan]

I was born and brought up in that era when " kisses and cuddles " were in short supply but it didn't mean that children were thought any less of. I'd wager a bet that more children back then were born more out of love than in this day and age where we see countless cases of child neglect and cruelty !!

Hello lookout

I agree with your post but think we are in the wrong thread.

[John]

Yet that's what had " sealed the deal " so far as everyone was concerned ? Because there was now't else.

In your opinion.

[John]

The CAL claim was rubbished as that issue had been discussed before on here, and in 2011 by Woffinden.

David also said in 2015 he was going to submit a breakdown of how Sheila committed the massacre. Then delayed this submission to 2016 as he wanted to make it detailed. It has never been submitted.

How predictable 

None of these claimed breakthroughs ever materialise but never mind, the craic is good.

[Stephanie]

Hello Steph

I cannot comment on Jeremy Bamber being a psychopath as I have not got a clue.  I strongly believe posters should post with different views without conflict and I always try to do and I apologise if I come over like that.  I thought it was terrible that David's find has been ridiculed to a certain extent as none of us know what it is and I am sure NGB would not have posted about it if he did not think it was worth a mention.

There's no need to apologise for your opinions Susan but what you are suggesting, unless I'm misinterpreting what you have posted, is that because NGB has posted in what you perceive as 'support of David,' people like myself (who believe Bamber is guilty) shouldn't give further opinion as to do so shows disrespect to NGB in some way and/or undermines his credibility in his field?

I have based my opinion on what I have seen of some of David's posts. I believe he is ego lead. I've no idea what he has found but I don't believe whatever it is will change my belief that Bamber is a psychopath.

[Stephanie]

The CAL claim was rubbished as that issue had been discussed before on here, and in 2011 by Woffinden.

David also said in 2015 he was going to submit a breakdown of how Sheila committed the massacre. Then delayed this submission to 2016 as he wanted to make it detailed. It has never been submitted.

So then David sounds like a conspiracy theorist...

[mike tesko]

No it doesn't. It just shows errors were made!

You can't call the blatant introduction of a decoy second silencer (DRB/1)  an error...

What they have done, is a criminal offence, its called perverting the course of justice, its called fabricating of the evidence, its nothing remotely like anything you could possibly describe as 'an error'...

They dropped a clanger by introducing the second decoy silencer too late in the day. They have shot themselves in the foot, so to speak. They call it 'tampering with the evidence', and people like them who do these things, do it with the view of making it look more believable that somebody is guilty of doing something they might not have done, or didn't do. These things they have done, can't be explained away as 'errors', no, no, no, these were deliberate acts of dishonesty, and I am afraid heads will have to roll...

[John]

You can't call the blatant introduction of a decoy second silencer (DRB/1)  an error...

What they have done, is a criminal offence, its called perverting the course of justice, its called fabricating of the evidence, its nothing remotely like anything you could possibly describe as 'an error'...

They dropped a clanger by introducing the second decoy silencer too late in the day. They have shot themselves in the foot, so to speak. They call it 'tampering with the evidence', and people like them who do these things, do it with the view of making it look more believable that somebody is guilty of doing something they might not have done, or didn't do. These things they have done, can't be explained away as 'errors', no, no, no, these were deliberate acts of dishonesty, and I am afraid heads will have to roll...

All merely in your opinion.

[mike tesko]

All merely in your opinion.

As relied upon by the provable facts now available to anyone and everyone...

[Stephanie]

As relied upon by the provable facts now available to anyone and everyone...

Where?

The more I see regarding Bambers claims of innocence, his CT vlogs, blogs and letters etc, the stronger my belief on his guilt becomes..

[Adam]

So then David sounds like a conspiracy theorist...

All supporters have to be.

[mike tesko]

The key to the undoing of the dodgy silencer evidence, was the fact that relatives did not find two separate parker hale silencers (SBJ/1 and DRB/1), one month a part. They only found one (SBJ/1) on the 10th August 1985. 'Ron' Cook fucked up the evidence, by exposing that silencer and any blood or paint in it, or upon it,  to the harmful fumes of superglue treatment on the 15th August, 1985. The relatives didn't find the second parker hale silencer (DRB/1) on the 11th September, 1985, they handed it over to police on that day. That's how the decoy silencer got introduced, it was needed as an uncontaminated carrier of the uncontaminated flake of blood. It was not workable to use the contaminated silencer (DB/1) as the carrier of the uncontaminated flake of dried blood, cops needed an uncontaminated second silencer, and the relatives duly provided them with DRB/1...

[susan]

There's no need to apologise for your opinions Susan but what you are suggesting, unless I'm misinterpreting what you have posted, is that because NGB has posted in what you perceive as 'support of David,' people like myself (who believe Bamber is guilty) shouldn't give further opinion as to do so shows disrespect to NGB in some way and/or undermines his credibility in his field?

I have based my opinion on what I have seen of some of David's posts. I believe he is ego lead. I've no idea what he has found but I don't believe whatever it is will change my belief that Bamber is a psychopath.

Steph
I must not have made myself clear as I think we all should have our own opinions and post them in a pleasant manner I don't like Adam's attitude at times and this is of course just how I perceive his posts I don'texpect posters to agree with me why should they. As far as David is concerned I know nothing about his ego as I have had no dealings with him.  Jeremy could indeed by a psychopath how would I know.

[JackiePreece]

Where?

The more I see regarding Bambers claims of innocence, his CT vlogs, blogs and letters etc, the stronger my belief on his guilt becomes..

The usual standard hilarious posts criticising everyone who believes JB is guilty

[Adam]

The key to the undoing of the dodgy silencer evidence, was the fact that relatives did not find two separate parker hale silencers (SBJ/1 and DRB/1), one month a part. They only found one (SBJ/1) on the 10th August 1985. 'Ron' Cook fucked up the evidence, by exposing that silencer and any blood or paint in it, or upon it,  to the harmful fumes of superglue treatment on the 15th August, 1985. The relatives didn't find the second parker hale silencer (DRB/1) on the 11th September, 1985, they handed it over to police on that day. That's how the decoy silencer got introduced, it was needed as an uncontaminated carrier of the uncontaminated flake of blood. It was not workable to use the contaminated silencer (DB/1) as the carrier of the uncontaminated flake of dried blood, cops needed an uncontaminated second silencer, and the relatives duly provided them with DRB/1...

I wonder why the police attempt to frame people ? I assume they join the police for honerable reasons and there is nothing in it for them.

The LA police planted OJ's blood and DNA at the crime scene, in his car, and at his property. Then planted Ron and Nicole's blood in his car and property. Then planted OJ's footprint, glove and cap at the crime scene. And the victims hair fibres on his clothes.

Why do the police try to frame innocent men ?